Just too much in the Super Bowl in what should be a tight game. The dogs have covered 6 of the last 8 Super Bowls including 3 times in which the fav won by 3 or 4 but didn't cover.
I hate when people find facts that are useless except to just make their reasoning make sense. How about go about it like this
Last four Super Bowls Dogs 2 Favs 2
Last 20 Favorites have covered 10 and Dogs 8 with 2 pushes
Nice attempt though and good luck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
I already took +4.5 -104
Just too much in the Super Bowl in what should be a tight game. The dogs have covered 6 of the last 8 Super Bowls including 3 times in which the fav won by 3 or 4 but didn't cover.
I hate when people find facts that are useless except to just make their reasoning make sense. How about go about it like this
Last four Super Bowls Dogs 2 Favs 2
Last 20 Favorites have covered 10 and Dogs 8 with 2 pushes
how about this....you'd be a fucking moron not to take the Colts minus the current 4.5.....ML -210 is even reasonable for the vaginas out there.......Manning and company aren't losing this one, and the line will very likely not be in play
Told you dude....you're a DOUCHE in every single post you make.
Fuck off. Icapsports is about as misleading as you telling people you arent gay.
Van-good stuff bro
0
Quote Originally Posted by ICAPSports:
how about this....you'd be a fucking moron not to take the Colts minus the current 4.5.....ML -210 is even reasonable for the vaginas out there.......Manning and company aren't losing this one, and the line will very likely not be in play
Told you dude....you're a DOUCHE in every single post you make.
Fuck off. Icapsports is about as misleading as you telling people you arent gay.
Even if Indy goes out front and is up by 2 tds they will prevent, give up a TD and a FG to win by 4 points. A win is a win to them...
Think N.O. may just be a little to nervous for this game. And lets face it, when they ran into good teams, even at Home Dallas, Minn. They were beat. Minn gave that game away. Indy is the better team. I am cheering for N.O.
Good luck Van... Thanks for all the great input this year. See ya next year.
0
6 today.... Hard to pass up 6 points...
Even if Indy goes out front and is up by 2 tds they will prevent, give up a TD and a FG to win by 4 points. A win is a win to them...
Think N.O. may just be a little to nervous for this game. And lets face it, when they ran into good teams, even at Home Dallas, Minn. They were beat. Minn gave that game away. Indy is the better team. I am cheering for N.O.
Good luck Van... Thanks for all the great input this year. See ya next year.
This game has all the makings of a Colts blow out. The Saints are overratted at this point in the season. Thier only here because of Farve's mistake! I see the Colts winning this one easy. Peyton is going to but on a clinic!! Colts by at least 7.
0
This game has all the makings of a Colts blow out. The Saints are overratted at this point in the season. Thier only here because of Farve's mistake! I see the Colts winning this one easy. Peyton is going to but on a clinic!! Colts by at least 7.
I have it at an average of -104. My preferred choice would be to sell it at +4 and just pocket the difference. But I will take the absolute best price I can get, at any line 4+.
In other words, if I can get +115 on N.O. +4, but can get +6 at -102, I would take the +6.
Basically I will sell to the highest bidder..... Based on the combination of line and price.
put your bet on e bay, then spell intelect in 20 words or less
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
It is not a stupid question....
I have it at an average of -104. My preferred choice would be to sell it at +4 and just pocket the difference. But I will take the absolute best price I can get, at any line 4+.
In other words, if I can get +115 on N.O. +4, but can get +6 at -102, I would take the +6.
Basically I will sell to the highest bidder..... Based on the combination of line and price.
put your bet on e bay, then spell intelect in 20 words or less
I already made money on this game and it hasnt even started. You could have too, if you would have read this thread early enough and reacted.
How did you already make money? If you won your colts bet at -104 and lost all the saints bet, wouldn't you just break even? Or lose money if you're laying juice on the saints.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
I already made money on this game and it hasnt even started. You could have too, if you would have read this thread early enough and reacted.
How did you already make money? If you won your colts bet at -104 and lost all the saints bet, wouldn't you just break even? Or lose money if you're laying juice on the saints.
I'm really sorry. I jumped in deep into this thread, I'll go back and catch up.
No problems - let me give you the short version.....
If I have a bet on anyone, it will be a small bet on N.O. although I might just sit it out. I will be selling my initial bet on the Colts -4 soon, and probably just take that profit and call it a season.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:
I'm really sorry. I jumped in deep into this thread, I'll go back and catch up.
No problems - let me give you the short version.....
If I have a bet on anyone, it will be a small bet on N.O. although I might just sit it out. I will be selling my initial bet on the Colts -4 soon, and probably just take that profit and call it a season.
As you guys go to work this week - tell me if you dont hear this conversation - you know - from the moron football fans at your work....
"The colts will kill the Saints. WIthout that coinflip, they would have lost to the vikings with 5 turnovers!! The saints only had like 280 yards!!"
hilarious cuz i heard that "reasoning" a million times..... also heard about how much better manning is than brees, like that matters, the fact is brees is a master of his offense just like manning is, both will perform well.... one important thing i believe people are overlooking is the fact that minnesota was the best and most complete team in the nfl (just my opinion) but literally choked at the most important times vs the saints.... people too much stock in being undefeated and automatically think the colts blow everyone out.... flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense.... in my opinion, indy is in for a rude awakening when they see this saints offense (the best in the league).... the saints + points all day for me...
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
As you guys go to work this week - tell me if you dont hear this conversation - you know - from the moron football fans at your work....
