Hey GREAT info,, I like the BAL Pick but im going to stay away from TEN, I know they had injurys in there secondary. I like the Giants Also is there any trends for them when coming off two losses? I dont think they will drop three in a row.
0
Hey GREAT info,, I like the BAL Pick but im going to stay away from TEN, I know they had injurys in there secondary. I like the Giants Also is there any trends for them when coming off two losses? I dont think they will drop three in a row.
RF, wouldn't Detroit fall under this trend too? Why aren't they a play?
All teams coming off a bye that are favored . Yes , Detroit falls under this category . My answer was in reference to the question about teams coming off a bye that are facing each other .
Tennessee and Jacksonville are both coming off a bye . Tennessee is favored . Baltimore and Denver are both coming off a bye . Baltimore is favored . Detroit is coming off a bye facing St Louis ( who is not ) Detroit is favored . Seattle is coming off a bye facing Dallas ( who is not ) Seattle is an underdog .
The teams that are favored coming off a bye this week are : Baltimore, Tennessee, Detroit
In light of the fact that there are 2 games this week where the teams involved are coming off a bye , I will post results from those matchups .
Secondly, In light of the fact that the three teams that qualify this week are small favorites , I will post results using those parameters ( something like teams fav <= 4 coming off abye )
Lastly, I believe you can't follow a trend halfway , or pick and chose what you like , because then all you're doing is looking for validation for what you already like and ignoring the rest .
Also, if you involve other variables , you are missing the point .
Part of the object of this thread was to locate a gem or two along the way that was simple and easily verifiable .
Post-bye week teams were once a good bet against , and I have posted concrete numbers from another site involving a number of years going into the 2001 season were that the case .
For the past 4 years ( 2008-2009 ) ( 2007-2008) 2006-2007) checked by yours truly & ( 2005-2006 ) provided by another poster , favorites coming off a bye week have been I don't care who they are playing , where they are playing , who is hurt, what the weather is like , or anything else because these teams ( over 100 of them ! ) have covered over 70 % of the time .
This trend won't last forever and it may end this week . In the meantime , I am on the lookout for the next one > Do what you want with the information , but don't forget :
K.I.S.S.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sho$money:
RF, wouldn't Detroit fall under this trend too? Why aren't they a play?
All teams coming off a bye that are favored . Yes , Detroit falls under this category . My answer was in reference to the question about teams coming off a bye that are facing each other .
Tennessee and Jacksonville are both coming off a bye . Tennessee is favored . Baltimore and Denver are both coming off a bye . Baltimore is favored . Detroit is coming off a bye facing St Louis ( who is not ) Detroit is favored . Seattle is coming off a bye facing Dallas ( who is not ) Seattle is an underdog .
The teams that are favored coming off a bye this week are : Baltimore, Tennessee, Detroit
In light of the fact that there are 2 games this week where the teams involved are coming off a bye , I will post results from those matchups .
Secondly, In light of the fact that the three teams that qualify this week are small favorites , I will post results using those parameters ( something like teams fav <= 4 coming off abye )
Lastly, I believe you can't follow a trend halfway , or pick and chose what you like , because then all you're doing is looking for validation for what you already like and ignoring the rest .
Also, if you involve other variables , you are missing the point .
Part of the object of this thread was to locate a gem or two along the way that was simple and easily verifiable .
Post-bye week teams were once a good bet against , and I have posted concrete numbers from another site involving a number of years going into the 2001 season were that the case .
For the past 4 years ( 2008-2009 ) ( 2007-2008) 2006-2007) checked by yours truly & ( 2005-2006 ) provided by another poster , favorites coming off a bye week have been I don't care who they are playing , where they are playing , who is hurt, what the weather is like , or anything else because these teams ( over 100 of them ! ) have covered over 70 % of the time .
