Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
I dont have the numbers in front of me but betting against Balt at home will get you killed they are a great home cover
31-6 as a HF
Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
I dont have the numbers in front of me but betting against Balt at home will get you killed they are a great home cover
31-6 as a HF
Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
I dont have the numbers in front of me but betting against Balt at home will get you killed they are a great home cover
31-6 as a HF
I found this system play I mentioned in the GB-Dallas game , though I have not updated the information since used late in 2006 ...The other aspect of this sytem play is that it seems to involve " good offensive teams " scoring between 23-27 PPG
so I am assuming that Dallas , presently averaging 34.5 ppg and Green Bay averaging 36 ppg are definitely out of that range ...
This may apply after a few weeks of play or only for teams in that scoring range ..
.( This is why I am not a big fan of these sytem and super system plays ...they can be manipulated to produce high percentage trends by having more variables )
Play Under - In any game involving 2 good offensive teams ( 23-27 PPG )
Results thus far>>>
53-23 ATS over last 5 seasons...68.8 %
The average total posted in these games was 44.3
The average total points scored in these games was 41.9
The situation's record in 2005-2006 is 9-6
In the last 3 seasons, the situation's record is 75-50
Since 1983, the situation's record is 161-116
Explanation: This is a totals System that proves how vulnerable the public can be, partcularly when 2 attractive offensive teams get together. As you can see, playing the under in games of this sort typically nets more than a 65 % winning percentage.
I found this system play I mentioned in the GB-Dallas game , though I have not updated the information since used late in 2006 ...The other aspect of this sytem play is that it seems to involve " good offensive teams " scoring between 23-27 PPG
so I am assuming that Dallas , presently averaging 34.5 ppg and Green Bay averaging 36 ppg are definitely out of that range ...
This may apply after a few weeks of play or only for teams in that scoring range ..
.( This is why I am not a big fan of these sytem and super system plays ...they can be manipulated to produce high percentage trends by having more variables )
Play Under - In any game involving 2 good offensive teams ( 23-27 PPG )
Results thus far>>>
53-23 ATS over last 5 seasons...68.8 %
The average total posted in these games was 44.3
The average total points scored in these games was 41.9
The situation's record in 2005-2006 is 9-6
In the last 3 seasons, the situation's record is 75-50
Since 1983, the situation's record is 161-116
Explanation: This is a totals System that proves how vulnerable the public can be, partcularly when 2 attractive offensive teams get together. As you can see, playing the under in games of this sort typically nets more than a 65 % winning percentage.
This system is to play on all home dogs off a SU away win, versus an opponent off a SU home win.
In this scenario >>>
Home dogs are 57-18 ATS ( 76 % ) in the past 10 years
I have not updated this trend for last year ...but Green Bay is a Home Dog that won SU last week vs Detroit facing a Dallas team that won @ home vs Philadelphia
This system is to play on all home dogs off a SU away win, versus an opponent off a SU home win.
In this scenario >>>
Home dogs are 57-18 ATS ( 76 % ) in the past 10 years
I have not updated this trend for last year ...but Green Bay is a Home Dog that won SU last week vs Detroit facing a Dallas team that won @ home vs Philadelphia
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||