Hey Bobby. Hope you had a good break. When I looked at your play I was wondering if you could give some insight. Being a square, I noticed that Maholm is red hot. Jimenez has pitched better lately, but not as well as Maholm. My book does not offer 1 RL, so just wondering what your where thinking.
Thannks.
GL ||clover.gif' border=0>
0
Hey Bobby. Hope you had a good break. When I looked at your play I was wondering if you could give some insight. Being a square, I noticed that Maholm is red hot. Jimenez has pitched better lately, but not as well as Maholm. My book does not offer 1 RL, so just wondering what your where thinking.
Thannks.
GL ||clover.gif' border=0>
Congrats on the christening Bobby, and thanks for the input. I agree with your assessment of this site as a class act, although I can't pick my nose when it comes to baseball and I've been too dumb to just tag along on your picks.
Best of luck with the baby and TB.
0
Congrats on the christening Bobby, and thanks for the input. I agree with your assessment of this site as a class act, although I can't pick my nose when it comes to baseball and I've been too dumb to just tag along on your picks.
Best of luck with the baby and TB.
F: 3-5 Rockies
Thanks fellas. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
WB - Thanks buddy. I noticed that you have asked me this question twice now and I don't take offense to it and actually appreciate it but truth is that some plays are not backed up by logic. As a matter of fact, most winning plays seemingly come off as "dangerous" or "foolish". Because of this, I have learned to pick with my intuition. Most gamblers who lose fail to smarten up and gamble away in denial thinking logical plays make sense therefore it's profitable. That's not how the real world works. There are mainly two schools of thoughts when it comes to decision-making, one works and the other fails miserably:
1. Classical model of decision-making
2. Recognition-primed decision model
Guess which one works. Here's a hint...research the second one. I would also advise reading books by Gary A. Klein. GL||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
39-20-2 $7,181.65
0
F: 3-5 Rockies
Thanks fellas. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
WB - Thanks buddy. I noticed that you have asked me this question twice now and I don't take offense to it and actually appreciate it but truth is that some plays are not backed up by logic. As a matter of fact, most winning plays seemingly come off as "dangerous" or "foolish". Because of this, I have learned to pick with my intuition. Most gamblers who lose fail to smarten up and gamble away in denial thinking logical plays make sense therefore it's profitable. That's not how the real world works. There are mainly two schools of thoughts when it comes to decision-making, one works and the other fails miserably:
1. Classical model of decision-making
2. Recognition-primed decision model
Guess which one works. Here's a hint...research the second one. I would also advise reading books by Gary A. Klein. GL||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
39-20-2 $7,181.65
Nice way to start the 2nd half Bobby. Glad to here your in laws are back to Roseville. At least the heat and fire smoke has finally cleared. Also that is great about your son. Anyway nice hit.
Take care Boss.
||an_clap.gif' border=0>
0
Nice way to start the 2nd half Bobby. Glad to here your in laws are back to Roseville. At least the heat and fire smoke has finally cleared. Also that is great about your son. Anyway nice hit.
Take care Boss.
||an_clap.gif' border=0>
Thanks Bobby. I'll check those models out today (thank goddness for Google). The good news is I did follow you yesterday. I know you sometimes make bets that seem against the grain, and I went with you because my gut told me you were on to something. I look forward to today's tout.
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Thanks Bobby. I'll check those models out today (thank goddness for Google). The good news is I did follow you yesterday. I know you sometimes make bets that seem against the grain, and I went with you because my gut told me you were on to something. I look forward to today's tout.
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Thanks guys.
39-20-2 $7,181.65Issue #60
__________________________________________________
My Pick: Arroyo and The Reds +103
Good Luck. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Thanks guys.
39-20-2 $7,181.65Issue #60
__________________________________________________
My Pick: Arroyo and The Reds +103
Good Luck. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
GL bobby - can't make up my mind on that one, but like the over. Liked the Mets initially, but somethin made me hold back. Keep it rollin||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>
0
GL bobby - can't make up my mind on that one, but like the over. Liked the Mets initially, but somethin made me hold back. Keep it rollin||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>
Why stand in front of an oncoming train?
Because that's what my intuition told me. You are free to bet whatever you like WB. GL whatever you bet on.||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>
cashin - That "something", more often than not, is right. That's all I can say. GL with the over. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Mike - Actually, this line is what I expected. Mets still a slight fave to the square. The linesmaker did a great job opening with the Mets looking tasty as I think public are now looking just a little more conservative if they still want to ride with the Mets. At -135 or something like that, It would be less tasty. -107 is a perfect impression to present to Joe Public. Just coming along nicely. ||an_light.gif' border=0>||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Why stand in front of an oncoming train?
Because that's what my intuition told me. You are free to bet whatever you like WB. GL whatever you bet on.||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>
cashin - That "something", more often than not, is right. That's all I can say. GL with the over. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Mike - Actually, this line is what I expected. Mets still a slight fave to the square. The linesmaker did a great job opening with the Mets looking tasty as I think public are now looking just a little more conservative if they still want to ride with the Mets. At -135 or something like that, It would be less tasty. -107 is a perfect impression to present to Joe Public. Just coming along nicely. ||an_light.gif' border=0>||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Like I said Bobby no disrespect. Just surprised with your tout. I hope you win. Who knows, by game time I might jump on board.
GL ||clover.gif' border=0> ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Like I said Bobby no disrespect. Just surprised with your tout. I hope you win. Who knows, by game time I might jump on board.
GL ||clover.gif' border=0> ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
Mets "have" to lose one sooner or later: 10-0 in last 10 is obscene.
They did just pull into a tie with PHIL & FLA only 1&1/2 back.
If they are focused more on standings than streak it could very well be 11th win.
No idea what type of decision making it is, but coin-flip between Mets or pass. (heads=pass)
0
Mets "have" to lose one sooner or later: 10-0 in last 10 is obscene.
They did just pull into a tie with PHIL & FLA only 1&1/2 back.
If they are focused more on standings than streak it could very well be 11th win.
No idea what type of decision making it is, but coin-flip between Mets or pass. (heads=pass)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.