This trend won't last forever and it may end this week . In the meantime , I am on the lookout for the next one > Do what you want with the information , but don't forget :
1) Results for teams coming off a bye facing each other 2) Results for teams coming off a bye and favored by <= 4
I am only checking last year's results :
1) Teams facing each other off abye
Week 5 : Seattle @ NYG - 7 ( both off a bye ) NYG win 44-6 ( Favored teams wins ATS )
Week 8 : Atlanta @ Philadelphia -9.5 ( both off abye ) Philadelphia wins 27-14 ( Favored team wins ATS )
Week 11: Dallas -1 @ Washington ( both off a bye ) Dallas wins 14-10 ( Favored team wins ATS )
Results : Teams off a bye facing each other resulted in the favored team going 3-0 ATS
2) Favs of <= 4 coming off a bye :
Week 3 : Baltimore -1 won 28-10 ( wins ATS ) Note : The Baltimore & Houston game was canceled in week 2 , so that became their bye week Week 5 : Indianapolis - 3 won 31-27 ( wins ATS ) New England - 3 won 30-21 ( wins ATS ) Week 8 : Denver - 4 lost 17-26 ( Lost ATS ) Week 10 : Dallas - 1 won 14-10 ( Won ATS ) Tampa Bay - 4.5 won 19-13 ( Won ATS )
2) Results Favs of <= 4 were 5-1 ATS last year
******************************
0
1) Results for teams coming off a bye facing each other 2) Results for teams coming off a bye and favored by <= 4
I am only checking last year's results :
1) Teams facing each other off abye
Week 5 : Seattle @ NYG - 7 ( both off a bye ) NYG win 44-6 ( Favored teams wins ATS )
Week 8 : Atlanta @ Philadelphia -9.5 ( both off abye ) Philadelphia wins 27-14 ( Favored team wins ATS )
Week 11: Dallas -1 @ Washington ( both off a bye ) Dallas wins 14-10 ( Favored team wins ATS )
Results : Teams off a bye facing each other resulted in the favored team going 3-0 ATS
2) Favs of <= 4 coming off a bye :
Week 3 : Baltimore -1 won 28-10 ( wins ATS ) Note : The Baltimore & Houston game was canceled in week 2 , so that became their bye week Week 5 : Indianapolis - 3 won 31-27 ( wins ATS ) New England - 3 won 30-21 ( wins ATS ) Week 8 : Denver - 4 lost 17-26 ( Lost ATS ) Week 10 : Dallas - 1 won 14-10 ( Won ATS ) Tampa Bay - 4.5 won 19-13 ( Won ATS )
Now ...going back to the after-bye week trend ... If you're looking to break these 3 teams up , I'll throw some information out there : Backing Denver >> Denver is 9-2 ATS past 11 after a bye ( 0-1 ATS LY ) Undefeated teams off a bye are 29-8-1 ATS ( not my #'s ) ( 1-0 YTD with New Orleans covering )
There is some irony here :
Tennessee is winless coming off a bye ( 0-6 SU/ATS ) Denver is undefeated coming off a bye ( 6-0 SU/ATS )
It was only a year ago when we were talking about Tennessee being undefeated ( 7-0 SU / ATS at the time ) facing the Green Bay Packers who were coming off a bye week . It was week 9 Tennessee @ home was favored by 3.5 points over/under was 41.5
Tennessee won that game in dramatic fashion against Green Bay 19-16 extending their winning streak to 8-0 SUbut suffering their first ATS defeat by half a point . ( now 1-7 ATS )
Fast forward to 2009 and Tennessee finds itself @ home in week 8 trying to get is first win both SU & ATS. What a difference a year makes !
This year it is the Denver Broncos who find themselves where the Titans were last year , still undefeated both SU/ATS
The line for Denver playing Baltimore this week is eerily similar to the Tennessee-GB line of last year . Denver ( 6-0 SU/ATS ) is 3.5 point favorites and the Over/Under is 41
This may definitely be a week to consider buying half a point
0
Now ...going back to the after-bye week trend ... If you're looking to break these 3 teams up , I'll throw some information out there : Backing Denver >> Denver is 9-2 ATS past 11 after a bye ( 0-1 ATS LY ) Undefeated teams off a bye are 29-8-1 ATS ( not my #'s ) ( 1-0 YTD with New Orleans covering )
There is some irony here :
Tennessee is winless coming off a bye ( 0-6 SU/ATS ) Denver is undefeated coming off a bye ( 6-0 SU/ATS )
It was only a year ago when we were talking about Tennessee being undefeated ( 7-0 SU / ATS at the time ) facing the Green Bay Packers who were coming off a bye week . It was week 9 Tennessee @ home was favored by 3.5 points over/under was 41.5
Tennessee won that game in dramatic fashion against Green Bay 19-16 extending their winning streak to 8-0 SUbut suffering their first ATS defeat by half a point . ( now 1-7 ATS )
Fast forward to 2009 and Tennessee finds itself @ home in week 8 trying to get is first win both SU & ATS. What a difference a year makes !
