None of the calls from the passengers ever happened. And they had to have one of the planes go down just to make the whole day look more believable. It's just crazy how incompetent the government can be on a day to day basis, yet how brilliant they can be when you need them to be.
You do not contribute to finding the criminals in this by this type of post. What difference does it make if the calls from the passengers ever happened? How would one plane going down make it "...look more believable".
Do you think the government was merely "incompetent" on this day. Who in the government did this?
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
None of the calls from the passengers ever happened. And they had to have one of the planes go down just to make the whole day look more believable. It's just crazy how incompetent the government can be on a day to day basis, yet how brilliant they can be when you need them to be.
You do not contribute to finding the criminals in this by this type of post. What difference does it make if the calls from the passengers ever happened? How would one plane going down make it "...look more believable".
Do you think the government was merely "incompetent" on this day. Who in the government did this?
no, no, no. it was this dude jeff. i used to buy weed from him behind the tasty freeze and i remember on 9/10/01 he was all 'dude. i just got busted again. i fucking hate the government. like, getting in my business and stuff.' we then got high and had a beef and bean burrito.
i am certain it was him...
0
no, no, no. it was this dude jeff. i used to buy weed from him behind the tasty freeze and i remember on 9/10/01 he was all 'dude. i just got busted again. i fucking hate the government. like, getting in my business and stuff.' we then got high and had a beef and bean burrito.
BTW Paddy -- how many times in recorded history has a steel building like the twin towers been hit with an airplane full of highly flammable fuel? Could you show me any portion or link to the NIST report where they blame burning papers and office furniture instead of, you know, wildly burning jet fuel?
0
BTW Paddy -- how many times in recorded history has a steel building like the twin towers been hit with an airplane full of highly flammable fuel? Could you show me any portion or link to the NIST report where they blame burning papers and office furniture instead of, you know, wildly burning jet fuel?
"There is zero chance that Tower 7 was anything but a
controlled demolition. It was, most likely, the Tower that was to be
hit by flight 96. When it didn't make it, they didn't know what to do,
and then they said fuck it, we have to blow it anyway. And down it went."
ZERO chance? None whatsoever? I feel like you ruin some of your credibility when you refuse to acknowledge even the remotest of possibilities that perhaps you are incorrect. Anyone this certain about anything usually has blinders on.
0
"There is zero chance that Tower 7 was anything but a
controlled demolition. It was, most likely, the Tower that was to be
hit by flight 96. When it didn't make it, they didn't know what to do,
and then they said fuck it, we have to blow it anyway. And down it went."
ZERO chance? None whatsoever? I feel like you ruin some of your credibility when you refuse to acknowledge even the remotest of possibilities that perhaps you are incorrect. Anyone this certain about anything usually has blinders on.
when the impossible has been eliminated, whatever remains, no matter how improbable it may seen to your puny, ignorant, incompetent mind, is the truth.
stop spewing nonsense
you're a jackass
0
kapono you are an imbecile
the laws of physics dont just cease to exist
when the impossible has been eliminated, whatever remains, no matter how improbable it may seen to your puny, ignorant, incompetent mind, is the truth.
You do not contribute to finding the criminals in this by this type of post. What difference does it make if the calls from the passengers ever happened? How would one plane going down make it "...look more believable".
Do you think the government was merely "incompetent" on this day. Who in the government did this?
Satire it was
-Yoda
0
Quote Originally Posted by PaddyMacR:
You do not contribute to finding the criminals in this by this type of post. What difference does it make if the calls from the passengers ever happened? How would one plane going down make it "...look more believable".
Do you think the government was merely "incompetent" on this day. Who in the government did this?
"There is zero chance that Tower 7 was anything but a controlled demolition. It was, most likely, the Tower that was to be hit by flight 96. When it didn't make it, they didn't know what to do, and then they said fuck it, we have to blow it anyway. And down it went."
ZERO chance? None whatsoever? I feel like you ruin some of your credibility when you refuse to acknowledge even the remotest of possibilities that perhaps you are incorrect. Anyone this certain about anything usually has blinders on.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
"There is zero chance that Tower 7 was anything but a controlled demolition. It was, most likely, the Tower that was to be hit by flight 96. When it didn't make it, they didn't know what to do, and then they said fuck it, we have to blow it anyway. And down it went."
