Sorry bro, don't like this side at all. Neither team is hitting the ball well. Reds are 23rd in the league scoring runs on the road (and hitting only .250), 21st hitting righty's (hitting .264).
However the D'Backs aren't any better hitting 29th in the majors vs righty's (dismal .237), and again 29th in scoring at home (hitting only .249) but they have started hitting as of late.
Garland's stuff has been pretty pedestrian for sure but he has found a way to pitch deep into games, and has found a way to win. Arroyo on the other hand was awful in his last start, and historically has been much worse on the road. I will trust Garland at home, over Arroyo on the road in this spot, but it's not the biggest factor in my decision.
I believe the biggest factor here will be travel. Cincy played an extra innings game, which they lost in a heart-breaker, then had to travel two time zones, to play a D'Backs squad that started their homestand with a series loss to the lowly Nats. The bats awoke today putting up a 10 spot, garnering a much needed W.
I honestly see a D'Backs win in this spot, with travel as a key component. One team lost an extra innings game, got on the bus, went to the airport, flew across the country, to play a team coming off a much needed win at home. I suspect the D'Backs players went out after today's game, had a nice home cooked dinner, and had plenty of time to rest and relax. One team will be much more excited to get to the ballpark tomorrow, and the other is well...The Reds
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
Take a hard look at the Giants tomorrow as well. Did I really just say to back the Giants as a favourite? This is more of a fade of the Nats, more so a fade of Daniel Cabrera, then anything else. Randy throws well at home. SF is 10-4 at home, while the Nats are a sparkling 5-12 on the road. This is not too big a price in this spot, and if I had anymore faith in the Giants bats, I'd take a shot with the RL as well for the value. Simply put Cabrera is bad...real bad.
Good luck with MOST of your Monday plays
Let me know your feelings on the Mets/Braves ump, as this one has 2-1, 3-2 written all over it. Just wondered if the ump has any serious trends in this one. Thanks for all your hard work AJ. Hope my insight helps
Great breakdown Mad. This is why I come to Covers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Madd_Capper:
Sorry bro, don't like this side at all. Neither team is hitting the ball well. Reds are 23rd in the league scoring runs on the road (and hitting only .250), 21st hitting righty's (hitting .264).
However the D'Backs aren't any better hitting 29th in the majors vs righty's (dismal .237), and again 29th in scoring at home (hitting only .249) but they have started hitting as of late.
Garland's stuff has been pretty pedestrian for sure but he has found a way to pitch deep into games, and has found a way to win. Arroyo on the other hand was awful in his last start, and historically has been much worse on the road. I will trust Garland at home, over Arroyo on the road in this spot, but it's not the biggest factor in my decision.
I believe the biggest factor here will be travel. Cincy played an extra innings game, which they lost in a heart-breaker, then had to travel two time zones, to play a D'Backs squad that started their homestand with a series loss to the lowly Nats. The bats awoke today putting up a 10 spot, garnering a much needed W.
I honestly see a D'Backs win in this spot, with travel as a key component. One team lost an extra innings game, got on the bus, went to the airport, flew across the country, to play a team coming off a much needed win at home. I suspect the D'Backs players went out after today's game, had a nice home cooked dinner, and had plenty of time to rest and relax. One team will be much more excited to get to the ballpark tomorrow, and the other is well...The Reds
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
Take a hard look at the Giants tomorrow as well. Did I really just say to back the Giants as a favourite? This is more of a fade of the Nats, more so a fade of Daniel Cabrera, then anything else. Randy throws well at home. SF is 10-4 at home, while the Nats are a sparkling 5-12 on the road. This is not too big a price in this spot, and if I had anymore faith in the Giants bats, I'd take a shot with the RL as well for the value. Simply put Cabrera is bad...real bad.
Good luck with MOST of your Monday plays
Let me know your feelings on the Mets/Braves ump, as this one has 2-1, 3-2 written all over it. Just wondered if the ump has any serious trends in this one. Thanks for all your hard work AJ. Hope my insight helps
Great breakdown Mad. This is why I come to Covers.