This year it is the Denver Broncos who find themselves where the Titans were last year , still undefeated both SU/ATS
The line for Denver playing Baltimore this week is eerily similar to the Tennessee-GB line of last year . Denver ( 6-0 SU/ATS ) is 3.5 point favorites and the Over/Under is 41
This may definitely be a week to consider buying half a point
Do you believe in reincarantions ? If you don't , maybe you should
Tennessee has yet to show any signs of life , but that's because the Titans really perished and have been reincarnated as the Denver Broncos this year.
No respect, stifling defense , solid special teams, game manager in the qb position , flying under the radar, winning close games and 6-0 SU/ATS and counting ....
It must be the same team !
All kidding aside , let me point out an uncanny parallel between these teams thus far .
Denver Broncos of 2009 Tennessee Titans of 2008
Points given up by Denver after 6 weeks of play : 7,6,3,10,17,23 = 66 points for an average of 11 PPG
Points given up by Tennessee last year through 6 weeks of play : 10,7,12,17,10,10 = 66 points for an average of 11 PPG
Wow , no argument there ... These teams have given up precisely the same amount of points through 6 games played !
*********************
0
Do you believe in reincarantions ? If you don't , maybe you should
Tennessee has yet to show any signs of life , but that's because the Titans really perished and have been reincarnated as the Denver Broncos this year.
No respect, stifling defense , solid special teams, game manager in the qb position , flying under the radar, winning close games and 6-0 SU/ATS and counting ....
It must be the same team !
All kidding aside , let me point out an uncanny parallel between these teams thus far .
Denver Broncos of 2009 Tennessee Titans of 2008
Points given up by Denver after 6 weeks of play : 7,6,3,10,17,23 = 66 points for an average of 11 PPG
Points given up by Tennessee last year through 6 weeks of play : 10,7,12,17,10,10 = 66 points for an average of 11 PPG
Wow , no argument there ... These teams have given up precisely the same amount of points through 6 games played !
Until recently teams that were playing B2B road games and would lose the first game SU were very good sides to be on the second road game .
Last 3 full seasons ( 2006-2008 ) teams that played B2Broad games and lost first SU were 65-38 ATS ( 63.1 % )on their second road game .
That percentage is a good estimate as I checked all of last year's teams that played B2B road games and the teams that lost the first road game SU were 26-11 ATS the following road game .
I added these numbers to the ones posted on the article >>>
2006 : 19-10 ATS
2007 : 20-17 ATS
That's how i arrived at 65-38 ATS .
This year, however this trend has started on the opposite end > So far , teams playing B2B road games are 3-9 ATS YTD after losing first road game SU
Latest victim was Chicago which lost @ Atlanta , and then got smoked @ Cincinnati The list of teams : Atlanta Lost SU @ NE then won ATS @ SF Carolina lost SU @ Atlanta then lost ATS @ Dallas Chicago lost SU @ Atlanta then lost ATS @ Cincinnati Cleveland lost SU @ Denver then lost ATS @ Baltimore
Dallas lost SU @ Denver then lost ATS @ Kansas City
Houston lost SU @ Arizona then won ATS @ Cincinnati NYJ lost SU @ NO then lost ATS @ Miami Oak lost SU @ Houston then lost ATS @ NYG Phil lost SU Oakland then won ATS @ Wash PITT lost SU @ Chicago then lost ATS @ Cin
TB lost SU Wash then lost ATS @ Phil
Tenn lost SU @ NY Jets then lost ATS @ Jacksonville
Week 8 >>
Minnesota Vikings lost SU @ Pittsburgh then ??? @ Green Bay
SF lost SU @ Houston then ??? @ Indianapolis
I would like to see where this ends up . It may just be that as the season progresses with lines getting tighter and most of the teams in this scenario being dogs that it becomes a good play . I am thinking that this might be a good trend in the second half this year. We'll see.
0
Until recently teams that were playing B2B road games and would lose the first game SU were very good sides to be on the second road game .
Last 3 full seasons ( 2006-2008 ) teams that played B2Broad games and lost first SU were 65-38 ATS ( 63.1 % )on their second road game .
That percentage is a good estimate as I checked all of last year's teams that played B2B road games and the teams that lost the first road game SU were 26-11 ATS the following road game .
I added these numbers to the ones posted on the article >>>
2006 : 19-10 ATS
2007 : 20-17 ATS
That's how i arrived at 65-38 ATS .
