GH what top are your top 2,3, or 4 plays, so i can make a parley for 1/2 unit.
No offense but it seems like a silly question....I list all my games with their weights every day of the season...you can pick out the strengths based upon either the amount I am risking (i.e., LAD -136 multiplied by the 1.5 units) or the amount I am trying to win (i.e., SD +108 multiplied by the 1.75 units)....I am not trying to be insulting so sorry if my answer came across the wrong way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by razor333:
GH what top are your top 2,3, or 4 plays, so i can make a parley for 1/2 unit.
No offense but it seems like a silly question....I list all my games with their weights every day of the season...you can pick out the strengths based upon either the amount I am risking (i.e., LAD -136 multiplied by the 1.5 units) or the amount I am trying to win (i.e., SD +108 multiplied by the 1.75 units)....I am not trying to be insulting so sorry if my answer came across the wrong way.
hi GH i would like to know why you like Stults over Sanchez today. I think you don't like Sanchez because he has control problems and walks a lot of guys. I lean towards the Giants today myself because I think he will pull through today against a slumping Dodgers offense.
Stults is not impressive to me
0
hi GH i would like to know why you like Stults over Sanchez today. I think you don't like Sanchez because he has control problems and walks a lot of guys. I lean towards the Giants today myself because I think he will pull through today against a slumping Dodgers offense.
Game, your under play on the Jays / As game surprises me, I'm on the other side @ over 8.5(-115). Am I missing something on Gallagher or Tallet? Any thoughts on Jackson/Carmona under 5.5 1st 5 looks pretty tempting to me. BOL
Big concerns about the wind direction in Det/Cleve and am following it....conflciting reports....one report has high winds out to right/center at 26 mph and the other has winds at 12 mph towards third base...if the wind isn't blowing out, I can see the under for you...
I don't like the way the A's are hitting lefties....Nauert is the home plate umpire and has a generous strike zone....feel the A's play to the under at home in day games although I have to confirm that.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by mtrudell:
Game, your under play on the Jays / As game surprises me, I'm on the other side @ over 8.5(-115). Am I missing something on Gallagher or Tallet? Any thoughts on Jackson/Carmona under 5.5 1st 5 looks pretty tempting to me. BOL
Big concerns about the wind direction in Det/Cleve and am following it....conflciting reports....one report has high winds out to right/center at 26 mph and the other has winds at 12 mph towards third base...if the wind isn't blowing out, I can see the under for you...
I don't like the way the A's are hitting lefties....Nauert is the home plate umpire and has a generous strike zone....feel the A's play to the under at home in day games although I have to confirm that.....
Game have you ever kept track of your record per the value you assign each play. Curious as to how your record would be on 2.25, 2.0, etc. Just wondering if you had such a thing broken down. Not asking you to go back and do it of course. If I want the records bad enough I can do the work myself if you don't have it.
0
Game have you ever kept track of your record per the value you assign each play. Curious as to how your record would be on 2.25, 2.0, etc. Just wondering if you had such a thing broken down. Not asking you to go back and do it of course. If I want the records bad enough I can do the work myself if you don't have it.
the A's are 3-9 vs. lefty starters (3.2 rpg, .202 BA). Oakland is also just 4-7 in day games, batting .217. Tallet faced the A's on 4/18 in Toronto and allowed just 1 earned run on 4 hits in 5 1/3 innings.
Umpire Trends - Paul Nauert: Road team is 5-1 in Nauerts last 6 games behind home plate vs. Oakland. Road team is 9-3 in Nauerts last 12 games behind home plate.
0
FYI GH
the A's are 3-9 vs. lefty starters (3.2 rpg, .202 BA). Oakland is also just 4-7 in day games, batting .217. Tallet faced the A's on 4/18 in Toronto and allowed just 1 earned run on 4 hits in 5 1/3 innings.
Umpire Trends - Paul Nauert: Road team is 5-1 in Nauerts last 6 games behind home plate vs. Oakland. Road team is 9-3 in Nauerts last 12 games behind home plate.
I am a big GH Fan but if I did not know better I would think someone hacked his account today..lots of overvalued favorites on his card which he is usually NEVER on...
