Now I know you're a homer, but, geez dude...you've fallen off your rocker in this thread. You are CLEARLY not being one ounce objective in here...
The Magic will win the next 3 in a row??? You really can't even be serious...I mean I can understand you praying every night that it happens, but, to say with a straight face that they WILL win the next 3? Dude, you are completely nuts. I have some questions for you:
1) How many times has Phil Jackson lost 3 in a row in a playoff series?
2) How many times has Phil Jackson lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after leading the series 2-0?
3) How many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series?
4) How many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after the Lakers led 2-0?
5) How many times in the history of the NBA Finals has a team down 2-0 come back to win 3 in a row (aside from the refs and D-Wade over the Mavs a few years back)?
C'mon Osirus, at least make a little effort to be objective and not be such a homer... Personally, I could definitely see Orlando winning 2 of the next 3, but, that's perfect for the Lakers because then they come back to L.A. only needing to win 1 of 2 at home for the NBA Championship. I think Orlando winning 2 of 3 is easily the most likely scenario of any over these next 3 games...I give Orlando winning all 3 games ZERO chance, I give the Lakers winning 2 of 3 and closing it out in 5 games a slight chance, and I give the Lakers closing it with a sweep very, very little chance as well. Orlando will win 2 of the next 3, definitely the most likely scenario by far.
Now pull your head out of your ass and at least make an attempt at being objective. I look forward to your answers to the 5 questions I've asked above...
Now I know you're a homer, but, geez dude...you've fallen off your rocker in this thread. You are CLEARLY not being one ounce objective in here...
The Magic will win the next 3 in a row??? You really can't even be serious...I mean I can understand you praying every night that it happens, but, to say with a straight face that they WILL win the next 3? Dude, you are completely nuts. I have some questions for you:
1) How many times has Phil Jackson lost 3 in a row in a playoff series?
2) How many times has Phil Jackson lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after leading the series 2-0?
3) How many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series?
4) How many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after the Lakers led 2-0?
5) How many times in the history of the NBA Finals has a team down 2-0 come back to win 3 in a row (aside from the refs and D-Wade over the Mavs a few years back)?
C'mon Osirus, at least make a little effort to be objective and not be such a homer... Personally, I could definitely see Orlando winning 2 of the next 3, but, that's perfect for the Lakers because then they come back to L.A. only needing to win 1 of 2 at home for the NBA Championship. I think Orlando winning 2 of 3 is easily the most likely scenario of any over these next 3 games...I give Orlando winning all 3 games ZERO chance, I give the Lakers winning 2 of 3 and closing it out in 5 games a slight chance, and I give the Lakers closing it with a sweep very, very little chance as well. Orlando will win 2 of the next 3, definitely the most likely scenario by far.
Now pull your head out of your ass and at least make an attempt at being objective. I look forward to your answers to the 5 questions I've asked above...
Your right Rod, the chances of any nba team winning 3 in a row would be like hitting the lottery.
Your right Rod, the chances of any nba team winning 3 in a row would be like hitting the lottery.
You once again could not be more wrong...just because I am a Laker fan and I go by "L8kersFan74", that does NOT mean that I can't be objective. I am very objective where you are obviously not. Just because a person is a fan does not mean that he/she can not be objective about his/her team.
I think by me saying "the Magic winning 2 of the next 3 games is the most likely scenario over this next 3 game stretch", that PROVES my objectivity. If I was a "homer" (like you) I would predict a Lakers sweep. Another question...didn't you also predict the Magic to win Game 1, then picked them again to win Game 2...now you're picking them to win the next 3??? Do you get the point yet? Clearly this is the difference between being a "homer" (you) and being "objective" (me). Honestly, I think your "homerism" is worse than all those Celtics fans.
And as for referring to Kobe...if you had half of a brain you'd realize that obviously Kobe has been the only mainstay with the Lakers over the past dozen years. So, when I say "how many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after leading 2-0" most people can understand that I'm using "Kobe Bryant" instead of "Lakers" because I'm referring to the Lakers during what can be termed as "the Kobe Bryant era", not their entire history with decades of irrelevance directly related to the points I'm making. Make sense yet?
You once again could not be more wrong...just because I am a Laker fan and I go by "L8kersFan74", that does NOT mean that I can't be objective. I am very objective where you are obviously not. Just because a person is a fan does not mean that he/she can not be objective about his/her team.
I think by me saying "the Magic winning 2 of the next 3 games is the most likely scenario over this next 3 game stretch", that PROVES my objectivity. If I was a "homer" (like you) I would predict a Lakers sweep. Another question...didn't you also predict the Magic to win Game 1, then picked them again to win Game 2...now you're picking them to win the next 3??? Do you get the point yet? Clearly this is the difference between being a "homer" (you) and being "objective" (me). Honestly, I think your "homerism" is worse than all those Celtics fans.
And as for referring to Kobe...if you had half of a brain you'd realize that obviously Kobe has been the only mainstay with the Lakers over the past dozen years. So, when I say "how many times has Kobe Bryant lost 3 in a row in a playoff series after leading 2-0" most people can understand that I'm using "Kobe Bryant" instead of "Lakers" because I'm referring to the Lakers during what can be termed as "the Kobe Bryant era", not their entire history with decades of irrelevance directly related to the points I'm making. Make sense yet?
That's pretty funny...I think he's definitely a "homer" and those two can certainly be put in the same league of "homerism", but, the main difference is that Osirus has been around a while and I don't think he'll run and hide when his team loses like Cavs_Lover did...that was totally pathetic!
That's pretty funny...I think he's definitely a "homer" and those two can certainly be put in the same league of "homerism", but, the main difference is that Osirus has been around a while and I don't think he'll run and hide when his team loses like Cavs_Lover did...that was totally pathetic!
The Maguc sure finished... finished the Lakers off yesterday.
The Maguc sure finished... finished the Lakers off yesterday.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.