ZERO chance? None whatsoever? I feel like you ruin some of your credibility when you refuse to acknowledge even the remotest of possibilities that perhaps you are incorrect. Anyone this certain about anything usually has blinders on.
Why because I post about common sense facts while you 2 fools believe in things that are impossible?
No, because you don't win an argument by unilaterally declaring what you say to be "common sense facts". Those are the tactics of an intellectual buttplug.
There is nothing that I believe that is impossible. Your problem is that you believe it is impossible that Americans were responsible for most of the murders or 911. In order to do that, you have to believe that some papers burning in offices caused tower 7 to collapse, in an incredible coincidence, EXACTLY like buildings collapse when they are brought down in a controlled demolition. Exactly.
All of that is in the face of a common sense fact, i.e. a certain fact, that a steel building of any size has never before collapsed from fire. Certainly not EXACTLY mimicing a controlled demolition while doing so.
You don't post about common sense. You are a fucking idiot child that this place is famous for, perhaps unjustly, because the fact is there seem to be more clued in people on here than any other forum.
Except you. If you were travel at the speed of light for 19 months, you'd only then be approaching your first clue.
Kapish.
Leave the smart stuff to smart people. You're like a paraplegic demanding to be allowed to play for the New York Rangers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Why because I post about common sense facts while you 2 fools believe in things that are impossible?
No, because you don't win an argument by unilaterally declaring what you say to be "common sense facts". Those are the tactics of an intellectual buttplug.
There is nothing that I believe that is impossible. Your problem is that you believe it is impossible that Americans were responsible for most of the murders or 911. In order to do that, you have to believe that some papers burning in offices caused tower 7 to collapse, in an incredible coincidence, EXACTLY like buildings collapse when they are brought down in a controlled demolition. Exactly.
All of that is in the face of a common sense fact, i.e. a certain fact, that a steel building of any size has never before collapsed from fire. Certainly not EXACTLY mimicing a controlled demolition while doing so.
You don't post about common sense. You are a fucking idiot child that this place is famous for, perhaps unjustly, because the fact is there seem to be more clued in people on here than any other forum.
Except you. If you were travel at the speed of light for 19 months, you'd only then be approaching your first clue.
Kapish.
Leave the smart stuff to smart people. You're like a paraplegic demanding to be allowed to play for the New York Rangers.
when the impossible has been eliminated, whatever remains, no matter how improbable it may seen to your puny, ignorant, incompetent mind, is the truth.
stop spewing nonsense
you're a jackass
Kapono is not an imbecile. He is an American who demonstrates cognitive dissonance as do 40% of his countrymen. Cognitive dissonance is an uneasy state that occurs in the mind and thinking processes when long held beliefs are challenged by irrefutable facts.
Americans believe a sort of Alice in Wonderland story about American and its "democracy" and how they invented and preserved freedom for the world. It's a complete horseshit story. In this case, Kapono has those beliefs challenged by the fact you'd have to be dumber than dogshit not to know Tower 7 was certainly brought down by controlled demolition, because it didn't have any burning jet fuel in it, it only had papers and office furniture and probably a great deal of fireproof material.
But the tall towers did. That allows Kapono to relieve his dissonance by ignoring the remarkable resemblance to buildings coming down by controlled demolition, the remarkable resemblance to Tower 7 coming down, and continuing to believe in the fantasy America he has in his head, the one where Americans don't kill 3000 of their fellow Americans, with some complicity from people in the government.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:
kapono you are an imbecile
the laws of physics dont just cease to exist
when the impossible has been eliminated, whatever remains, no matter how improbable it may seen to your puny, ignorant, incompetent mind, is the truth.
stop spewing nonsense
you're a jackass
Kapono is not an imbecile. He is an American who demonstrates cognitive dissonance as do 40% of his countrymen. Cognitive dissonance is an uneasy state that occurs in the mind and thinking processes when long held beliefs are challenged by irrefutable facts.
