i cant believe anyone is still tailing this clown. reminds me of the band playing while the titanic sunk.
maybe when he reaches the -30 unit level this weekend people will finally get a clue.
i cant believe anyone is still tailing this clown. reminds me of the band playing while the titanic sunk.
maybe when he reaches the -30 unit level this weekend people will finally get a clue.
Amazing. This vaunted Pittsburgh bullpen gave up more runs in 3 innings last night then the previous 56 combined (based on your stats). Based on a normal distribution and your expected bullpen era this should happen about 0.02% of the time conservatively. I guess you were just unlucky.
Maybe I should do more research. Or.....maybe you should stop applying full credibility to a cherry-picked 56 innings of work.
Either way, I never came in here to flame your thread because there are enough morons here to do that. Good day sir.
Amazing. This vaunted Pittsburgh bullpen gave up more runs in 3 innings last night then the previous 56 combined (based on your stats). Based on a normal distribution and your expected bullpen era this should happen about 0.02% of the time conservatively. I guess you were just unlucky.
Maybe I should do more research. Or.....maybe you should stop applying full credibility to a cherry-picked 56 innings of work.
Either way, I never came in here to flame your thread because there are enough morons here to do that. Good day sir.
Amazing. This vaunted Pittsburgh bullpen gave up more runs in 3 innings last night then the previous 56 combined (based on your stats). Based on a normal distribution and your expected bullpen era this should happen about 0.02% of the time conservatively. I guess you were just unlucky.
Maybe I should do more research. Or.....maybe you should stop applying full credibility to a cherry-picked 56 innings of work.
Either way, I never came in here to flame your thread because there are enough morons here to do that. Good day sir.
Amazing. This vaunted Pittsburgh bullpen gave up more runs in 3 innings last night then the previous 56 combined (based on your stats). Based on a normal distribution and your expected bullpen era this should happen about 0.02% of the time conservatively. I guess you were just unlucky.
Maybe I should do more research. Or.....maybe you should stop applying full credibility to a cherry-picked 56 innings of work.
Either way, I never came in here to flame your thread because there are enough morons here to do that. Good day sir.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
If that were true and you gamble for a living what are you doing in here anyway? If I gambled for a living I wouldn't even be in here for info. Your pretty much a liar and a basher. The 13,000 plus posts in 4 months pretty much says you should do a whole lot more listening and alot less talking. Guys like you are a dime a dozen. A whole lot to say behind their computer.
well said. The odds of that guy "gambling for a living" are about the same odds as Tiger not liking a tight ass lol
Love it when douches like him make shit up thinking ANYONE would actually believe it, its just hilarious
well said. The odds of that guy "gambling for a living" are about the same odds as Tiger not liking a tight ass lol
Love it when douches like him make shit up thinking ANYONE would actually believe it, its just hilarious

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.