Trust me Bator I know you thought that prop through to the end and thought of EVERY single scenario...you were not going to lose money taking this prop as long as Dallas won the series. It was an EXCELLANT investment with immense ways to protect your bottom line. But again you had Covers nation thinking you had 4-0 FTW and nothing else
The only reason I mentioned the sweep bet in the first place was to chide LakeShowTime on the first page of this very thread. I could just have easily have remained quiet this entire second round as I did in the last month of the regular season and the first round of the playoffs. Your strange accusations kinda make me wish I had.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
Trust me Bator I know you thought that prop through to the end and thought of EVERY single scenario...you were not going to lose money taking this prop as long as Dallas won the series. It was an EXCELLANT investment with immense ways to protect your bottom line. But again you had Covers nation thinking you had 4-0 FTW and nothing else
The only reason I mentioned the sweep bet in the first place was to chide LakeShowTime on the first page of this very thread. I could just have easily have remained quiet this entire second round as I did in the last month of the regular season and the first round of the playoffs. Your strange accusations kinda make me wish I had.
Smoke_O, you're insinuating that I did something sneaky here and I don't think I did. Explain to me again how you're "calling a spade a spade."
You're being defensive now...why I dont know. You highlighted 4 or 5 different statements in my last post. But the most important paragraph you skipped over. In that paragraph I laid forth what you did. Which in NO MEANS makes you sneaky or anything of the nature. By the contrary it was a shrewd investment that yielded a high return. What I had a problem with is when you grandstand and proclaim 4-0 SWEEP at 50-1 odds in multiple threads (at least in this one as well as the PapaShanga thread) but you didnt say that you had 2 other bets on 4-2 and 4-3. And let me be CLEAR...you Did you have to state these things! But when nave people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not knowing you are protected in other ways. Thats what I meant by calling it a spade of spade.
I only commented on what YOU POSTED! You posted YOUR betting ticket. I didnt ask about your ticket, I simply made an observation and commented on what again....YOU posted. So there was nothing that I insinuating. I had the facts in front of me (posted by you) and I made a comment. much of which was praising the bet.
Now if you want to talk about the paragraph you didn't quote and what you did there and how you saw a flaw made by the oddsmakers in the LA/Dallas series price as well "correct game series" prop bet then lets do it. But if you want to look for sentences in this reply to quote and put cute little emoticons underneath and call me weird and take the defensive again then save it.I'm not looking for back and forth Internet squabbles
I'm grown man looking for ways to catch bad lines and win money...especially in these playoffs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Smoke_O, you're insinuating that I did something sneaky here and I don't think I did. Explain to me again how you're "calling a spade a spade."
You're being defensive now...why I dont know. You highlighted 4 or 5 different statements in my last post. But the most important paragraph you skipped over. In that paragraph I laid forth what you did. Which in NO MEANS makes you sneaky or anything of the nature. By the contrary it was a shrewd investment that yielded a high return. What I had a problem with is when you grandstand and proclaim 4-0 SWEEP at 50-1 odds in multiple threads (at least in this one as well as the PapaShanga thread) but you didnt say that you had 2 other bets on 4-2 and 4-3. And let me be CLEAR...you Did you have to state these things! But when nave people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not knowing you are protected in other ways. Thats what I meant by calling it a spade of spade.
I only commented on what YOU POSTED! You posted YOUR betting ticket. I didnt ask about your ticket, I simply made an observation and commented on what again....YOU posted. So there was nothing that I insinuating. I had the facts in front of me (posted by you) and I made a comment. much of which was praising the bet.
Now if you want to talk about the paragraph you didn't quote and what you did there and how you saw a flaw made by the oddsmakers in the LA/Dallas series price as well "correct game series" prop bet then lets do it. But if you want to look for sentences in this reply to quote and put cute little emoticons underneath and call me weird and take the defensive again then save it.I'm not looking for back and forth Internet squabbles
I'm grown man looking for ways to catch bad lines and win money...especially in these playoffs.
I agree that the Mavericks can be mentally weak at times, but now that they've gained confidence from pulling out Game 1, the sweep......IS.......ON.
4-0
Not only did Dallas sweep the FakeShow...they completely crushed and humiliated them. Great call Bator and I am glad I took the series bet on Dallas before the 1st game. YES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
I agree that the Mavericks can be mentally weak at times, but now that they've gained confidence from pulling out Game 1, the sweep......IS.......ON.
