All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

If you dont bet on the Eagles....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3066
Posts: 76
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 218
Posted: #51
FCKKKKKKK YEAHHHHHHHHHHH
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 218
Posted: #52
7 POINT LEAD!!!!!!HELL YEAH!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 253
Posted: #53
Oops.... Eagles Td.... 

Back to your gmen thread sir.... 

Run along now, tx again 4 stopping by.... You sir are a covers legend
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 8856
Posted: #54
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #55

haha, a lot of you haters came out of the woodwork when it started to turn there....where you at now? ill be celebrating by 2.2k, while you re-evaluate how you cap

congrats philly backers.

 

1-0-1 tonight..+$2150

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #56
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60080
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

haha, a lot of you haters came out of the woodwork when it started to turn there....where you at now? ill be celebrating by 2.2k, while you re-evaluate how you cap

congrats philly backers.

 

1-0-1 tonight..+$2150

 

Im right here.

My comment has nothing to do with the score of the game at the time, or the score now, or the score ever.

It has to do with the ridiculous statement that you made in the original post - that somehow if you bet the Giants (or anyone for that matter) that you need to "reevaluate how you cap" - like there is only one side to any bet.  Please.

It is an amateur comment, and you are obviously a square.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #58
man... how stupid do you look after winning that freakishly flukey game, after claiming that those who do not have Philly need to re-evaluate?

please dude... you were on the wrong side and got a horseshit win... i say... YOU need to re-evaluate how you cap games...


and by the way, since you are the tard who started the Manningham thread... Mario Manningham plays for the Giants... you got a lot of nerve telling other people to re-evaluate when you don't even know which players play for which teams...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

haha, a lot of you haters came out of the woodwork when it started to turn there....where you at now? ill be celebrating by 2.2k, while you re-evaluate how you cap

congrats philly backers.

 

1-0-1 tonight..+$2150

 




re-evaluate how you cap, huh?


got a prop for you... me and you, 10 games this week... loser doesn't ever post on this forum again... let's see who needs to re-evaluate after i beat you by 6 games on a 10 game card...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

Im right here.

My comment has nothing to do with the score of the game at the time, or the score now, or the score ever.

It has to do with the ridiculous statement that you made in the original post - that somehow if you bet the Giants (or anyone for that matter) that you need to "reevaluate how you cap" - like there is only one side to any bet.  Please.

It is an amateur comment, and you are obviously a square.

vaz, i like you brother, been around for longer than my info says, and i always enjoy your threads, on or off topic...so i wont argue with you here...its meant to stir a little debate, and also meant to stress to take the eagles tonight...confidence belittles confidence...if people catch my confidence, whether it be through arrogant statements as such or words falling off sweet rose petals, its meant to catch the attention....if u see my threads, i have been very confident in about 5 plays in the NFL this season, and have been 4-1 in these, the one loss being the pats earlier today by a half point...my titles are arrogant, my posts within such are arrogant, but its meant to make people money...

GL with your bets this week..

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 25392
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

Im right here.

My comment has nothing to do with the score of the game at the time, or the score now, or the score ever.

It has to do with the ridiculous statement that you made in the original post - that somehow if you bet the Giants (or anyone for that matter) that you need to "reevaluate how you cap" - like there is only one side to any bet.  Please.

It is an amateur comment, and you are obviously a square.

Right on vanzack. We have a "prospect" here trying to school people on handicapping? Interesting...

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 25392
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:

man... how stupid do you look after winning that freakishly flukey game, after claiming that those who do not have Philly need to re-evaluate?

please dude... you were on the wrong side and got a horseshit win... i say... YOU need to re-evaluate how you cap games...


and by the way, since you are the tard who started the Manningham thread... Mario Manningham plays for the Giants... you got a lot of nerve telling other people to re-evaluate when you don't even know which players play for which teams...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #63
just noticed this is another bullshit capper who started off the season losing so badly that he had to make a new alias two months into the season...


grats on winning a game!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 8856
Posted: #64
Congrats on surviving the Covers jinx, SofaKing.  Posts like these usually end up biting people in the ass on here.  You should feel lucky and should play the lotto.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60080
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

vaz, i like you brother, been around for longer than my info says, and i always enjoy your threads, on or off topic...so i wont argue with you here...its meant to stir a little debate, and also meant to stress to take the eagles tonight...confidence belittles confidence...if people catch my confidence, whether it be through arrogant statements as such or words falling off sweet rose petals, its meant to catch the attention....if u see my threads, i have been very confident in about 5 plays in the NFL this season, and have been 4-1 in these, the one loss being the pats earlier today by a half point...my titles are arrogant, my posts within such are arrogant, but its meant to make people money...

