First NBA total post this year when the Cavs visit the Jazz.
This is an NBA system play of mine. Those of you familiar with my NBA system plays know they are mostly built from technical angles including math and long term trending.
I do not argue with people about the posts... because they have nothing to do with recent play of the teams, who they might traded away since the last time the teams played each other or how far back the trends go. It is all numerically based, has a long term winning % and are proven.
To be honest... I am not always sure how some of the trends continue to apply...but they just do....maybe it's in the local water? We just go with it and win over the long haul.
Here we go for tonight.. The last 10 times the Cavs have played at Utah, 7 were overs. The last 5 of 6 when the Cavs visited Utah it has gone over... even though one game did go under...Note that it would have gone over if they used tonight's total of 188... in all those games the lowest final score was 193. The average final score over the last 6 meetings in Utah is actually 202.
In the last 11 games between the two clubs, home court tossed out, 10 of the last 11 meetings would have went OVER tonight's total of 188 dating all the way back to 2005.
At the time of this post 69% of the bets on this game were played on the UNDER 188 with no downward total line movement. This is due to public perception of each teams recent form... note both the Cavs and Jazz have each played 3 consecutive unders in the last 3 games on their schedule.
The recent under streaks by both teams have forced the oddsmakers to offer a lower number on this total to balance the action. But in reality, my software (damn good software) has this game at 193.
Play the Cavs & Jazz OVER 188 tonight, no reason not to!
Good Luck!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
First NBA total post this year when the Cavs visit the Jazz.
This is an NBA system play of mine. Those of you familiar with my NBA system plays know they are mostly built from technical angles including math and long term trending.
I do not argue with people about the posts... because they have nothing to do with recent play of the teams, who they might traded away since the last time the teams played each other or how far back the trends go. It is all numerically based, has a long term winning % and are proven.
To be honest... I am not always sure how some of the trends continue to apply...but they just do....maybe it's in the local water? We just go with it and win over the long haul.
Here we go for tonight.. The last 10 times the Cavs have played at Utah, 7 were overs. The last 5 of 6 when the Cavs visited Utah it has gone over... even though one game did go under...Note that it would have gone over if they used tonight's total of 188... in all those games the lowest final score was 193. The average final score over the last 6 meetings in Utah is actually 202.
In the last 11 games between the two clubs, home court tossed out, 10 of the last 11 meetings would have went OVER tonight's total of 188 dating all the way back to 2005.
At the time of this post 69% of the bets on this game were played on the UNDER 188 with no downward total line movement. This is due to public perception of each teams recent form... note both the Cavs and Jazz have each played 3 consecutive unders in the last 3 games on their schedule.
The recent under streaks by both teams have forced the oddsmakers to offer a lower number on this total to balance the action. But in reality, my software (damn good software) has this game at 193.
Play the Cavs & Jazz OVER 188 tonight, no reason not to!
Tough to go on past between these 2 teams when LBJ was in the line up for a fair few of those matchups v the jazz....so too deron williams...almost 2 completely different teams also....but BOL anyway :)
0
Tough to go on past between these 2 teams when LBJ was in the line up for a fair few of those matchups v the jazz....so too deron williams...almost 2 completely different teams also....but BOL anyway :)
i dont know man... seems like %80 percent of the games this year is goes UNDER.... ive been making money on the UNDERs... everytime i play Over ... i end up losing. maybe i play this OVER ... take a shot
0
i dont know man... seems like %80 percent of the games this year is goes UNDER.... ive been making money on the UNDERs... everytime i play Over ... i end up losing. maybe i play this OVER ... take a shot
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
0
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
0
Go the under feel Stanley ?
Quote Originally Posted by NoFumbles:
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NoFumbles:
Nah bro. You DON'T BET after statistics. Cleveland was with LeBron just 2 seasons ago and Utah was with D-Will just 10 months ago. Those facts alone increase the total points. I'm not saying this game won't be over, but the reasoning behind this bet is flat out wrong. BOL though.
It's never about recent..... Recent=big hotel in the desert... Long term numbers in pro sports..., don't fall for recent trends....it's a numb nut philosophy$
0
It's never about recent..... Recent=big hotel in the desert... Long term numbers in pro sports..., don't fall for recent trends....it's a numb nut philosophy$
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.