4-0
Not only did Dallas sweep the FakeShow...they completely crushed and humiliated them. Great call Bator and I am glad I took the series bet on Dallas before the 1st game. YES!
* And let me be CLEAR...you Did NOT you have to state these things! But when
naive people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not
knowing you are protected in other ways. *
0
Corrected
* And let me be CLEAR...you Did NOT you have to state these things! But when
naive people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not
knowing you are protected in other ways. *
The only reason I mentioned the sweep bet in the first place was to chide LakeShowTime on the first page of this very thread. I could just have easily have remained quiet this entire second round as I did in the last month of the regular season and the first round of the playoffs. Your strange accusations kinda make me wish I had.
Glad you didn't. Your insight on this series pushed me over the ledge and helped make me(and I'm sure many others on this site) money by betting on the Mavericks for both the series and games. Please don't let creeps like Smoke_O, who make false accusations about your integrity and character, lead to reclusion.
Mavs
Cha-frickin-ching
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
The only reason I mentioned the sweep bet in the first place was to chide LakeShowTime on the first page of this very thread. I could just have easily have remained quiet this entire second round as I did in the last month of the regular season and the first round of the playoffs. Your strange accusations kinda make me wish I had.
Glad you didn't. Your insight on this series pushed me over the ledge and helped make me(and I'm sure many others on this site) money by betting on the Mavericks for both the series and games. Please don't let creeps like Smoke_O, who make false accusations about your integrity and character, lead to reclusion.
Glad you didn't. Your insight on this series pushed me over the ledge and helped make me(and I'm sure many others on this site) money by betting on the Mavericks for both the series and games. Please don't let creeps like Smoke_O, who make false accusations about your integrity and character, lead to reclusion.
Mavs
Cha-frickin-ching
Creeps? Who is a creep and what false accusation did I make? I didnt accuse him of anything. Son you need to let GROWN MEN converse and keep your mouth close and count the little piglets of chump change you made. Let him defend himself or call me names if thats whats needed. Him and I are having a discussion...so fall back and keep my name from being typed on your keyboard again
0
Quote Originally Posted by Consilience:
Glad you didn't. Your insight on this series pushed me over the ledge and helped make me(and I'm sure many others on this site) money by betting on the Mavericks for both the series and games. Please don't let creeps like Smoke_O, who make false accusations about your integrity and character, lead to reclusion.
Mavs
Cha-frickin-ching
Creeps? Who is a creep and what false accusation did I make? I didnt accuse him of anything. Son you need to let GROWN MEN converse and keep your mouth close and count the little piglets of chump change you made. Let him defend himself or call me names if thats whats needed. Him and I are having a discussion...so fall back and keep my name from being typed on your keyboard again
Creeps? Who is a creep and what false accusation did I make? I didnt accuse him of anything. Son you need to let GROWN MEN converse and keep your mouth close and count the little piglets of chump change you made. Let him defend himself or call me names if thats whats needed. Him and I are having a discussion...so fall back and keep my name from being typed on your keyboard again
Yes, I used the word creeps because your words conjure images of a creepy, dense, stalker. An image in which I'm not a fan. And to call out MrBator on some unwarranted allegations is useless.Congratulate him on a great play and let it go. He's proven to be sincere and honest over time and your accusations are goofy. He called the sweep in the series, who else do you know that can say the same? This site benefits from posters like him, not naysayers like you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
Creeps? Who is a creep and what false accusation did I make? I didnt accuse him of anything. Son you need to let GROWN MEN converse and keep your mouth close and count the little piglets of chump change you made. Let him defend himself or call me names if thats whats needed. Him and I are having a discussion...so fall back and keep my name from being typed on your keyboard again
Yes, I used the word creeps because your words conjure images of a creepy, dense, stalker. An image in which I'm not a fan. And to call out MrBator on some unwarranted allegations is useless.Congratulate him on a great play and let it go. He's proven to be sincere and honest over time and your accusations are goofy. He called the sweep in the series, who else do you know that can say the same? This site benefits from posters like him, not naysayers like you.
Yes, I used the word creeps because your words conjure images of a creepy, dense, stalker. An image in which I'm not a fan. And to call out MrBator on some unwarranted allegations is useless.Congratulate him on a great play and let it go. He's proven to be sincere and honest over time and your accusations are goofy. He called the sweep in the series, who else do you know that can say the same? This site benefits from posters like him, not naysayers like you.