This year, however this trend has started on the opposite end > So far , teams playing B2B road games are 3-9 ATS YTD after losing first road game SU
Latest victim was Chicago which lost @ Atlanta , and then got smoked @ Cincinnati The list of teams : Atlanta Lost SU @ NE then won ATS @ SF Carolina lost SU @ Atlanta then lost ATS @ Dallas Chicago lost SU @ Atlanta then lost ATS @ Cincinnati Cleveland lost SU @ Denver then lost ATS @ Baltimore
Dallas lost SU @ Denver then lost ATS @ Kansas City
Houston lost SU @ Arizona then won ATS @ Cincinnati NYJ lost SU @ NO then lost ATS @ Miami Oak lost SU @ Houston then lost ATS @ NYG Phil lost SU Oakland then won ATS @ Wash PITT lost SU @ Chicago then lost ATS @ Cin
TB lost SU Wash then lost ATS @ Phil
Tenn lost SU @ NY Jets then lost ATS @ Jacksonville
Week 8 >>
Minnesota Vikings lost SU @ Pittsburgh then ??? @ Green Bay
SF lost SU @ Houston then ??? @ Indianapolis
I would like to see where this ends up . It may just be that as the season progresses with lines getting tighter and most of the teams in this scenario being dogs that it becomes a good play . I am thinking that this might be a good trend in the second half this year. We'll see.
:This is not a prime spot to back the Texans (who are the only road favorite this week in the NFL), as Houston owns a 4-16 ATS mark in franchise history on the road off a home win. Also, the Texans have struggled against the AFC East recently, going 0-6 ATS their last six, including a Week 1 loss at home to the Jets as a three-point favorite.
The Bills have somehow scratched out victories the last two weeks, beating the Jets in overtime, then holding off the Panthers in Charlotte. Under Dick Jauron, Buffalo is 6-1 ATS as a home underdog off a SU 'dog win, winning outright as seven-point underdogs last week at Carolina "
:This is not a prime spot to back the Texans (who are the only road favorite this week in the NFL), as Houston owns a 4-16 ATS mark in franchise history on the road off a home win. Also, the Texans have struggled against the AFC East recently, going 0-6 ATS their last six, including a Week 1 loss at home to the Jets as a three-point favorite.
The Bills have somehow scratched out victories the last two weeks, beating the Jets in overtime, then holding off the Panthers in Charlotte. Under Dick Jauron, Buffalo is 6-1 ATS as a home underdog off a SU 'dog win, winning outright as seven-point underdogs last week at Carolina "
These guys and their YPPT system got me thinking, when I first came accross YPPT I just looked at the offensive stats, and use it for different things when capping.
But I went and checked an original use of it to see how it's done so far... it applies to the bottom 5 ranked teams in terms of offensive YPPT.
keeping in mind they change every week (I'm just going off the statfox #'s as well)
The bottom 5 teams are 7-19 ATS this year, and 1-6 when favoured. That one win was NE in week 3 when they were ranked 28th but lets be real the Pats are not a bottom 5 YPPT team. So I sort of look at it as a perfect trend or sorts.
This week the bottom 5 teams are:
CLE (29th) STL (32nd) OAK (31st) TEN (30) who are favs so they meet the sub group.
I don't remember ever seeing so many bottom 5 teams favoured and you guys can clearly see why. They shouldn't be laying points to anyone.
So the play would be on JAX who are 3-0 ATS vs. their division.
But this contradicts the favs off a bye trend with the Titans
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
What is your trend?
These guys and their YPPT system got me thinking, when I first came accross YPPT I just looked at the offensive stats, and use it for different things when capping.
But I went and checked an original use of it to see how it's done so far... it applies to the bottom 5 ranked teams in terms of offensive YPPT.
keeping in mind they change every week (I'm just going off the statfox #'s as well)
The bottom 5 teams are 7-19 ATS this year, and 1-6 when favoured. That one win was NE in week 3 when they were ranked 28th but lets be real the Pats are not a bottom 5 YPPT team. So I sort of look at it as a perfect trend or sorts.
This week the bottom 5 teams are:
CLE (29th) STL (32nd) OAK (31st) TEN (30) who are favs so they meet the sub group.
I don't remember ever seeing so many bottom 5 teams favoured and you guys can clearly see why. They shouldn't be laying points to anyone.
So the play would be on JAX who are 3-0 ATS vs. their division.
But this contradicts the favs off a bye trend with the Titans
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.