no i did not lock in at 4 but i usually use the line when i posted the play i only had 1,000 bet at 4 now that roy is not playing i honestly would not rate this play as a game of the year and i am disappointed but i posted the play and i have to stick with it.
no i did not lock in at 4 but i usually use the line when i posted the play i only had 1,000 bet at 4 now that roy is not playing i honestly would not rate this play as a game of the year and i am disappointed but i posted the play and i have to stick with it.
What do you mean you "have to stick with it"? You bet only $1,100 before you found out about Roy's uncertainty, so you didn't proceed with the rest. So it's not a Game of the Year play because of Roy. I think anyone can understand that. You don't have to stick to nuthin'. The GOY didn't happen because Roy was ruled out and didn't play. End of story IMO.
I did it. I took the +2.5. Big. As in "TheBest" big.
Bator, what made you jump so hard on that 2nd half bet? Great job, 
I heard enough people say the same old "With no Brandon Roy the Celtics will win easy" stupidity that I knew I had to be in on this LOCK bet.
I've come to the conclusion that until the end of time, bettors will continue to bet against a team when their star player is suddenly ruled out and they will continue to lose those bets. That will never change.
I heard enough people say the same old "With no Brandon Roy the Celtics will win easy" stupidity that I knew I had to be in on this LOCK bet.
I've come to the conclusion that until the end of time, bettors will continue to bet against a team when their star player is suddenly ruled out and they will continue to lose those bets. That will never change.
This is so classic. Cant believe I didnt come accross my mind this whole time. Anyway..be 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
