Boston game was another prime example, the spread is 4.5 and almost 80% on the money is on boston, guess what happen next
There's a tenigue that I use sometimes. Its compare Pinnacle's line with the other casinos. Pinnicle is usually right on the money. Pinnacle open Den-1 and o/u 200 other casinos have Den-1.5 to 2.5 and O/U around 200.5 to 201. Its no 100% but works for me.
Boston game was another prime example, the spread is 4.5 and almost 80% on the money is on boston, guess what happen next
There's a tenigue that I use sometimes. Its compare Pinnacle's line with the other casinos. Pinnicle is usually right on the money. Pinnacle open Den-1 and o/u 200 other casinos have Den-1.5 to 2.5 and O/U around 200.5 to 201. Its no 100% but works for me.
careful with this guy everyone..his angle is no better than most of us..
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=101256312
careful with this guy everyone..his angle is no better than most of us..
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=101256312
Atlanta covered- was most public money on them
If Lakers cover- is most public money on them.
Atlanta covered- was most public money on them
If Lakers cover- is most public money on them.
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
you can go to any good park and play 5 on 5 with some real ballers and the game can come down to the wirw .. or big comeback .. same as den losing tonight .. blowing the game .. affalo was playing bad at the end .. anyway that game is just like one at the park or high school gym >> the main reason is because they are only human .. same as me at your park hittin 3's on ya.. blowing by you ..aaand 1 !
so what am i really saying ? that you could try and say the game was fixed at the park and blame it on your bro or you friend that was on your team .. but come on .. good d , bad bounces , bonehead plays .. lucky 3's lmao .. thats what it was in the den game ... and like others said , tired legs . was another rlm play that the original team favored was good . gl
you can go to any good park and play 5 on 5 with some real ballers and the game can come down to the wirw .. or big comeback .. same as den losing tonight .. blowing the game .. affalo was playing bad at the end .. anyway that game is just like one at the park or high school gym >> the main reason is because they are only human .. same as me at your park hittin 3's on ya.. blowing by you ..aaand 1 !
so what am i really saying ? that you could try and say the game was fixed at the park and blame it on your bro or you friend that was on your team .. but come on .. good d , bad bounces , bonehead plays .. lucky 3's lmao .. thats what it was in the den game ... and like others said , tired legs . was another rlm play that the original team favored was good . gl
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
Its very true, you can't win on a consistance base with my angle, but I just can't bring myself looking into a game and don't have doubts on how this game is going to fuck up. In the future, I will try to point out the games that look fishy to me. My only point that I was making is some games gets fix and some don't, so take it for what its worth. You don't have to believe me.
I've looked at that angle before. Trust me, the books aren't that The numbers are everywhere. One day all major concensus covers, other days none covers and other days it's half and half. In other words, if you expect to base your bets on just that angle, you can get the same results using a dart board.
It's just another way for them to screw with your mind.
Its very true, you can't win on a consistance base with my angle, but I just can't bring myself looking into a game and don't have doubts on how this game is going to fuck up. In the future, I will try to point out the games that look fishy to me. My only point that I was making is some games gets fix and some don't, so take it for what its worth. You don't have to believe me.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.