What a weird decision to go for two in that situation when the line has been bouncing 6.5 to 7.5 all week
prevent a tie?,really
prevent a tie?,really
Dumbest comment ever
Dumbest comment ever
@newmarket
Don't call a Qnoner dumb, they don't take that kind of "tapping of the glass" kindly...let the fishies swim in peace and live their lives in ignorant bliss
@newmarket
Don't call a Qnoner dumb, they don't take that kind of "tapping of the glass" kindly...let the fishies swim in peace and live their lives in ignorant bliss
You guys remember last year Eagle with Carson Went same things happened.Dowm 14 last minute go for touchdown and go for 2.Vegas called that’s all
You guys remember last year Eagle with Carson Went same things happened.Dowm 14 last minute go for touchdown and go for 2.Vegas called that’s all
@packersbackers
Yeah 2 countries. Agreed? Me, i have no interest in the soviet social republic of the united states
Vegas wins again. They got everything figured out.
@packersbackers
Yeah 2 countries. Agreed? Me, i have no interest in the soviet social republic of the united states
Vegas wins again. They got everything figured out.
The bigger issue is that Tampa literally could do no wrong and Philly could do no right. Then as per usual on prime time, it completely flipped. Then Brady goes downfield when the under route was wide open. Then if that late completion gets a first down there is time enough to kick the field goal.
Now, my sheet had Tampa -6. The line was Tampa -7. I had no business betting this game, but did so for entertainment. Philly was a huge public team (sbr) and the line was moving in Tampa direction, so it was the correct play......just didnt pan out.
Anyone who says they bet Philly cause they knew they would go down 21 and get a backdoor cover by way of a 2 pt conversion is full of shit.
The bigger issue is that Tampa literally could do no wrong and Philly could do no right. Then as per usual on prime time, it completely flipped. Then Brady goes downfield when the under route was wide open. Then if that late completion gets a first down there is time enough to kick the field goal.
Now, my sheet had Tampa -6. The line was Tampa -7. I had no business betting this game, but did so for entertainment. Philly was a huge public team (sbr) and the line was moving in Tampa direction, so it was the correct play......just didnt pan out.
Anyone who says they bet Philly cause they knew they would go down 21 and get a backdoor cover by way of a 2 pt conversion is full of shit.
@newmarket
It makes sense to go for two there.
If you estimate extra point make percentage at 100% and 2-point conversion make percentage at 50%. It breaks down like this:
1. Extra point + Extra point = 100% chance of tying when you score twice.
2. a. First 2-point conversion has a 50% chance of making. If you make it, you kick an extra point at 100% accuracy. This means that you win 50% of the time when you score twice.
b. If you miss the first 2-point, then you can try again on the second one for a 50% chance again of tying. 50% x 50% = 25%, so you tie 25% of the time.
c. If you miss both, you lose 25% of the time.
So if you go for extra points, your W/T/L percentage is 0/100/0 but if you go for 2-points it's 50/25/25. If you consider that the ties take you to overtime where you have a roughly 50/50 chance of winning or losing at that point, they become 50/0/50 for EPs and 62.5/0/37.5 for 2Ps.
In reality, the extra points perform even worse when you consider that extra points are less than 100% in reality while 2 points are almost exactly 50%. And if your chance of winning in overtime is less than 50%, it skews even harder towards two point tries.
@newmarket
It makes sense to go for two there.
If you estimate extra point make percentage at 100% and 2-point conversion make percentage at 50%. It breaks down like this:
1. Extra point + Extra point = 100% chance of tying when you score twice.
2. a. First 2-point conversion has a 50% chance of making. If you make it, you kick an extra point at 100% accuracy. This means that you win 50% of the time when you score twice.
b. If you miss the first 2-point, then you can try again on the second one for a 50% chance again of tying. 50% x 50% = 25%, so you tie 25% of the time.
c. If you miss both, you lose 25% of the time.
So if you go for extra points, your W/T/L percentage is 0/100/0 but if you go for 2-points it's 50/25/25. If you consider that the ties take you to overtime where you have a roughly 50/50 chance of winning or losing at that point, they become 50/0/50 for EPs and 62.5/0/37.5 for 2Ps.
In reality, the extra points perform even worse when you consider that extra points are less than 100% in reality while 2 points are almost exactly 50%. And if your chance of winning in overtime is less than 50%, it skews even harder towards two point tries.
[Quote: Originally Posted by 7out]No it’s not weird. Prevents a tie which will send them into overtime. Stop with the Qanon crap.[/Quote
Thats right! And you don’t want to play Brady in OT. Ask Falcon fans
[Quote: Originally Posted by 7out]No it’s not weird. Prevents a tie which will send them into overtime. Stop with the Qanon crap.[/Quote
Thats right! And you don’t want to play Brady in OT. Ask Falcon fans
@unplucked_gem
He missed a 46 yarder man. Hardly a chip shot unless you just started watching football in the past decade or so. I think we’ve been spoiled a bit too much by kickers in today’s age.
@unplucked_gem
He missed a 46 yarder man. Hardly a chip shot unless you just started watching football in the past decade or so. I think we’ve been spoiled a bit too much by kickers in today’s age.
I've heard many people claim the answer is to vote them out of office when things aren't going well...but you guys already did that last year...so what's plan C?
I've heard many people claim the answer is to vote them out of office when things aren't going well...but you guys already did that last year...so what's plan C?
shut ur shill azz up
shut ur shill azz up
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.