I'll bite...what the hell.
Good info SportsBath!! Thanks.
Looking forward to watching this play out and pay-out!!!
GL
Just keep doubling up and taking out as many loans as you can. Eventually you will become independently wealthy.
Just keep doubling up and taking out as many loans as you can. Eventually you will become independently wealthy.
Just keep doubling up and taking out as many loans as you can. Eventually you will become independently wealthy.
![]()
Just keep doubling up and taking out as many loans as you can. Eventually you will become independently wealthy.
![]()
Have fun doubling your bet tomorrow SportsBath.
I'll be cheering for the over ... (again).
Just to clarify, you are now 0-5 on your last picks right ??
Have fun doubling your bet tomorrow SportsBath.
I'll be cheering for the over ... (again).
Just to clarify, you are now 0-5 on your last picks right ??
I have just read this whole thread and have to say it is hot in here.
1. The Man believes in his system.
2.He has gone back 5 years on his stats to back up his system
3. Individual losses dont mean anything in a chase system
4. Give the man his 7 days for each play and let the record speak for itself. Don't say its a loss until he loses all 7.
5. If you don't want to try it then don't.
6. If you dont have the correct money management you will lose
I have just read this whole thread and have to say it is hot in here.
1. The Man believes in his system.
2.He has gone back 5 years on his stats to back up his system
3. Individual losses dont mean anything in a chase system
4. Give the man his 7 days for each play and let the record speak for itself. Don't say its a loss until he loses all 7.
5. If you don't want to try it then don't.
6. If you dont have the correct money management you will lose
No one is arguing that the majority of the time this system will just about break even (which judging from his posts would be an excellent result for this idiot).
But call it whatever you like, this is just his variation of a Martingale system, which is discredited by gamblers around the World.
Assuming a unit is a measley $100 and his bankroll is 30k as he says ![]()
Do you realise that's only 9 ... let me say that again NINE ... losses until he is basically busto ???
$100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / 3200 / 6400 / 12800 / 25600
So that means for someone with a more realistic bankroll (let's say $5k) after 5 losses you are now wagering more than 30% of your bankroll trying to break even and after 6 losses more than 2/3 of your bankroll is being bet trying to "chase".
GL with that.
No one is arguing that the majority of the time this system will just about break even (which judging from his posts would be an excellent result for this idiot).
But call it whatever you like, this is just his variation of a Martingale system, which is discredited by gamblers around the World.
Assuming a unit is a measley $100 and his bankroll is 30k as he says ![]()
Do you realise that's only 9 ... let me say that again NINE ... losses until he is basically busto ???
$100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / 3200 / 6400 / 12800 / 25600
So that means for someone with a more realistic bankroll (let's say $5k) after 5 losses you are now wagering more than 30% of your bankroll trying to break even and after 6 losses more than 2/3 of your bankroll is being bet trying to "chase".
GL with that.
PLEASE , PLEASE, PLEASE, PUT A MONETARY VALUE HERE. TO SAY TWO UNITS IS CRIMINAL BECAUSE IT IGNORES THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF ALL FOR A GAMBLER WHICH IS JUICE!!!!
JUICE, JUICE , JUICE EVER LOVING ALL KNOWING JUICE.
I AM GOING TO SAY 250 IN THE FIRST GAMES FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT.
-250 PLUS - 250 = 500...
THAT MEANS WE GOING 550 AND 550 TO WIN 500? THAT SOUNDS GOOD TO ME MR MARTINGALE.....
GOOD LUCK AS ALWAYS - CRASH
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLEASE , PLEASE, PLEASE, PUT A MONETARY VALUE HERE. TO SAY TWO UNITS IS CRIMINAL BECAUSE IT IGNORES THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF ALL FOR A GAMBLER WHICH IS JUICE!!!!
JUICE, JUICE , JUICE EVER LOVING ALL KNOWING JUICE.
I AM GOING TO SAY 250 IN THE FIRST GAMES FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT.
-250 PLUS - 250 = 500...
THAT MEANS WE GOING 550 AND 550 TO WIN 500? THAT SOUNDS GOOD TO ME MR MARTINGALE.....
GOOD LUCK AS ALWAYS - CRASH
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
OR ARE WE GOING TO NICKEL ONLY-
500 TO WIN 450????
UP TO YOU BRO- HELP US OUT.....
I GOTTA THINK WE GO 550?![]()
OR ARE WE GOING TO NICKEL ONLY-
500 TO WIN 450????
UP TO YOU BRO- HELP US OUT.....
I GOTTA THINK WE GO 550?![]()
I have just read this whole thread and have to say it is hot in here.
3. Individual losses dont mean anything in a chase system
Tell that to his bookie who he owes $10,000 to. After all, money grows on trees, and losses are really irrelevant when it comes to gambling.
I have just read this whole thread and have to say it is hot in here.
3. Individual losses dont mean anything in a chase system
Tell that to his bookie who he owes $10,000 to. After all, money grows on trees, and losses are really irrelevant when it comes to gambling.
Chasers have never heard of the wise mantra to "expect the unexpected." And people try to reinvent the wheel. Let's say for all practical purposes that chasing losses worked. You would have a bunch of rich people walking around, extolling its virtues. The reality is that the people pimping this useless system do not even have two nickels to rub together.
Chasers have never heard of the wise mantra to "expect the unexpected." And people try to reinvent the wheel. Let's say for all practical purposes that chasing losses worked. You would have a bunch of rich people walking around, extolling its virtues. The reality is that the people pimping this useless system do not even have two nickels to rub together.
Hello Sportsbath,
Thanks for the system. I do not really like it though. I doubled up on both games and cashed with the Dodgers under tonight. I will double up again tomorrow with Seattle, but after that I am done with the system.
I did think about continuing to play the system, but just lowering my units from $100 to $10 that way I could afford to chase into a 4th or 5th game. What do you think?
![]()
Hello Sportsbath,
Thanks for the system. I do not really like it though. I doubled up on both games and cashed with the Dodgers under tonight. I will double up again tomorrow with Seattle, but after that I am done with the system.
I did think about continuing to play the system, but just lowering my units from $100 to $10 that way I could afford to chase into a 4th or 5th game. What do you think?
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.