Indians are playing better, jo jo is returning to form.
Red sox are just destroying the ball beckett has been solid, like the odds here for the red sox to get the win by 3 runs or more.
Pirates have been dominant against the cubs, both pitchers have been hit well by the opposing team however the pirates have a bit more work against lopez. Think the cubs in for an offensive let down after the explosion last night.
Rockies have hit lannan well in their career, they should be getting back cargo and tulo which is a big lift for the offense. Rockies should be able to get the opener in DC.
Like the angels to win by 2 or more with Santana on the bump against a mariners team that has been quiet of late. Angels have been on fire and there is good value for the RL. ML is the safer option with much more juice though.
Mets should get the opener in SF, who knows though, vogel has been great but the giants aren't hitting well and that ol' knuckleballer gives cold hitters fits. Like the value here for the mets to grind out a win.
BOL 2 all tonight.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Overall record 126-148-2 -8.15 Units
Indians ML - 114
Red Sox RL -2.5 +165
Pirates ML -120
Rockies ML +121
Angels RL -1.5 +135
Mets +124
Indians are playing better, jo jo is returning to form.
Red sox are just destroying the ball beckett has been solid, like the odds here for the red sox to get the win by 3 runs or more.
Pirates have been dominant against the cubs, both pitchers have been hit well by the opposing team however the pirates have a bit more work against lopez. Think the cubs in for an offensive let down after the explosion last night.
Rockies have hit lannan well in their career, they should be getting back cargo and tulo which is a big lift for the offense. Rockies should be able to get the opener in DC.
Like the angels to win by 2 or more with Santana on the bump against a mariners team that has been quiet of late. Angels have been on fire and there is good value for the RL. ML is the safer option with much more juice though.
Mets should get the opener in SF, who knows though, vogel has been great but the giants aren't hitting well and that ol' knuckleballer gives cold hitters fits. Like the value here for the mets to grind out a win.
guys its friday; today is the bookie's day avoid big team runlines
you a rook who bets 80 parlays a night, been doing this since i was 18. Hence why i'm doing RL's chances are if the two teams i took on the RL are gonna win it's gonna be by a decent amount. If either of these games are 1 or 2 run games i see it going the dogs way. So instead of eating the heavy juice i'm minimizing risk and maximizing reward based on the statistical probability of how many runs a team wins by in this given situation.
Advanced statistics may have been the worse math class i ever took part in but it has some uses.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_True:
guys its friday; today is the bookie's day avoid big team runlines
you a rook who bets 80 parlays a night, been doing this since i was 18. Hence why i'm doing RL's chances are if the two teams i took on the RL are gonna win it's gonna be by a decent amount. If either of these games are 1 or 2 run games i see it going the dogs way. So instead of eating the heavy juice i'm minimizing risk and maximizing reward based on the statistical probability of how many runs a team wins by in this given situation.
Advanced statistics may have been the worse math class i ever took part in but it has some uses.
you a rook who bets 80 parlays a night, been doing this since i was 18. Hence why i'm doing RL's chances are if the two teams i took on the RL are gonna win it's gonna be by a decent amount. If either of these games are 1 or 2 run games i see it going the dogs way. So instead of eating the heavy juice i'm minimizing risk and maximizing reward based on the statistical probability of how many runs a team wins by in this given situation.
Advanced statistics may have been the worse math class i ever took part in but it has some uses.
I do kinda agree with him, about Friday being a booky's day...
But no where in your plays do I see big team RL's.
0
Quote Originally Posted by eliminat0r85:
you a rook who bets 80 parlays a night, been doing this since i was 18. Hence why i'm doing RL's chances are if the two teams i took on the RL are gonna win it's gonna be by a decent amount. If either of these games are 1 or 2 run games i see it going the dogs way. So instead of eating the heavy juice i'm minimizing risk and maximizing reward based on the statistical probability of how many runs a team wins by in this given situation.
Advanced statistics may have been the worse math class i ever took part in but it has some uses.
I do kinda agree with him, about Friday being a booky's day...
But no where in your plays do I see big team RL's.
I think he was pointing out the red sox and angels bets. Like i said though if they win there is a great chance that in the games they win it will be by enough to cover the run line, and if its a game where the dog covers the rl the dog wins more often then not.
So instead of take -200 and -160 juice, i'm adding a little bit of risk, a lot less then people realize for a solid profit at the odds given. If it loses it loses but math wise and do to current trends they are solid plays.
0
I think he was pointing out the red sox and angels bets. Like i said though if they win there is a great chance that in the games they win it will be by enough to cover the run line, and if its a game where the dog covers the rl the dog wins more often then not.
So instead of take -200 and -160 juice, i'm adding a little bit of risk, a lot less then people realize for a solid profit at the odds given. If it loses it loses but math wise and do to current trends they are solid plays.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.