I have been keeping track of your first plays that you put out the night before since the season started using your RL's as ML's for the teams just to win the game and not counting TT's cause I can not play them? Your record is 20W - 12L on the Teams and 16W - 9L on Over/Unders for a grand total of 36W - 21L You have had 1 week with a losing record that you went 6W - 8L in week 3! GREAT JOB
EDBD
Well I dont put out any TT's the night before because they arent offered. Thanks for the stats, maybe I should just stick to my initial plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by edbd:
AJ,
I have been keeping track of your first plays that you put out the night before since the season started using your RL's as ML's for the teams just to win the game and not counting TT's cause I can not play them? Your record is 20W - 12L on the Teams and 16W - 9L on Over/Unders for a grand total of 36W - 21L You have had 1 week with a losing record that you went 6W - 8L in week 3! GREAT JOB
EDBD
Well I dont put out any TT's the night before because they arent offered. Thanks for the stats, maybe I should just stick to my initial plays.
Like the play...got a question, man. What do you think about the Sox @CLE? Floyd vs. Pavano. I capped the game as a toss-up (50/50), but would like to hear your thoughts, especially since the Sox are your team, so you probably have factors that I haven't used.
Two shitty pitchers...two very shitty teams. I would lean cleveland but wont pay that price. This just seems like one of those games to not even worry about a side. Even though these teams havent hit anybody lately, the over looks good initially.... but lets see what who the ump is.
0
Quote Originally Posted by andy88c:
Like the play...got a question, man. What do you think about the Sox @CLE? Floyd vs. Pavano. I capped the game as a toss-up (50/50), but would like to hear your thoughts, especially since the Sox are your team, so you probably have factors that I haven't used.
Two shitty pitchers...two very shitty teams. I would lean cleveland but wont pay that price. This just seems like one of those games to not even worry about a side. Even though these teams havent hit anybody lately, the over looks good initially.... but lets see what who the ump is.
Sorry bro, don't like this side at all. Neither team is hitting the ball well. Reds are 23rd in the league scoring runs on the road (and hitting only .250), 21st hitting righty's (hitting .264).
However the D'Backs aren't any better hitting 29th in the majors vs righty's (dismal .237), and again 29th in scoring at home (hitting only .249) but they have started hitting as of late.
Garland's stuff has been pretty pedestrian for sure but he has found a way to pitch deep into games, and has found a way to win. Arroyo on the other hand was awful in his last start, and historically has been much worse on the road. I will trust Garland at home, over Arroyo on the road in this spot, but it's not the biggest factor in my decision.
I believe the biggest factor here will be travel. Cincy played an extra innings game, which they lost in a heart-breaker, then had to travel two time zones, to play a D'Backs squad that started their homestand with a series loss to the lowly Nats. The bats awoke today putting up a 10 spot, garnering a much needed W.
I honestly see a D'Backs win in this spot, with travel as a key component. One team lost an extra innings game, got on the bus, went to the airport, flew across the country, to play a team coming off a much needed win at home. I suspect the D'Backs players went out after today's game, had a nice home cooked dinner, and had plenty of time to rest and relax. One team will be much more excited to get to the ballpark tomorrow, and the other is well...The Reds
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
Take a hard look at the Giants tomorrow as well. Did I really just say to back the Giants as a favourite? This is more of a fade of the Nats, more so a fade of Daniel Cabrera, then anything else. Randy throws well at home. SF is 10-4 at home, while the Nats are a sparkling 5-12 on the road. This is not too big a price in this spot, and if I had anymore faith in the Giants bats, I'd take a shot with the RL as well for the value. Simply put Cabrera is bad...real bad.
Good luck with MOST of your Monday plays
Let me know your feelings on the Mets/Braves ump, as this one has 2-1, 3-2 written all over it. Just wondered if the ump has any serious trends in this one. Thanks for all your hard work AJ. Hope my insight helps
I will never consider the travel factor again. I did it twice this year and lost both times. I dont remember the 2nd game but the 1st one was when SD flew across the entire country and went into the new mets stadium and beat them in their home opener as a +200 dog with fucking walter silva on the mound. It took a 4 run 5th inning for the mets to even make a game out of it and they still lost.
I want the Giants but there's no way I'm laying over -140 on this game.
Umps wont be released until later.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Madd_Capper:
Sorry bro, don't like this side at all. Neither team is hitting the ball well. Reds are 23rd in the league scoring runs on the road (and hitting only .250), 21st hitting righty's (hitting .264).
However the D'Backs aren't any better hitting 29th in the majors vs righty's (dismal .237), and again 29th in scoring at home (hitting only .249) but they have started hitting as of late.
Garland's stuff has been pretty pedestrian for sure but he has found a way to pitch deep into games, and has found a way to win. Arroyo on the other hand was awful in his last start, and historically has been much worse on the road. I will trust Garland at home, over Arroyo on the road in this spot, but it's not the biggest factor in my decision.
