no what i said was that there are teams that dont want to hit when you have extreme cold and the total will go over ,,,,like we did see in the case of the two games i mentioned ......im not saying this happens in all games when you have this type of cold and wind ........i also said i thought that these two teams being on MNF would not play like a bunch of box with alot of arm tackling and no hitting ......i do know that the wind i see in the forcast will affect the passing game and you may have a very vanilla offense from both teams wich could produce a low scoring game .........the bears offense sucks anyway and if greenbay does show up on defense which i think they will ..,and can shut down the run game you will have a game that goes under the total
havent bet yet might scratch teaser and just take the packers with the points ...its 4 or 4.5 will be trying to get the best line ...the packers are capable of a SU win ...plus as i mentiponed in post they have lost many games by 4 or less
![]()
no what i said was that there are teams that dont want to hit when you have extreme cold and the total will go over ,,,,like we did see in the case of the two games i mentioned ......im not saying this happens in all games when you have this type of cold and wind ........i also said i thought that these two teams being on MNF would not play like a bunch of box with alot of arm tackling and no hitting ......i do know that the wind i see in the forcast will affect the passing game and you may have a very vanilla offense from both teams wich could produce a low scoring game .........the bears offense sucks anyway and if greenbay does show up on defense which i think they will ..,and can shut down the run game you will have a game that goes under the total
havent bet yet might scratch teaser and just take the packers with the points ...its 4 or 4.5 will be trying to get the best line ...the packers are capable of a SU win ...plus as i mentiponed in post they have lost many games by 4 or less
![]()
well greenbay seem to shut him down forte the last time they faced him on november 16
16 carrys 64 yds .....hes listed as probable with a bad toe ......and the bears offense does suck ,, stats are just a product of who you played to score the points ....and about a month ago they played the packers and scored 3 points ....if they could only scored 3 in good weather what will happen tonight . when all they will do is run ....they didnt run on greenbay last time did they? Orton was 13 -26 133 yds will he do better tonight in this weather ....i doubt it
well greenbay seem to shut him down forte the last time they faced him on november 16
16 carrys 64 yds .....hes listed as probable with a bad toe ......and the bears offense does suck ,, stats are just a product of who you played to score the points ....and about a month ago they played the packers and scored 3 points ....if they could only scored 3 in good weather what will happen tonight . when all they will do is run ....they didnt run on greenbay last time did they? Orton was 13 -26 133 yds will he do better tonight in this weather ....i doubt it
maybe rich ... but my feeling on the bears is negitive ....in their last game i thought if new orleans started better they would have won the game ..if new orleans won the coin toss in ot i know they would have won .....and this is a team that is spoiled from playing inside a dome.... and when they are out in the elements in bad weather they dont play well ..yet they almost beat the bears ....with greenbay they are a custom to this weather they will face tonight .....and they are hungry for a win ...all these teams get up for MNF they will play hard .....i just think they are better than chicago
anyway gl ![]()
maybe rich ... but my feeling on the bears is negitive ....in their last game i thought if new orleans started better they would have won the game ..if new orleans won the coin toss in ot i know they would have won .....and this is a team that is spoiled from playing inside a dome.... and when they are out in the elements in bad weather they dont play well ..yet they almost beat the bears ....with greenbay they are a custom to this weather they will face tonight .....and they are hungry for a win ...all these teams get up for MNF they will play hard .....i just think they are better than chicago
anyway gl ![]()
The Bears have renewed playoff hopes thanks to the Vikings loss yesterday, giving folks an easy reason to back them tonight laying a small number vs. a 5-9 team. But the fact that they needed that Minnesota loss tells us something, doesn't it? The Bears didn't win enough games to begin with. The Packers have been losing with regularity, and certainly have nothing to play for here. Or do they? This is a heated Black-and-Blue division rivalry. Last year the Packers lost three games and two of those were to the Bears. They now have a chance to take their rival out of the playoff picture, and will be playing loose and free, but also with purpose. The Bears were stopping the run early in the season. But since week 11, when Ryan Grant trampled the Bears for 145 yards, the only team that the Bears stopped on the ground was St. Louis without Steven Jackson! All other teams have run for 100+ yards vs. the Bears. If Grant does what every back has done against the Bears since his big game, then Rodgers is likely to have a big game, as he has thrown for 250 yards in every game since that first Bears game. Chicago needs the game, but that doesn't mean they will get it. Heck, didn't Denver need to win yesterday? What about Philadelphia? What about Minnesota? Dallas? This is essentially the Packers Superbowl game - tonight. They would love nothing more than to put the Bears into hibernation until next year and given that it's a Monday Night primtetime game, I would be surprised at a no-show from the Pack. Kyle Orton has never shown to be a pressure QB, and although the Packers secondary has been picked apart lately, a couple of off-target throws by Orton, and the Bears are gonna be looking up at a scoreboard filled with Green Bay lights. Collins, Williams and Woodson each have five INT's, and the Pack has taken seven errant throws back for scores this season. Green Bay has won just once in their last seven games, but it was a 37-3 domination of the Bears. This looks somewhat like the opposite of last year, when the Packers lost three times with two coming to the Bears. Can the Packers make it just two wins in their last eight games, and both to the Bears? The same Packers defense that was struggling held Orton to 133 yards and Forte to 64 in game one. I believe the Packers to be a better team than their record indicates (simply a very unlucky one this year). I'll back the Packers here to play an inspired game, and the Bears to be tight. I'm taking the points and the Pack here.
good points ![]()
The Bears have renewed playoff hopes thanks to the Vikings loss yesterday, giving folks an easy reason to back them tonight laying a small number vs. a 5-9 team. But the fact that they needed that Minnesota loss tells us something, doesn't it? The Bears didn't win enough games to begin with. The Packers have been losing with regularity, and certainly have nothing to play for here. Or do they? This is a heated Black-and-Blue division rivalry. Last year the Packers lost three games and two of those were to the Bears. They now have a chance to take their rival out of the playoff picture, and will be playing loose and free, but also with purpose. The Bears were stopping the run early in the season. But since week 11, when Ryan Grant trampled the Bears for 145 yards, the only team that the Bears stopped on the ground was St. Louis without Steven Jackson! All other teams have run for 100+ yards vs. the Bears. If Grant does what every back has done against the Bears since his big game, then Rodgers is likely to have a big game, as he has thrown for 250 yards in every game since that first Bears game. Chicago needs the game, but that doesn't mean they will get it. Heck, didn't Denver need to win yesterday? What about Philadelphia? What about Minnesota? Dallas? This is essentially the Packers Superbowl game - tonight. They would love nothing more than to put the Bears into hibernation until next year and given that it's a Monday Night primtetime game, I would be surprised at a no-show from the Pack. Kyle Orton has never shown to be a pressure QB, and although the Packers secondary has been picked apart lately, a couple of off-target throws by Orton, and the Bears are gonna be looking up at a scoreboard filled with Green Bay lights. Collins, Williams and Woodson each have five INT's, and the Pack has taken seven errant throws back for scores this season. Green Bay has won just once in their last seven games, but it was a 37-3 domination of the Bears. This looks somewhat like the opposite of last year, when the Packers lost three times with two coming to the Bears. Can the Packers make it just two wins in their last eight games, and both to the Bears? The same Packers defense that was struggling held Orton to 133 yards and Forte to 64 in game one. I believe the Packers to be a better team than their record indicates (simply a very unlucky one this year). I'll back the Packers here to play an inspired game, and the Bears to be tight. I'm taking the points and the Pack here.
good points ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.