Boston???...Kazmir is a Sox Killer
LA Dodgers??..different team without Manny completely...have yet to win since he got booted
Chicago White Sox??...just a bad team going against a solid pitcher in Millwood
I am going the other way in all 3 so one of us will be happy today!!
0
I am a big GH Fan but if I did not know better I would think someone hacked his account today..lots of overvalued favorites on his card which he is usually NEVER on...
Boston???...Kazmir is a Sox Killer
LA Dodgers??..different team without Manny completely...have yet to win since he got booted
Chicago White Sox??...just a bad team going against a solid pitcher in Millwood
I am going the other way in all 3 so one of us will be happy today!!
No offense but it seems like a silly question....I list all my games with their weights every day of the season...you can pick out the strengths based upon either the amount I am risking (i.e., LAD -136 multiplied by the 1.5 units) or the amount I am trying to win (i.e., SD +108 multiplied by the 1.75 units)....I am not trying to be insulting so sorry if my answer came across the wrong way.
Its not insulting in anyway and thanks for your input. I know it seemed like a stupid question. With you all the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
No offense but it seems like a silly question....I list all my games with their weights every day of the season...you can pick out the strengths based upon either the amount I am risking (i.e., LAD -136 multiplied by the 1.5 units) or the amount I am trying to win (i.e., SD +108 multiplied by the 1.75 units)....I am not trying to be insulting so sorry if my answer came across the wrong way.
Its not insulting in anyway and thanks for your input. I know it seemed like a stupid question. With you all the way.
Can you speak about the Nationals/Snakes under? What has Lannan shown you on the road? He is night and day in my opinion home vs road. I understand that he is facing the snakes, but they were able to get a little something going last night.
0
I am opposite you on a couple of games today.
Can you speak about the Nationals/Snakes under? What has Lannan shown you on the road? He is night and day in my opinion home vs road. I understand that he is facing the snakes, but they were able to get a little something going last night.
the A's are 3-9 vs. lefty starters (3.2 rpg, .202 BA). Oakland is also just 4-7 in day games, batting .217. Tallet faced the A's on 4/18 in Toronto and allowed just 1 earned run on 4 hits in 5 1/3 innings.
Umpire Trends - Paul Nauert: Road team is 5-1 in Nauerts last 6 games behind home plate vs. Oakland. Road team is 9-3 in Nauerts last 12 games behind home plate.
Good info, stats and umpire info make the under look good but I can't see Gallagher shutting down the Jays in his 1st start of year. Unfortunately my book doesn't post team totals or I would rather have played Jay team total over probably could have gotten 4.5
0
Quote Originally Posted by Phuck88:
FYI GH
the A's are 3-9 vs. lefty starters (3.2 rpg, .202 BA). Oakland is also just 4-7 in day games, batting .217. Tallet faced the A's on 4/18 in Toronto and allowed just 1 earned run on 4 hits in 5 1/3 innings.
Umpire Trends - Paul Nauert: Road team is 5-1 in Nauerts last 6 games behind home plate vs. Oakland. Road team is 9-3 in Nauerts last 12 games behind home plate.
Good info, stats and umpire info make the under look good but I can't see Gallagher shutting down the Jays in his 1st start of year. Unfortunately my book doesn't post team totals or I would rather have played Jay team total over probably could have gotten 4.5
Game have you ever kept track of your record per the value you assign each play. Curious as to how your record would be on 2.25, 2.0, etc. Just wondering if you had such a thing broken down. Not asking you to go back and do it of course. If I want the records bad enough I can do the work myself if you don't have it.
wish I did...my friend BigBozo may have to help me....he knows some of my stats better than I do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JGB3:
Game have you ever kept track of your record per the value you assign each play. Curious as to how your record would be on 2.25, 2.0, etc. Just wondering if you had such a thing broken down. Not asking you to go back and do it of course. If I want the records bad enough I can do the work myself if you don't have it.
wish I did...my friend BigBozo may have to help me....he knows some of my stats better than I do.
I am a big GH Fan but if I did not know better I would think someone hacked his account today..lots of overvalued favorites on his card which he is usually NEVER on...
Boston???...Kazmir is a Sox Killer
LA Dodgers??..different team without Manny completely...have yet to win since he got booted
Chicago White Sox??...just a bad team going against a solid pitcher in Millwood
I am going the other way in all 3 so one of us will be happy today!!
about a half hour ago I commented on what a strange card it was for me so I agree.....Kazmir is completely off with his command right now and there is nothing worse for that than facing the Sawx!
Don't see this as a good matchup for the Giants as Sanchez is also struggling with his command and the line is low....with Lincecum on deck tomorrow, this is the game I think the Dodgers win for sure...
Just think Millwood is overused and his arm is a bit off.....think the Sox will get to him and Danks is still solid in my opinion....
can't fault you on being on the other sides though....just don't sweep the board on me...lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by MyBetsMoveLines:
I am a big GH Fan but if I did not know better I would think someone hacked his account today..lots of overvalued favorites on his card which he is usually NEVER on...
Boston???...Kazmir is a Sox Killer
LA Dodgers??..different team without Manny completely...have yet to win since he got booted
Chicago White Sox??...just a bad team going against a solid pitcher in Millwood
I am going the other way in all 3 so one of us will be happy today!!
about a half hour ago I commented on what a strange card it was for me so I agree.....Kazmir is completely off with his command right now and there is nothing worse for that than facing the Sawx!
Don't see this as a good matchup for the Giants as Sanchez is also struggling with his command and the line is low....with Lincecum on deck tomorrow, this is the game I think the Dodgers win for sure...
Just think Millwood is overused and his arm is a bit off.....think the Sox will get to him and Danks is still solid in my opinion....
can't fault you on being on the other sides though....just don't sweep the board on me...lol
Good info, stats and umpire info make the under look good but I can't see Gallagher shutting down the Jays in his 1st start of year. Unfortunately my book doesn't post team totals or I would rather have played Jay team total over probably could have gotten 4.5
Gallagher looked sharp against the Red Sox and is more than capable at home...good info....
0
Quote Originally Posted by mtrudell:
Good info, stats and umpire info make the under look good but I can't see Gallagher shutting down the Jays in his 1st start of year. Unfortunately my book doesn't post team totals or I would rather have played Jay team total over probably could have gotten 4.5
Gallagher looked sharp against the Red Sox and is more than capable at home...good info....
Game, give me a shout. Might be up for the Big M tonight. You have my number from my previous PM.
50/50....let's see if we can get one or two more guys like PittsburghPhil otherwise maybe we should pick a night when a few of us can all go....will be in touch!
0
Quote Originally Posted by softballmaniac:
Game, give me a shout. Might be up for the Big M tonight. You have my number from my previous PM.
50/50....let's see if we can get one or two more guys like PittsburghPhil otherwise maybe we should pick a night when a few of us can all go....will be in touch!
Sanchez has terrible control problems but he is the better pitcher here and the Giants bats have had a lot of success against Eric Stults. This will be Stults third time against the Giants and the Giants smoked him in San Francisco for a few runs last time. I like the value here with the Giants at +125 too and I think Sanchez will show this afternoon why he has one of the nastiest stuff in the big leagues!!! good luck on the rest of your plays though!
0
Sanchez has terrible control problems but he is the better pitcher here and the Giants bats have had a lot of success against Eric Stults. This will be Stults third time against the Giants and the Giants smoked him in San Francisco for a few runs last time. I like the value here with the Giants at +125 too and I think Sanchez will show this afternoon why he has one of the nastiest stuff in the big leagues!!! good luck on the rest of your plays though!
Anyone have thoughts on Josh Johnson tonight against De La Rosa? I like the Marlins but is this a trap game?
de la rosa has the stuff to shut down any team,, he is more a head case than anything else .. but i think fla bats will be over agressive here , so im expecting a low scoring game,, but a small lean to the fish,, not enough to play em thou.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mobbdeep:
Anyone have thoughts on Josh Johnson tonight against De La Rosa? I like the Marlins but is this a trap game?
de la rosa has the stuff to shut down any team,, he is more a head case than anything else .. but i think fla bats will be over agressive here , so im expecting a low scoring game,, but a small lean to the fish,, not enough to play em thou.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