I believe the biggest factor here will be travel. Cincy played an extra innings game, which they lost in a heart-breaker, then had to travel two time zones, to play a D'Backs squad that started their homestand with a series loss to the lowly Nats. The bats awoke today putting up a 10 spot, garnering a much needed W.
I honestly see a D'Backs win in this spot, with travel as a key component. One team lost an extra innings game, got on the bus, went to the airport, flew across the country, to play a team coming off a much needed win at home. I suspect the D'Backs players went out after today's game, had a nice home cooked dinner, and had plenty of time to rest and relax. One team will be much more excited to get to the ballpark tomorrow, and the other is well...The Reds
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
Take a hard look at the Giants tomorrow as well. Did I really just say to back the Giants as a favourite? This is more of a fade of the Nats, more so a fade of Daniel Cabrera, then anything else. Randy throws well at home. SF is 10-4 at home, while the Nats are a sparkling 5-12 on the road. This is not too big a price in this spot, and if I had anymore faith in the Giants bats, I'd take a shot with the RL as well for the value. Simply put Cabrera is bad...real bad.
Good luck with MOST of your Monday plays
Let me know your feelings on the Mets/Braves ump, as this one has 2-1, 3-2 written all over it. Just wondered if the ump has any serious trends in this one. Thanks for all your hard work AJ. Hope my insight helps
I will never consider the travel factor again. I did it twice this year and lost both times. I dont remember the 2nd game but the 1st one was when SD flew across the entire country and went into the new mets stadium and beat them in their home opener as a +200 dog with fucking walter silva on the mound. It took a 4 run 5th inning for the mets to even make a game out of it and they still lost.
I want the Giants but there's no way I'm laying over -140 on this game.
pavano isnt shitty, yes he WAS shitty but this year he looks great, no matter how much i hate to say it as a yankee fan, (we paid him to ride the DL for 2 or 3 years!), he looks VERY good this year and i would bet him almost every time but the price is too high today
0
pavano isnt shitty, yes he WAS shitty but this year he looks great, no matter how much i hate to say it as a yankee fan, (we paid him to ride the DL for 2 or 3 years!), he looks VERY good this year and i would bet him almost every time but the price is too high today
AJ- WHY DO U like arroyo and reds over garland and d-backs? Just curious to why u liek them so much fro 2 units? a LITTLE REASONING BE GREAT.
THANKS AJ
Plus money with what I believe is the better overall pitcher who has pitched much better on the road and the best overall team who has also played much better on the road (10-5). Arroyo tends to bounce back after a rough outing. The Reds offense is heating up scoring 6+ runs in 4 straight games and 5 out of 6. Arizona's shitty offense blew their load yesterday. The last time they scored 10 they followed it up with 1 the next game. They also scored 9 in the season opener and followed it up with 0 and scored 9 a few days later and followed it up with 2. They had back to back 7 run games but one of those was when they were getting shutout by carpenter and he had leave with an injury and a bunch of shitty relievers were forced to fill up some innings. After that 2nd 7 run game they put up a 0. They also had back to back 6 run games, but again, the starting pitcher went down with an injury in the 2nd inning and shitty scrubs had to come in. After that game they put up 2. So unless they get a little luck, they dont tend to put up consecutive solid offensive outings. They have also won 2 in a row at home only once this season. Bottomline is that this team sucks and if I can get plus money with the opponent then its worth a look. In this case I really liked the opponent. I'll take a 10-5 road team who is just starting to hit their stride offensively with a pitcher that loves to bounce back from poor performances. Since becoming a Red when Arroyo has given up 7er or more he has followed up the next game giving up 0,1,1,3,0,6,0 earned runs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by msu09:
AJ- WHY DO U like arroyo and reds over garland and d-backs? Just curious to why u liek them so much fro 2 units? a LITTLE REASONING BE GREAT.
