All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

i posted 400 and -0 a while a go now i will show you

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7968
Posts: 122
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 2594
Posted: #51

SportsBath .. your system intrigues me.

Maybe you should come up with a name for this type of betting ...

Can I suggest, Martingale ??

I wonder if anyone has ever tried such a system before throughout history ?? If you lose, keep doubling your bet until you win.

Absolute genius !!!!!!

You will make millions.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 2594
Posted: #52

Maybe you could also start by posting a real record ...

Let's start from today where you are already 0-3.

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #53
400-3 isnt bad
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1515
Posted: #54
Hey, you two, I wouldn't insult SportsBath. He will begin typing in all caps and calling you names.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by luckyshades:

SportsBath .. your system intrigues me.

Maybe you should come up with a name for this type of betting ...

Can I suggest, Martingale ??

I wonder if anyone has ever tried such a system before throughout history ?? If you lose, keep doubling your bet until you win.

Absolute genius !!!!!!

You will make millions.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #56

Where's sports BLOODbath when you need him?  Flipping a coin or playing red/black at roulette, chasing in blackjack, etc.  is no different than what he is suggesting.  He is just too stupid to realize it.  It is the Martingale (Morrison) system, and it a SURE way to go broke.  Betting a lot to win a little is asinine.  And FWIW, saying you have a 30K bankroll is laughable. 

You would serve yourself just as well by chasing horse losses with continuous chalk wagers.  The only system that works in the long run is to respect the odds and look to play contrarian to what the public is doing on a particular game.  Also, researching the matchup adds to the axiom that the "harder you work, the luckier you get." 

There are NO shortcuts or systems.  But losers and lazy cappers will always look for one.  I should know; I use to be one of those naive, foolish people.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by chicawowwow:



Jumbo, the guy is just sharing his system. Should be thanking him for sharing, not hating. Even if it works out or not, at least he's cool enough to share his system to us in here.

He is doing no one any favors by promoting a system that is completely flawed and foolish.  The only thanks he deserves will come when he apologizes for giving such awful gambling advice.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 237
Posted: #58
today monday is the 1st play.......i unit on under dodgers,,,and 1unit on under  mariners.........
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 14091
Posted: #59

I will try it.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 8525
Posted: #60
LOL!!!!

What a joke!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #61
what a stupid system.. sportsbath is also known as sportsgenius at statfox. he's nothing but a clown
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2081
Posted: #62
Give the guy a break. He's trying to help. Geez
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by Bucks10:

Give the guy a break. He's trying to help. Geez

Exactly.  Let him lead his flock of sheep off the cliff. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #64

Quote Originally Posted by sportsbath:

today monday is the 1st play.......i unit on under dodgers,,,and 1unit on under  mariners.........

You already went 0-3 the other day, so this is not your first play.  I might upset your gullible followers by bringing this to their attention.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by wizardofroz:

Any time you lose a game, regardless if you are chasing, must be considered a LOSS.  I agree that it is very hard to score runs on the West coast at night, but the numbers are adjusted for that.  That is why you see totals of 6' in California and Seattle at night.  Your overall record is all that matters.  Anybody can say they are chasing and conveniently forget about their losses, which makes the record you posted complete bullshit.  Good luck, but just like any chase system like John Morrison's, you will eventually get crushed during a small losing streak.  

There has never been a total 6 on the west coast this year? Where did you come up with that 1? Unless I missed maybe 1, but I doubt it.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #66
Looked at this system, it seems to work pretty good. The KEY is, wait for a 7 or longer game homestand just like the man said. Another key is, when you play all five teams the risk factor of a major losing streak is far more less, cause at least 1 or 2 of the teams you have will hit.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #67
I know, today right, Little Timmy V. Jimenez, that's an exception. This kind of match-up calls  for a 6 total.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #68
Dodgers and Seattle are the plays today
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by Billy-BlueHawk:

so are the three series starting tonight on west coast all under plays????
No, it has to be a 7 game home stand starting with game 1, it's too late to jump in a middle of a 7 game home stand
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 228
Posted: #70
sportsbath, it looks like a good thing but I am puzzled why you said on post #18 that there are only 4 teams (or the fab 4 as you said). But then on post #23 you show 6 teams.

Just curious. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by wizardofroz:

You already went 0-3 the other day, so this is not your first play.  I might upset your gullible followers by bringing this to their attention.

Those plays were not the right plays, 5-28. The man said, a 7 game or longer homestand
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #72

GL-

really I mean it

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by sportsbath:

fellows i start with 250 go to nickel then dime then 2 dimes then 4 dimes...my bank roll is 30 dimes.....so i start with 8% of my bankroll.....has the money go's up the 8%stays the same but the bankroll increases has your making money so your first bet should be what ever your 8%of your bank roll is...look at this has has a investment like the market...the the differnce this one works....look at your monthly when betting and your yearly not your daily or weekly...beat the book methodicaly....using % in your favor like this system shows you.......remember you never go broke taking a profit no matter the amount

By this I hear you say that you are betting $250 on the under for the Dodgers and Mariners. Is that 250 to win 225 or 278 to win 250?

We should be clear on this, don't you agree? Is this correct?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 237
Posted: #74
lay what ever juice it is,,,,,
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 237
Posted: #75
someone sid i was sportsgenius,,,,,,,,i saw his post and he is aclown......iam a pro gambler for 35years...and i work my ass off finding things like this sytem that take the risk out of gambling to collect the money......i am my own man,,,,,,he is a idiot.....these are the first plays since i posted in this system......since it is the first games of a 7 game or more home stand........so from here on out  judge what i do.......let the games speak for who i am....under dodgers 1 unit.....under mariners..1 unit......till then god bless....and good luck
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.