All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

WEEK 4 SUCKER BET brought to you by Tootsie Pop!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11438
Posts: 93
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #26
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 881
Posted: #27
Awesome pick..chaching!!! 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 102561
Posted: #28
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1008
Posted: #29
the cheifs should loose by atleast 17pts...they trully are horrible!!!!!!!  ride the hot streak till it fails every gambler knows that. i personally stay away from -10 lines or more... just tease broncos with the over because the broncos alone will score 30+
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 876
Posted: #30
Need Chiefs to win to complete 2 team parlay (OSU ML over USC) for a nice 74-1 payout...
 
Have loved the Chefs all week long, this would only be that much sweeter.
 
Chiefs 24-17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 4837
Posted: #31
Excellent stuff,thank you.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 18970
Posted: #32
i like it gl man
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #33
I dont like this game at all from a betting perspective but good luck Demapples
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2005
Posts: 6110
Posted: #34
ML +350
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3468
Posted: #35
gl on it 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52426
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Geez. I reallly like the Chiefs this week, but I DON'T LIKE that so many people are agreeing with the pick.
 
Usually when everyone disagrees, THEN you KNOW the Sucker Bet is gonna hit.
 
I'll be on it anyway.
 

 

Most people hate the pick, but those that like it understand two things.  One, that last week's lopsided loss was the fault of Tyler Thigpen, who won't get on the field today, and secondly, that the Broncos will have little left to give after the last two games they played.  Taking the Chiefs might seem crazy, but actually it's asking Denver to cover a big number on the road this week that's crazy.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 6525
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

Most people hate the pick, but those that like it understand two things.  One, that last week's lopsided loss was the fault of Tyler Thigpen, who won't get on the field today, and secondly, that the Broncos will have little left to give after the last two games they played.  Taking the Chiefs might seem crazy, but actually it's asking Denver to cover a big number on the road this week that's crazy.

 

 

 

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 12915
Posted: #38
I realize Covers is not the public however I would say 80% in this forum are on the Chiefs
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2061
Posted: #39
I've already laid my money on Denver -10.
 
I just don't see KC being able to keep up with Denver. The Broncos should win both halfs of football by at least 7 points, and they will equal at least a 14 point win.
 
And when did -10 become a sucker bet? A sucker bet is a number which seems to defy logic, not one which is pretty much right on.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9201
Posted: #40
denver 36,chiefs 19
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14915
Posted: #41
Good one.
 
Line is dropping, too, with public on Denver.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 315
Posted: #42
Always enjoyed reading your posts.

Good Luck Today
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52426
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by gus1689:

I realize Covers is not the public however I would say 80% in this forum are on the Chiefs

 

Covers IS the public, don't kid yourself, and 80% of the forum being on the Chiefs is a ludicrous exaggeration.  Dead wrong on both counts, good luck today, gus1689.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52426
Posted: #44

Quote Originally Posted by Vegasbuster:

I've already laid my money on Denver -10.

 

Kudos on laying the worst number possible on the worst bet possible.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 351
Posted: #45
kc
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52426
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Vegasbuster:

I've already laid my money on Denver -10.
 
I just don't see KC being able to keep up with Denver. The Broncos should win both halfs of football by at least 7 points, and they will equal at least a 14 point win.
 
 

 

Did you give no weight at all to what Denver has been through the last two weeks?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 52426
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by Vegasbuster:

I've already laid my money on Denver -10.
 
And when did -10 become a sucker bet? A sucker bet is a number which seems to defy logic, not one which is pretty much right on.
 

 

Actually, both types of lines can trick people just as effectively.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 404
Posted: #48
Mr. B I see you like KC and SD, anything else?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1155
Posted: #49
Taking the Chargers -7 look like a Sucker to me.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2061
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

Did you give no weight at all to what Denver has been through the last two weeks?

You are honestly comparing the New Orleans and San Diego offenses with KC? Mr Bator, your input is highly valued and respected, but that comparison is ridiculous.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.