Reading is fundamental...if you read what I ACTUALLY WROTE you would not be some ignorant on the matter. My concerns and thoughts were precisely stated. Bator wanted to make side remarks and detract from the arguments which was fine with me. I called it a spade of spade and went about my business. Then it was HIM who continued to quote bits of what I said all awhile bumping the thread up to the top. By doing this the casual Covers member and Bator apologist only see his side and reads his defensive remarks to an innocent but insightful statement from me. He never acknowledges my 2nd paragrapgh which leave someone like YOU to not KNOW what is going on.
Again the internet is a great tool...it might be the greatest invention of mankind. All you have to do is go to the bottom of page 2 and read my paragraph in the middle (The one Bator HAS NEVER addressed). In it you will read some very glowing and I would think praiseful remarks aimed at MrBator and a review of how he found a loophole in a very weak line.
But again Bator does not want that type of attention he wants to be seen as the "victim" and draw attention to pretty much nothing. He is quick to highlight sentences and put them in 40 font bold and jump in and out of OTHER people's theads but Ive waited 5 hours for a response and I am yet to hear one from him. Yet I have to protect my neck from the blind sheep such as yourself
0
Quote Originally Posted by Consilience:
Yes, I used the word creeps because your words conjure images of a creepy, dense, stalker. An image in which I'm not a fan. And to call out MrBator on some unwarranted allegations is useless.Congratulate him on a great play and let it go. He's proven to be sincere and honest over time and your accusations are goofy. He called the sweep in the series, who else do you know that can say the same? This site benefits from posters like him, not naysayers like you.
Reading is fundamental...if you read what I ACTUALLY WROTE you would not be some ignorant on the matter. My concerns and thoughts were precisely stated. Bator wanted to make side remarks and detract from the arguments which was fine with me. I called it a spade of spade and went about my business. Then it was HIM who continued to quote bits of what I said all awhile bumping the thread up to the top. By doing this the casual Covers member and Bator apologist only see his side and reads his defensive remarks to an innocent but insightful statement from me. He never acknowledges my 2nd paragrapgh which leave someone like YOU to not KNOW what is going on.
Again the internet is a great tool...it might be the greatest invention of mankind. All you have to do is go to the bottom of page 2 and read my paragraph in the middle (The one Bator HAS NEVER addressed). In it you will read some very glowing and I would think praiseful remarks aimed at MrBator and a review of how he found a loophole in a very weak line.
But again Bator does not want that type of attention he wants to be seen as the "victim" and draw attention to pretty much nothing. He is quick to highlight sentences and put them in 40 font bold and jump in and out of OTHER people's theads but Ive waited 5 hours for a response and I am yet to hear one from him. Yet I have to protect my neck from the blind sheep such as yourself
You're being defensive now...why I dont know. You highlighted 4 or 5 different statements in my last post. But the most important paragraph you skipped over. In that paragraph I laid forth what you did. Which in NO MEANS makes you sneaky or anything of the nature. By the contrary it was a shrewd investment that yielded a high return. What I had a problem with is when you grandstand and proclaim 4-0 SWEEP at 50-1 odds in multiple threads (at least in this one as well as the PapaShanga thread) but you didnt say that you had 2 other bets on 4-2 and 4-3. And let me be CLEAR...you Did you have to state these things! But when nave people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not knowing you are protected in other ways. Thats what I meant by calling it a spade of spade.
I only commented on what YOU POSTED! You posted YOUR betting ticket. I didnt ask about your ticket, I simply made an observation and commented on what again....YOU posted. So there was nothing that I insinuating. I had the facts in front of me (posted by you) and I made a comment. much of which was praising the bet.
