There is not enough home field advantage in the world to put Parker in a class with Shields and there is no offensive advantage either. Per my ratings the Royals are sailing along at 37.2 with a 5.5 oera versus righties and the A’s roll in at 31.3, 4.1. God bless the wagering public for supporting the A’s at home in spite of all the evidence. Oakland is third in a division with only one winning team in it and Kansas City is third in a division with three winning teams. That alone should send a message or at least set off an alarm bell. Overall KC is 16-10 versus righty and Oakland limps in at 14-15. The numbers don’t add up folks.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
There is not enough home field advantage in the world to put Parker in a class with Shields and there is no offensive advantage either. Per my ratings the Royals are sailing along at 37.2 with a 5.5 oera versus righties and the A’s roll in at 31.3, 4.1. God bless the wagering public for supporting the A’s at home in spite of all the evidence. Oakland is third in a division with only one winning team in it and Kansas City is third in a division with three winning teams. That alone should send a message or at least set off an alarm bell. Overall KC is 16-10 versus righty and Oakland limps in at 14-15. The numbers don’t add up folks.
Key!! I have a post that id like for you to reply to (your order/method of capping bb). if you'd like to pm me with it, that's cool to..good luck, i like the plays.
0
Key!! I have a post that id like for you to reply to (your order/method of capping bb). if you'd like to pm me with it, that's cool to..good luck, i like the plays.
Gl Key...what are your thoughts on Harvey today? I see Mets rolling and at that price how is this not a must play?
I might be the only guy on this site that is not really crazy about that play, but I have my doubts. The Mets offense lately does not impress me and Jackson has looked a little better. I compute it right on the risk-reward-probability line and will take a pass, but BOL if you play it.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Frank the Bank:
Gl Key...what are your thoughts on Harvey today? I see Mets rolling and at that price how is this not a must play?
I might be the only guy on this site that is not really crazy about that play, but I have my doubts. The Mets offense lately does not impress me and Jackson has looked a little better. I compute it right on the risk-reward-probability line and will take a pass, but BOL if you play it.
Your out of your mind if you think the betting public is backing the A's in this one , people see shields as better then parker Therefore more people are backing the royals
0
Your out of your mind if you think the betting public is backing the A's in this one , people see shields as better then parker Therefore more people are backing the royals
Your out of your mind if you think the betting public is backing the A's in this one , people see shields as better then parker Therefore more people are backing the royals
Yeah, cause people love to bet on the Kansas City Royals.....been a cash cow for years....
0
Quote Originally Posted by ShootDaClubUp:
Your out of your mind if you think the betting public is backing the A's in this one , people see shields as better then parker Therefore more people are backing the royals
Yeah, cause people love to bet on the Kansas City Royals.....been a cash cow for years....
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
0
76% on royals ML. 84% on Royals RL
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
Key!! I have a post that id like for you to reply to (your order/method of capping bb). if you'd like to pm me with it, that's cool to..good luck, i like the plays.
Sent you a PM
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by JicJac:
Key!! I have a post that id like for you to reply to (your order/method of capping bb). if you'd like to pm me with it, that's cool to..good luck, i like the plays.
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
Athletics, First 5, 5-7-3 last 15 versus righty. 1-4 last 5 and Maurer is the only one they beat. As a fan you are right to be concerned.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:
76% on royals ML. 84% on Royals RL
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
Athletics, First 5, 5-7-3 last 15 versus righty. 1-4 last 5 and Maurer is the only one they beat. As a fan you are right to be concerned.
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
People willing to back the KC name brand alone is disturbing if you like Oakland. Backing them on the road is also a bad sign. Backing them as a road favorite should make you pump your breaks and jump out of the vehicle....
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:
76% on royals ML. 84% on Royals RL
Line opens at -125-135 depending on your book. Line is now at -115 raises some red flags for me.
But on the capping side of things Royals at -115 with shields pitching is a must play here IMO. I have no idea which Parker shows up but my bigger concern is if our offense will show any life against Shields. In our last 10 games we are averaging 2.8 runs per game and this is not the spot where the bats suddenly come to life
People willing to back the KC name brand alone is disturbing if you like Oakland. Backing them on the road is also a bad sign. Backing them as a road favorite should make you pump your breaks and jump out of the vehicle....
People willing to back the KC name brand alone is disturbing if you like Oakland. Backing them on the road is also a bad sign. Backing them as a road favorite should make you pump your breaks and jump out of the vehicle....
Consider something. KC is 10-9 on the road, so if they had been favored every game they would be 10-9 as a road favorite. Oakland 10-10 at home would seem to indicate they SHOULD be a home dog. 500 teams lose money as favorites. Just a little different perspective.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
People willing to back the KC name brand alone is disturbing if you like Oakland. Backing them on the road is also a bad sign. Backing them as a road favorite should make you pump your breaks and jump out of the vehicle....
Consider something. KC is 10-9 on the road, so if they had been favored every game they would be 10-9 as a road favorite. Oakland 10-10 at home would seem to indicate they SHOULD be a home dog. 500 teams lose money as favorites. Just a little different perspective.
Consider something. KC is 10-9 on the road, so if they had been favored every game they would be 10-9 as a road favorite. Oakland 10-10 at home would seem to indicate they SHOULD be a home dog. 500 teams lose money as favorites. Just a little different perspective.
SHOULD be to a lot of teams (KC included), but backing the Royals is something a lot of people turn their nose up at, especially when you gotta lay juice....
KE
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Consider something. KC is 10-9 on the road, so if they had been favored every game they would be 10-9 as a road favorite. Oakland 10-10 at home would seem to indicate they SHOULD be a home dog. 500 teams lose money as favorites. Just a little different perspective.
SHOULD be to a lot of teams (KC included), but backing the Royals is something a lot of people turn their nose up at, especially when you gotta lay juice....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Therefore more people are backing the royals
Hot Forum Topics