THANKS AJ
Plus money with what I believe is the better overall pitcher who has pitched much better on the road and the best overall team who has also played much better on the road (10-5). Arroyo tends to bounce back after a rough outing. The Reds offense is heating up scoring 6+ runs in 4 straight games and 5 out of 6. Arizona's shitty offense blew their load yesterday. The last time they scored 10 they followed it up with 1 the next game. They also scored 9 in the season opener and followed it up with 0 and scored 9 a few days later and followed it up with 2. They had back to back 7 run games but one of those was when they were getting shutout by carpenter and he had leave with an injury and a bunch of shitty relievers were forced to fill up some innings. After that 2nd 7 run game they put up a 0. They also had back to back 6 run games, but again, the starting pitcher went down with an injury in the 2nd inning and shitty scrubs had to come in. After that game they put up 2. So unless they get a little luck, they dont tend to put up consecutive solid offensive outings. They have also won 2 in a row at home only once this season. Bottomline is that this team sucks and if I can get plus money with the opponent then its worth a look. In this case I really liked the opponent. I'll take a 10-5 road team who is just starting to hit their stride offensively with a pitcher that loves to bounce back from poor performances. Since becoming a Red when Arroyo has given up 7er or more he has followed up the next game giving up 0,1,1,3,0,6,0 earned runs.
pavano isnt shitty, yes he WAS shitty but this year he looks great, no matter how much i hate to say it as a yankee fan, (we paid him to ride the DL for 2 or 3 years!), he looks VERY good this year and i would bet him almost every time but the price is too high today
A 6.61 era, 1.52 whip, and a .310 baa is shitty...but I guess most of that damage came in one start. Only half of his games have been quality starts though and they werent much of a quality starts since two of those he went the minimum 6 innings and had to turn it over to that shitty 29th ranked bullpen. He's not a guy I'm laying any significant chalk with right now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KillaRuss07:
pavano isnt shitty, yes he WAS shitty but this year he looks great, no matter how much i hate to say it as a yankee fan, (we paid him to ride the DL for 2 or 3 years!), he looks VERY good this year and i would bet him almost every time but the price is too high today
A 6.61 era, 1.52 whip, and a .310 baa is shitty...but I guess most of that damage came in one start. Only half of his games have been quality starts though and they werent much of a quality starts since two of those he went the minimum 6 innings and had to turn it over to that shitty 29th ranked bullpen. He's not a guy I'm laying any significant chalk with right now.
Plus money with what I believe is the better overall pitcher who has pitched much better on the road and the best overall team who has also played much better on the road (10-5). Arroyo tends to bounce back after a rough outing. The Reds offense is heating up scoring 6+ runs in 4 straight games and 5 out of 6. Arizona's shitty offense blew their load yesterday. The last time they scored 10 they followed it up with 1 the next game. They also scored 9 in the season opener and followed it up with 0 and scored 9 a few days later and followed it up with 2. They had back to back 7 run games but one of those was when they were getting shutout by carpenter and he had leave with an injury and a bunch of shitty relievers were forced to fill up some innings. After that 2nd 7 run game they put up a 0. They also had back to back 6 run games, but again, the starting pitcher went down with an injury in the 2nd inning and shitty scrubs had to come in. After that game they put up 2. So unless they get a little luck, they dont tend to put up consecutive solid offensive outings. They have also won 2 in a row at home only once this season. Bottomline is that this team sucks and if I can get plus money with the opponent then its worth a look. In this case I really liked the opponent. I'll take a 10-5 road team who is just starting to hit their stride offensively with a pitcher that loves to bounce back from poor performances. Since becoming a Red when Arroyo has given up 7er or more he has followed up the next game giving up 0,1,1,3,0,6,0 earned runs.
my sentiments exactly, loving this pick more and more as i read into it, GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJPierzynski:
Plus money with what I believe is the better overall pitcher who has pitched much better on the road and the best overall team who has also played much better on the road (10-5). Arroyo tends to bounce back after a rough outing. The Reds offense is heating up scoring 6+ runs in 4 straight games and 5 out of 6. Arizona's shitty offense blew their load yesterday. The last time they scored 10 they followed it up with 1 the next game. They also scored 9 in the season opener and followed it up with 0 and scored 9 a few days later and followed it up with 2. They had back to back 7 run games but one of those was when they were getting shutout by carpenter and he had leave with an injury and a bunch of shitty relievers were forced to fill up some innings. After that 2nd 7 run game they put up a 0. They also had back to back 6 run games, but again, the starting pitcher went down with an injury in the 2nd inning and shitty scrubs had to come in. After that game they put up 2. So unless they get a little luck, they dont tend to put up consecutive solid offensive outings. They have also won 2 in a row at home only once this season. Bottomline is that this team sucks and if I can get plus money with the opponent then its worth a look. In this case I really liked the opponent. I'll take a 10-5 road team who is just starting to hit their stride offensively with a pitcher that loves to bounce back from poor performances. Since becoming a Red when Arroyo has given up 7er or more he has followed up the next game giving up 0,1,1,3,0,6,0 earned runs.
