if you are unsure, log on to your book and go to the rules section, mine and most state that if a game is called then it goes back to the last full inning of play, in our case it is the 5th inning and cards ml will win and I will win......please call the game already
0
if you are unsure, log on to your book and go to the rules section, mine and most state that if a game is called then it goes back to the last full inning of play, in our case it is the 5th inning and cards ml will win and I will win......please call the game already
haha, you really need to learn English. The rules are clear as day, if the game is played tomorrow. THE MATCH IS PLAYED ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED THUS CANCELING THE BET.
Reading is grade one stuff.
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you?
Trust me, you are wrong. I played the exact same situation two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game when the Cubs were in this exact same scenario and the Pirates were graded the winner for betting purposes. In today's scenario, the Cubs are the Red and the Pirates are the Cardinals.
Matchbook states: For games suspended and rescheduled to a later date, moneyline markets
are graded based on the score at the end of the last full inning,
should play be halted in the top half of the inning with the home team
trailing.
It couldn't be any clearer. MB is stating that if the game is suspended, the moneyline will be graded on the score at the end of the last full inning, meaning here the Cards win 2-1. What is it you don't understand?
Your counter argument is about a rule that does not apply here. You are quoting, "If a match is played on a different date or at a different venue than
originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded."
The fact is the match was played today and will just finish on a different date. This rule applies to games that are postponed or played in a different location than scheduled. If the game hadn't started today and was played tomorrow as part of a doubleheader, this rule would apply and the bet would be refunded. This rules does not apply to suspended games that were played on the correct date at the correct venue!
With regard to suspended games, the first rule I wrote above is the one that applies. If your theory was correct, the first rule written above would never come into play and would always be trumped by the 2nd rule above. This is clearly not the case.
Just humble yourself and admit you weren't aware of the rule and that you are wrong.
You are making yourself look like a jackass!
0
Quote Originally Posted by C2Knuckles:
haha, you really need to learn English. The rules are clear as day, if the game is played tomorrow. THE MATCH IS PLAYED ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED THUS CANCELING THE BET.
Reading is grade one stuff.
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you?
Trust me, you are wrong. I played the exact same situation two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game when the Cubs were in this exact same scenario and the Pirates were graded the winner for betting purposes. In today's scenario, the Cubs are the Red and the Pirates are the Cardinals.
Matchbook states: For games suspended and rescheduled to a later date, moneyline markets
are graded based on the score at the end of the last full inning,
should play be halted in the top half of the inning with the home team
trailing.
It couldn't be any clearer. MB is stating that if the game is suspended, the moneyline will be graded on the score at the end of the last full inning, meaning here the Cards win 2-1. What is it you don't understand?
Your counter argument is about a rule that does not apply here. You are quoting, "If a match is played on a different date or at a different venue than
originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded."
The fact is the match was played today and will just finish on a different date. This rule applies to games that are postponed or played in a different location than scheduled. If the game hadn't started today and was played tomorrow as part of a doubleheader, this rule would apply and the bet would be refunded. This rules does not apply to suspended games that were played on the correct date at the correct venue!
With regard to suspended games, the first rule I wrote above is the one that applies. If your theory was correct, the first rule written above would never come into play and would always be trumped by the 2nd rule above. This is clearly not the case.
Just humble yourself and admit you weren't aware of the rule and that you are wrong.
You can ASSUME that all you want but it doesn't SAY THAT. It says:
If a match is PLAYED on a different date or at a different venue than originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded.
PLAYED not STARTED. The match is being PLAYED tomorrow, not the originally date (today), thus canceling the bet.
You guys really need to learn how to read.
dude i spoke to matchbook....u lose , game over see my reply.......it would not be cancelled....and the rule u are pointing out is for games that havent started...
I PRAY FOR ANY CHILDREN U HAVE OR MAY HAVE AND I ALSO PRAY FOR THE BEST PART OF YOU WHICH OBVIOUSLY DRIPPED DOWN YOUR MOTHERS LEG AND LEFT A STAIN ON THE SHEET DURING CONCEPTION
0
Quote Originally Posted by C2Knuckles:
You can ASSUME that all you want but it doesn't SAY THAT. It says:
If a match is PLAYED on a different date or at a different venue than originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded.
