Search forums
Search model icon

Spoke to a couple book managers and they both said tHere was a lot more bet on KC than Tampa. I find that hard to believe.

Participants:
Views: 279
Posts: 7
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2015
Posts: 3505
Posted: #1

I thought there would have been a lot more on Tampa.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1243
Posted: #2

Buff...c'mon man...the KC FLYING CIRCUS...the RED BARON and his flyboys were gonna CRUSH the old man and his overrated Bucs????

That was the narrative across the country...why would you find that hard to believe???

But then the KC FLY BOYS got their knickers pulled down and SPANKED by the Buccaneers!!!  So maybe you're trying to re-write the narrative LMAO.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 1302
Posted: #3

Who fucking cares

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 127405
Posted: #4

an_cry

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 585
Posted: #5

an_dance

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 585
Posted: #6

I won....I won....

moneybagan_woocheck my post 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 3304
Posted: #7

Buffer, the Daily Wager sports handicapping show put up a pie chart on most, if not all, of the days leading up to the Super Bowl.  KC had the bulk of the money and tickets wagered on them.  IIRC it was 56% or more.

Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo