All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

NFL Week 13

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13179
Posts: 94
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #1
46-30 YTD with New England +3 (7) Tonight...

Recap week 12..
Thursday and Sunday...

New England +3 (7)
Houston +3.5 (5)
Buffalo +3 (4)
Washington +9 (3)
Dallas/Oakland Under 40.5 (3)
Pittsburgh +9 (3)
Denver +4.5 (2)
Tennessee/Arizona Under 46 (2)
Detroit +10.5 (2)
Carolina +3.5 (1)
Detroit +450 (1)


Too early to talk NFL for week 13.  I think not.  Bengals couldn't really ask for a better situation then they are in at the moment.  They are currently 2 games ahead of both the Steelers and the Ravens.  3 if you count tie breakers.  Which means at 8-3 and them at 6-5, they only have to win 3 out of 5 games to ensure a clinch.  Guess what they have the lowly Lions this week, and still play the Chiefs.  Other than that though the schedule kinda brutal @ SD, and @ Minnesota, maybe steal one of those.  @ The Jets to end the season, may need that game to win the division.  Anyways looking at the lines I see the Bengals are again a big favorite this weekend.  13 points.  I stayed away from them against the Browns, I knew that the line was too much.  But this weekend...

First play

Cincinnati -13 (10)

Another big play on the Bengals for you guys.  Haven't missed a play on the Bengals since week 1.  Have had multiple big plays on them, and have stayed away from the games I thought were suspect, because of course I can't bet against them.  Take it for what its worth, but the Bengals are going to roll here.  34-14.

Other Leans:

Tennessee +7
Kansas City +4.5

Haven't really looked into too many.  Just started but this play is a winner.  Good luck...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42643
Posted: #2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 42
Posted: #3
Had the same leans..

I also like the over in the Cinn/Det Game and the Giants as a PK

What way do you think the line are going to move that you have posted?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1287
Posted: #4

and should the Bears be laying that much? looking at taking +9

Is SD better than Cinci? lookin at -13

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1287
Posted: #5
you think I can get some + points this week.......
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 762
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Whodeysb09:

46-30 YTD with New England +3 (7) Tonight...

Recap week 12..
Thursday and Sunday...

New England +3 (7)
Houston +3.5 (5)
Buffalo +3 (4)
Washington +9 (3)
Dallas/Oakland Under 40.5 (3)
Pittsburgh +9 (3)
Denver +4.5 (2)
Tennessee/Arizona Under 46 (2)
Detroit +10.5 (2)
Carolina +3.5 (1)
Detroit +450 (1)


Too early to talk NFL for week 13.  I think not.  Bengals couldn't really ask for a better situation then they are in at the moment.  They are currently 2 games ahead of both the Steelers and the Ravens.  3 if you count tie breakers.  Which means at 8-3 and them at 6-5, they only have to win 3 out of 5 games to ensure a clinch.  Guess what they have the lowly Lions this week, and still play the Chiefs.  Other than that though the schedule kinda brutal @ SD, and @ Minnesota, maybe steal one of those.  @ The Jets to end the season, may need that game to win the division.  Anyways looking at the lines I see the Bengals are again a big favorite this weekend.  13 points.  I stayed away from them against the Browns, I knew that the line was too much.  But this weekend...

First play

Cincinnati -13 (10)

Another big play on the Bengals for you guys.  Haven't missed a play on the Bengals since week 1.  Have had multiple big plays on them, and have stayed away from the games I thought were suspect, because of course I can't bet against them.  Take it for what its worth, but the Bengals are going to roll here.  34-14.

Other Leans:

Tennessee +7
Kansas City +4.5

Haven't really looked into too many.  Just started but this play is a winner.  Good luck...

but the 'lowly lions' are better than the lowly Raiders, and the Chiefs beat the Raiders, AND Bengals did not exactly 'dominate' the Browns (absolute worse team in the NFL)... I would not sit back smoking a cigar just yet..lol...BOL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 35
Posted: #7

Thanks for your plays WhoDey. 

About the Week 12 Patriots play would you take a ML or +1.5 line for 7 units still ?