PLAYED not STARTED. The match is being PLAYED tomorrow, not the originally date (today), thus canceling the bet.
You guys really need to learn how to read.
dude i spoke to matchbook....u lose , game over see my reply.......it would not be cancelled....and the rule u are pointing out is for games that havent started...
I PRAY FOR ANY CHILDREN U HAVE OR MAY HAVE AND I ALSO PRAY FOR THE BEST PART OF YOU WHICH OBVIOUSLY DRIPPED DOWN YOUR MOTHERS LEG AND LEFT A STAIN ON THE SHEET DURING CONCEPTION
Trust me, you are wrong. I played the exact same situation two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game when the Cubs were in this exact same scenario and the Pirates were graded the winner for betting purposes. In today's scenario, the Cubs are the Red and the Pirates are the Cardinals.
Matchbook states: For games suspended and rescheduled to a later date, moneyline markets
are graded based on the score at the end of the last full inning,
should play be halted in the top half of the inning with the home team
trailing.
It couldn't be any clearer. MB is stating that if the game is suspended, the moneyline will be graded on the score at the end of the last full inning, meaning here the Cards win 2-1. What is it you don't understand?
Your counter argument is about a rule that does not apply here. You are quoting, "If a match is played on a different date or at a different venue than
originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded."
The fact is the match was played today and will just finish on a different date. This rule applies to games that are postponed or played in a different location than scheduled. If the game hadn't started today and was played tomorrow as part of a doubleheader, this rule would apply and the bet would be refunded. This rules does not apply to suspended games that were played on the correct date at the correct venue!
With regard to suspended games, the first rule I wrote above is the one that applies. If your theory was correct, the first rule written above would never come into play and would always be trumped by the 2nd rule above. This is clearly not the case.
Just humble yourself and admit you weren't aware of the rule and that you are wrong.
You are making yourself look like a jackass!
All well and nice what you said, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY THAT IN THE RULES, you just threw that in there and made assumptions. They need to make it more detailed if that's the intention of the rule(s).
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you?
Trust me, you are wrong. I played the exact same situation two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game when the Cubs were in this exact same scenario and the Pirates were graded the winner for betting purposes. In today's scenario, the Cubs are the Red and the Pirates are the Cardinals.
Matchbook states: For games suspended and rescheduled to a later date, moneyline markets
are graded based on the score at the end of the last full inning,
should play be halted in the top half of the inning with the home team
trailing.
It couldn't be any clearer. MB is stating that if the game is suspended, the moneyline will be graded on the score at the end of the last full inning, meaning here the Cards win 2-1. What is it you don't understand?
Your counter argument is about a rule that does not apply here. You are quoting, "If a match is played on a different date or at a different venue than
originally scheduled, all wagers will be cancelled and refunded."
The fact is the match was played today and will just finish on a different date. This rule applies to games that are postponed or played in a different location than scheduled. If the game hadn't started today and was played tomorrow as part of a doubleheader, this rule would apply and the bet would be refunded. This rules does not apply to suspended games that were played on the correct date at the correct venue!
With regard to suspended games, the first rule I wrote above is the one that applies. If your theory was correct, the first rule written above would never come into play and would always be trumped by the 2nd rule above. This is clearly not the case.
Just humble yourself and admit you weren't aware of the rule and that you are wrong.
You are making yourself look like a jackass!
All well and nice what you said, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY THAT IN THE RULES, you just threw that in there and made assumptions. They need to make it more detailed if that's the intention of the rule(s).
All well and nice what you said, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY THAT IN THE RULES, you just threw that in there and made assumptions. They need to make it more detailed if that's the intention of the rule(s).
What r u talking about?
These is cut and pasted from MB:
0
Quote Originally Posted by C2Knuckles:
All well and nice what you said, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY THAT IN THE RULES, you just threw that in there and made assumptions. They need to make it more detailed if that's the intention of the rule(s).
The 3rd rule would make no sense and would never apply if you were right that a suspended game would be covered by the first rule. That is not the case. Trust me. This exact scenario happened two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game and the game reverted back to the last completed inning.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
What r u talking about?
These is cut and pasted from MB:
The 3rd rule would make no sense and would never apply if you were right that a suspended game would be covered by the first rule. That is not the case. Trust me. This exact scenario happened two years ago in the Cubs-Pirates game and the game reverted back to the last completed inning.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