my sentiments exactly, loving this pick more and more as i read into it, GL
A 6.61 era, 1.52 whip, and a .310 baa is shitty...but I guess most of that damage came in one start. Only half of his games have been quality starts though and they werent much of a quality starts since two of those he went the minimum 6 innings and had to turn it over to that shitty 29th ranked bullpen. He's not a guy I'm laying any significant chalk with right now.
this is true, im not betting him today its too high, but whenever he's + against a pitcher that isnt doing great,(like the pavano/masterson matchup that i cashed on) i'll gladly lay 10 bucks on him to win
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJPierzynski:
A 6.61 era, 1.52 whip, and a .310 baa is shitty...but I guess most of that damage came in one start. Only half of his games have been quality starts though and they werent much of a quality starts since two of those he went the minimum 6 innings and had to turn it over to that shitty 29th ranked bullpen. He's not a guy I'm laying any significant chalk with right now.
this is true, im not betting him today its too high, but whenever he's + against a pitcher that isnt doing great,(like the pavano/masterson matchup that i cashed on) i'll gladly lay 10 bucks on him to win
AJ, like your reasoning on the Cincy pick, but like to know one thing first as I havn't seen Arroyo a lot... Is he a strike-out pitcher? Doesn't look like it on his stats as he got only 9 K's in 21 road innings and 18 in 34 innings this season (9 in 13 innings at home isn't bad tho..). Wondering cause the D'Backs hitter struggles big-time vs strike-out pichers... They just can't figure them out and the whole lineup get K'd 1 after 1...
0
AJ, like your reasoning on the Cincy pick, but like to know one thing first as I havn't seen Arroyo a lot... Is he a strike-out pitcher? Doesn't look like it on his stats as he got only 9 K's in 21 road innings and 18 in 34 innings this season (9 in 13 innings at home isn't bad tho..). Wondering cause the D'Backs hitter struggles big-time vs strike-out pichers... They just can't figure them out and the whole lineup get K'd 1 after 1...
AJ, like your reasoning on the Cincy pick, but like to know one thing first as I havn't seen Arroyo a lot... Is he a strike-out pitcher? Doesn't look like it on his stats as he got only 9 K's in 21 road innings and 18 in 34 innings this season (9 in 13 innings at home isn't bad tho..). Wondering cause the D'Backs hitter struggles big-time vs strike-out pichers... They just can't figure them out and the whole lineup get K'd 1 after 1...
He's no Lincecum but he's above average. Looking at last years numbers his K/9 stats were better than Lackey, Zambrano, Sheets, Oswalt, Cliff Lee, Shields, Webb, and Garza to name a few. He averaged 7,34 k's for every 9 innings which surprisingly was only 0.57 worse than Santana.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lucky7th:
AJ, like your reasoning on the Cincy pick, but like to know one thing first as I havn't seen Arroyo a lot... Is he a strike-out pitcher? Doesn't look like it on his stats as he got only 9 K's in 21 road innings and 18 in 34 innings this season (9 in 13 innings at home isn't bad tho..). Wondering cause the D'Backs hitter struggles big-time vs strike-out pichers... They just can't figure them out and the whole lineup get K'd 1 after 1...
He's no Lincecum but he's above average. Looking at last years numbers his K/9 stats were better than Lackey, Zambrano, Sheets, Oswalt, Cliff Lee, Shields, Webb, and Garza to name a few. He averaged 7,34 k's for every 9 innings which surprisingly was only 0.57 worse than Santana.
AJ, I would like to thank you for posting your picks here and sharing your rationonale with us. What do you think about Mets RL today?
I was leaning the other way. The Mets dont score for Johan as they are averaging only 2 rpg in his starts and they have failed to cover the RL in any of his 6 starts this year. Derek Lowe is better than a lot of those pitcher the Mets faced in those games. Although, this Met team is on a roll right now so I'm still not sure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Parlays2Win:
AJ, I would like to thank you for posting your picks here and sharing your rationonale with us. What do you think about Mets RL today?
I was leaning the other way. The Mets dont score for Johan as they are averaging only 2 rpg in his starts and they have failed to cover the RL in any of his 6 starts this year. Derek Lowe is better than a lot of those pitcher the Mets faced in those games. Although, this Met team is on a roll right now so I'm still not sure.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.