BOL with the Cincinnati play, will be tailing you on this 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by renroh123:

but the 'lowly lions' are better than the lowly Raiders, and the Chiefs beat the Raiders, AND Bengals did not exactly 'dominate' the Browns (absolute worse team in the NFL)... I would not sit back smoking a cigar just yet..lol...BOL



You really play the ifs and buts game...if its and buts were candy and nuts it would be Christmas all year long.  I can't believe I saw this.  This team beat this team crap...if you look at games that way you really should change.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by briantabitha:

and should the Bears be laying that much? looking at taking +9

Is SD better than Cinci? lookin at -13



I was looking at Cleveland and St. Louis as well..Thought about them both..Still haven't gotten into any of them just yet.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by saka:

Thanks for your plays WhoDey. 

About the Week 12 Patriots play would you take a ML or +1.5 line for 7 units still ?

BOL with the Cincinnati play, will be tailing you on this 



1.5 probably 3 U's...Probably 2 on the ML.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 762
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by Whodeysb09:



You really play the ifs and buts game...if its and buts were candy and nuts it would be Christmas all year long.  I can't believe I saw this.  This team beat this team crap...if you look at games that way you really should change.

I am not sure what you are referrencing as far as the "ifs, and buts"; I thought I was just stating the facts.  I must have missed something.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 25135
Posted: #12
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1413
Posted: #13
End of the day its gambling. WhoDey seems fairly confident otherwise he wouldn't bet 10U. yea its a risk, this can go wrong that can go wrong, but its making an informed decision how strong the play it is, at what odds and whether the excede your confidence levels. How much you willing to gamble or gamble or not is your choice
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 35
Posted: #14
Thanks for the reply WhoDey.

Lets go Patriots! get us some cash so we can
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1413
Posted: #15
PATRIOTS this week BENGALS NXT WEEK


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by renroh123:

I am not sure what you are referrencing as far as the "ifs, and buts"; I thought I was just stating the facts.  I must have missed something.



You are saying well one team beat this team so another team should beat this team.  That's just not the way it works.  The NFL comes down to match ups more than anything.  Cincinnati is a very bad matchup for Detroit.  Just like every other team in the NFC North with the exception of the Vikings.  So basically your saying this.  Well Pittsburgh beat Minnesota right, so that means the Bengals should beat Minnesota right?  That's basically what I got out of your post.  I'm not sitting back and smoking a cigar.  I do see what your saying now, I thought you were referring to something else.  We should beat those teams...We have KC and Detroit @ Home.  Should be no problem.  The KC game has Larry Johnson 200+ written all over it.  I'm not smoking the cigar yet, I knew we were going to struggle with the Raiders, we always no matter what struggle on the West Coast.  We played horribly, and let a 14-0 lead slip away.  We tend to play a Quarter and quit.  I thought you were referring to this game.  I'm sorry I kind of read that out of context.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by saka:

Thanks for the reply WhoDey.

Lets go Patriots! get us some cash so we can




GSP10 -
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #18

I'm shocked U don't like Green Bay -2.5...Extra rest,Ravens off a very physical Sunday night game.....Thank goodness the Ravens have put Webb in at CB...Washington getting hurt gave him his shot..Foxworth still can't cover a cheap suit...It was insane at the game last night...Ravens need 2 go 4-1 to make the playoffs,the division is yours,hope 2 C U at PBS in January....I might fly up.if they get the chance...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2004
Posts: 4439
Posted: #19
Shrimp where do you see a line for next Monday night's game?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #20
It was in the USA today this a.m....
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by shrimp1958:

I'm shocked U don't like Green Bay -2.5...Extra rest,Ravens off a very physical Sunday night game.....Thank goodness the Ravens have put Webb in at CB...Washington getting hurt gave him his shot..Foxworth still can't cover a cheap suit...It was insane at the game last night...Ravens need 2 go 4-1 to make the playoffs,the division is yours,hope 2 C U at PBS in January....I might fly up.if they get the chance...



I hadn't even began to look into that game yet
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #22
Add:

New York Giants +115 (3)

Miami +4.5 (3)

Eagles/Falcons Under 44 (4)
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #23
Thursday Night:

New York Jets -3 (5)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 177
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Whodeysb09:

Thursday Night:

New York Jets -3 (5)

bills 
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by illestnoise:


bills 


Good Luck
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.