"The colts will kill the Saints. WIthout that coinflip, they would have lost to the vikings with 5 turnovers!! The saints only had like 280 yards!!"
hilarious cuz i heard that "reasoning" a million times..... also heard about how much better manning is than brees, like that matters, the fact is brees is a master of his offense just like manning is, both will perform well.... one important thing i believe people are overlooking is the fact that minnesota was the best and most complete team in the nfl (just my opinion) but literally choked at the most important times vs the saints.... people too much stock in being undefeated and automatically think the colts blow everyone out.... flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense.... in my opinion, indy is in for a rude awakening when they see this saints offense (the best in the league).... the saints + points all day for me...
No problems - let me give you the short version.....
If I have a bet on anyone, it will be a small bet on N.O. although I might just sit it out. I will be selling my initial bet on the Colts -4 soon, and probably just take that profit and call it a season.
Van,
Could you please tell me what this means ? Selling your bet and getting a profit. Yes,,, i am one of the schmucks that knows nothing. But I am also willing to learn and listen.
Please !
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
No problems - let me give you the short version.....
If I have a bet on anyone, it will be a small bet on N.O. although I might just sit it out. I will be selling my initial bet on the Colts -4 soon, and probably just take that profit and call it a season.
Van,
Could you please tell me what this means ? Selling your bet and getting a profit. Yes,,, i am one of the schmucks that knows nothing. But I am also willing to learn and listen.
I like both QBs but agree Brees looked lost a lot during his last game. I had Minn plus 4 and over, so I won both bets even tho Minn gave the game away. I was pulling for Brett Favre. Even tho I like both QBs I think the smart money will be on the Colts for a lot of reasons, but primarily because Peyton will just eat the Saints' secondary up IMO. Remember Jets were up 17-6 at halftime and didn't score in 2nd half. Indy D is better than a lot of folks give them credit for "all of a sudden". It was not that way a couple years ago as they could not stop the run. This just might be a run away game if Brees doens't play better than last game and I doubt Indy is gonna have 5 turnovers! Just my thoughts!
0
I like both QBs but agree Brees looked lost a lot during his last game. I had Minn plus 4 and over, so I won both bets even tho Minn gave the game away. I was pulling for Brett Favre. Even tho I like both QBs I think the smart money will be on the Colts for a lot of reasons, but primarily because Peyton will just eat the Saints' secondary up IMO. Remember Jets were up 17-6 at halftime and didn't score in 2nd half. Indy D is better than a lot of folks give them credit for "all of a sudden". It was not that way a couple years ago as they could not stop the run. This just might be a run away game if Brees doens't play better than last game and I doubt Indy is gonna have 5 turnovers! Just my thoughts!
" flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense..."
vanzack,
I noticed the Saints offense wasn't on the feild much in the 2nd half either. Being as I had bet on them, I couldn't help but observe several failures to convert on 3rd and short. One less turnover by Vikes in that half and Brees would've been in Miami throwing to Desean Jackson and Miles Austin.
0
" flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense..."
vanzack,
I noticed the Saints offense wasn't on the feild much in the 2nd half either. Being as I had bet on them, I couldn't help but observe several failures to convert on 3rd and short. One less turnover by Vikes in that half and Brees would've been in Miami throwing to Desean Jackson and Miles Austin.
" flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense..."
vanzack,
I noticed the Saints offense wasn't on the feild much in the 2nd half either. Being as I had bet on them, I couldn't help but observe several failures to convert on 3rd and short. One less turnover by Vikes in that half and Brees would've been in Miami throwing to Desean Jackson and Miles Austin.
OK - but the quote you make above wasnt from me.
GL
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mischkin04:
" flacco and sanchez werent good enough to keep their teams on the field in order to "neutralize" the colts offense..."
vanzack,
I noticed the Saints offense wasn't on the feild much in the 2nd half either. Being as I had bet on them, I couldn't help but observe several failures to convert on 3rd and short. One less turnover by Vikes in that half and Brees would've been in Miami throwing to Desean Jackson and Miles Austin.
I have been watching this line closely and my bookie currently is offering - 4 1/2 at - 105 and -5 at +105 - 5 1/2 +115... I have said from the beginning that I wanted -4 at -105, but I don't want to be greedy... Thinking about locking in -5 at +105, This line has come down but I expect it will go back up.
0
I have been watching this line closely and my bookie currently is offering - 4 1/2 at - 105 and -5 at +105 - 5 1/2 +115... I have said from the beginning that I wanted -4 at -105, but I don't want to be greedy... Thinking about locking in -5 at +105, This line has come down but I expect it will go back up.
I have been watching this line closely and my bookie currently is offering - 4 1/2 at - 105 and -5 at +105 - 5 1/2 +115... I have said from the beginning that I wanted -4 at -105, but I don't want to be greedy... Thinking about locking in -5 at +105, This line has come down but I expect it will go back up.
I dont think it is going back up.
I said from the beginning, open at -4, go to -6, come back to -4.
Anything can happen, but if I had to wager, I think you have seen the last of anything north of 5.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
I have been watching this line closely and my bookie currently is offering - 4 1/2 at - 105 and -5 at +105 - 5 1/2 +115... I have said from the beginning that I wanted -4 at -105, but I don't want to be greedy... Thinking about locking in -5 at +105, This line has come down but I expect it will go back up.
I dont think it is going back up.
I said from the beginning, open at -4, go to -6, come back to -4.
Anything can happen, but if I had to wager, I think you have seen the last of anything north of 5.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.