GL with your bets this week..

I have no problems with this.   Covers is like the Roman Collisseum.  Sissies get fed to the wolves, so why not be a lion?

Just making a point in case you were serious because there are a lot of people who actually believe the same types of statements.

Anyway, congrats.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #66

Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:




re-evaluate how you cap, huh?


got a prop for you... me and you, 10 games this week... loser doesn't ever post on this forum again... let's see who needs to re-evaluate after i beat you by 6 games on a 10 game card...

bring it on my friend, i will creat a thread for it, or you are welcome to...i only play foots, but you are welcome to play any sport you feel confident with...these threads, like i told vaz, are meant to catch peoples eyes, and stir the pot....i have been on covers for a long time and i know that being a little arrogant sometimes when posting plays reels people into the threads....the mindless banter will slow down once people realize that i am only here to help them win money....thats all...GL with your plays this week, and seriously let me know if you want to do the 10 plays...i wont make you leave when ya lose , more of just a little fun to get me thru another tough work week....i have to work on thanksgiving!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 11059
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

haha, a lot of you haters came out of the woodwork when it started to turn there....where you at now? ill be celebrating by 2.2k, while you re-evaluate how you cap

congrats philly backers......win with class coksucker........

 

1-0-1 tonight..+$2150

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 66757
Posted: #68
Can you teach a smart individual like me to be intelligent?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #69
oh and the manningham thing.....if you were watching intently like i was, al michaels made a comment after manningham caught a pass. Michaels: "and that pass is complete to manningham, who had 10 catches against the giants last week" i thought it was funny that Al is starting to lose it slowly like madden did in his later years, so i decided to post it and see if anyone else caught it, but apparently noone did sorry if it came off like me not knowing what i was talking about
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #70

Quote Originally Posted by KktdocT:

Can you teach a smart individual like me to be intelligent?

i can, but ill be honest things are going to get a little weird....2 dragons

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

haha, a lot of you haters came out of the woodwork when it started to turn there....where you at now? ill be celebrating by 2.2k, while you re-evaluate how you cap

congrats philly backers.

 

1-0-1 tonight..+$2150

 

Were you expecting love letters instead of hate mail with title threads such as the following:  "If you dont bet on the Eagles....", "POY, POD, POD, Play of the milleniu..." & "2nd Half Play of the Millenium"...

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

bring it on my friend, i will creat a thread for it, or you are welcome to...i only play foots, but you are welcome to play any sport you feel confident with...these threads, like i told vaz, are meant to catch peoples eyes, and stir the pot....i have been on covers for a long time and i know that being a little arrogant sometimes when posting plays reels people into the threads....the mindless banter will slow down once people realize that i am only here to help them win money....thats all...GL with your plays this week, and seriously let me know if you want to do the 10 plays...i wont make you leave when ya lose , more of just a little fun to get me thru another tough work week....i have to work on thanksgiving!





okay... if you won't make me leave i won't make you leave... however, this is to make a point:  you have claimed in this thread that anybody who does not take Philly should re-evaluate their capping...

here is what i am claiming:  i took the Giants tonight, and i sure as shit do not need to re-evaluate my capping any more than you do...

according to you, nobody who took the Giants tonight should be able to compete with you... well, let's just see about that!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:





okay... if you won't make me leave i won't make you leave... however, this is to make a point:  you have claimed in this thread that anybody who does not take Philly should re-evaluate their capping...

here is what i am claiming:  i took the Giants tonight, and i sure as shit do not need to re-evaluate my capping any more than you do...

according to you, nobody who took the Giants tonight should be able to compete with you... well, let's just see about that!

more fueling the fire than actually thinking people should reevaluate their capping. i knew that would bring some heat, but thats why i did it, as i tried to convey above. some great cappers ive known and respected for a while here were on the giants, and in no way do i think they need to re-evaluate their capping, nor do i think im a better capper....

and i love a little healthy competition! should be fun...how do you want it to work?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 722
Posted: #74

oddsbuster, can we be friends?

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by -SofaKingCool-:

oddsbuster, can we be friends?

Can I be the 1st to post on page 4 of a thread full of non sense and clutter...
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.