Now if you want to talk about the paragraph you didn't quote and what you did there and how you saw a flaw made by the oddsmakers in the LA/Dallas series price as well "correct game series" prop bet then lets do it. But if you want to look for sentences in this reply to quote and put cute little emoticons underneath and call me weird and take the defensive again then save it.I'm not looking for back and forth Internet squabbles
I'm grown man looking for ways to catch bad lines and win money...especially in these playoffs.
he doesn't have to post anything on what he is playing- he just said he was playing 4-0 which obviously means he liked the Mavs in almost all of the games just be glad he is posting as I truly missed his posts during that month or so where he didn't post anything- if people want to tail his play that's their choice he is by no means responsible to take action for what other people choose to do- you could call him out if he said Mavs sweep and maybe then had some Laker-pro picks to deceive people but he didn't nonetheless your arguement is completely irrational
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
You're being defensive now...why I dont know. You highlighted 4 or 5 different statements in my last post. But the most important paragraph you skipped over. In that paragraph I laid forth what you did. Which in NO MEANS makes you sneaky or anything of the nature. By the contrary it was a shrewd investment that yielded a high return. What I had a problem with is when you grandstand and proclaim 4-0 SWEEP at 50-1 odds in multiple threads (at least in this one as well as the PapaShanga thread) but you didnt say that you had 2 other bets on 4-2 and 4-3. And let me be CLEAR...you Did you have to state these things! But when nave people see this (ie. Covers nation) they go all in on this not knowing you are protected in other ways. Thats what I meant by calling it a spade of spade.
I only commented on what YOU POSTED! You posted YOUR betting ticket. I didnt ask about your ticket, I simply made an observation and commented on what again....YOU posted. So there was nothing that I insinuating. I had the facts in front of me (posted by you) and I made a comment. much of which was praising the bet.
Now if you want to talk about the paragraph you didn't quote and what you did there and how you saw a flaw made by the oddsmakers in the LA/Dallas series price as well "correct game series" prop bet then lets do it. But if you want to look for sentences in this reply to quote and put cute little emoticons underneath and call me weird and take the defensive again then save it.I'm not looking for back and forth Internet squabbles
I'm grown man looking for ways to catch bad lines and win money...especially in these playoffs.
he doesn't have to post anything on what he is playing- he just said he was playing 4-0 which obviously means he liked the Mavs in almost all of the games just be glad he is posting as I truly missed his posts during that month or so where he didn't post anything- if people want to tail his play that's their choice he is by no means responsible to take action for what other people choose to do- you could call him out if he said Mavs sweep and maybe then had some Laker-pro picks to deceive people but he didn't nonetheless your arguement is completely irrational
he doesn't have to post anything on what he is playing- he just said he was playing 4-0 which obviously means he liked the Mavs in almost all of the games just be glad he is posting as I truly missed his posts during that month or so where he didn't post anything- if people want to tail his play that's their choice he is by no means responsible to take action for what other people choose to do- you could call him out if he said Mavs sweep and maybe then had some Laker-pro picks to deceive people but he didn't nonetheless your arguement is completely irrational
From now I will not even bother speaking...because everything thats needed to be said has been said already. For you Mtaker read post #55 ...good day to you
0
Quote Originally Posted by mtbaker:
he doesn't have to post anything on what he is playing- he just said he was playing 4-0 which obviously means he liked the Mavs in almost all of the games just be glad he is posting as I truly missed his posts during that month or so where he didn't post anything- if people want to tail his play that's their choice he is by no means responsible to take action for what other people choose to do- you could call him out if he said Mavs sweep and maybe then had some Laker-pro picks to deceive people but he didn't nonetheless your arguement is completely irrational
From now I will not even bother speaking...because everything thats needed to be said has been said already. For you Mtaker read post #55 ...good day to you
From now I will not even bother speaking...because everything thats needed to be said has been said already. For you Mtaker read post #55 ...good day to you
On behalf of every member of this site, thank you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
From now I will not even bother speaking...because everything thats needed to be said has been said already. For you Mtaker read post #55 ...good day to you
On behalf of every member of this site, thank you.
On behalf of every member of this site, thank you.
No I stand by what I wrote.But I meant I am done repeating myself when everything is already stated on page 2 and even clarified on page 3. I will only use post # and line sequence for anymore lame accusations and mis-information. But Im definitely doen adressing you, because quite frankly you're a nobody...really who are you? and why am I responding to you? Now run along my friend and troll elsewhere.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Consilience:
On behalf of every member of this site, thank you.
No I stand by what I wrote.But I meant I am done repeating myself when everything is already stated on page 2 and even clarified on page 3. I will only use post # and line sequence for anymore lame accusations and mis-information. But Im definitely doen adressing you, because quite frankly you're a nobody...really who are you? and why am I responding to you? Now run along my friend and troll elsewhere.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Mavs
Hot Forum Topics