Americans believe a sort of Alice in Wonderland story about American and its "democracy" and how they invented and preserved freedom for the world. It's a complete horseshit story. In this case, Kapono has those beliefs challenged by the fact you'd have to be dumber than dogshit not to know Tower 7 was certainly brought down by controlled demolition, because it didn't have any burning jet fuel in it, it only had papers and office furniture and probably a great deal of fireproof material.
But the tall towers did. That allows Kapono to relieve his dissonance by ignoring the remarkable resemblance to buildings coming down by controlled demolition, the remarkable resemblance to Tower 7 coming down, and continuing to believe in the fantasy America he has in his head, the one where Americans don't kill 3000 of their fellow Americans, with some complicity from people in the government.
Dogunder even said that there were no Hijackers responsible. You also believe this?
No, I don't. I believe it is quite possible that there was some fuckwitted hijackers plan, and that they actually got on the airplanes. I also believe that all of their plans were known and that one scenario which is quite realistic is that the aircraft were taken over remotely and either crashed into the buildings and the field, or were switched for empty drones which were then crashed into the buildings, etc.
That of course leaves the question of where are the original planes.
There is some very suspicious evidence these aircraft were being remotely piloted. Or they could have been piloted by the real crews under threat to low altitude and then taken over by these terrorists, but I am much more inclined to the remote pilot theory. Certainly the technology is there, and the Boeing 767 and 757 were the only commercial aircraft with the capability of being equipped for remote pilotage. But Momammed Atta and those other dorks did not fly those planes as alleged.
I'm a 7000 Airline Transport Pilot and I couldn't have done that. Most airline pilots will tell you that the story about Arabs with a few flight lessons doing this is complete and utter horseshit.
For instance, there is an official story that Atta's passport miracuously fluttered to the ground and was found intact, thereby implicating him. And that his luggage was left in his car, with a note saying what he was up to. Which begs the question of why he took his passport, and why no one noticed he didn't have any luggage.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Dogunder even said that there were no Hijackers responsible. You also believe this?
No, I don't. I believe it is quite possible that there was some fuckwitted hijackers plan, and that they actually got on the airplanes. I also believe that all of their plans were known and that one scenario which is quite realistic is that the aircraft were taken over remotely and either crashed into the buildings and the field, or were switched for empty drones which were then crashed into the buildings, etc.
That of course leaves the question of where are the original planes.
There is some very suspicious evidence these aircraft were being remotely piloted. Or they could have been piloted by the real crews under threat to low altitude and then taken over by these terrorists, but I am much more inclined to the remote pilot theory. Certainly the technology is there, and the Boeing 767 and 757 were the only commercial aircraft with the capability of being equipped for remote pilotage. But Momammed Atta and those other dorks did not fly those planes as alleged.
I'm a 7000 Airline Transport Pilot and I couldn't have done that. Most airline pilots will tell you that the story about Arabs with a few flight lessons doing this is complete and utter horseshit.
For instance, there is an official story that Atta's passport miracuously fluttered to the ground and was found intact, thereby implicating him. And that his luggage was left in his car, with a note saying what he was up to. Which begs the question of why he took his passport, and why no one noticed he didn't have any luggage.
MoneySRH says there were Hijackers, yet both guys support the conspiracy theory. Who is right?
Who is right. The people who point out that Tower 7 was obviously brought down by controlled demolition and draw the appropriate conclusions from that.
What grade are you in?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
MoneySRH says there were Hijackers, yet both guys support the conspiracy theory. Who is right?
Who is right. The people who point out that Tower 7 was obviously brought down by controlled demolition and draw the appropriate conclusions from that.
Then why do the people that were actually there say otherwise?
Well, of course somebody is going to say otherwise.
Do you seriously think the people that planned this, and pulled it off because of people like you, thought no one would notice that controlled demolition of the towers looked exactly like controlled demolition of the towers? Do you think they were thinking "Duh, what are we going to say when people ask why the towers fell down?"
Within about two minutes of the towers falling, there is some plant in front of the tv cameras, yelling "They came down from the impact of the airliners hitting them and because the fire weakened the structure." Within two fucking minutes, one guy is screaming out the planted answer on TV.
Where is that fucker? Why hasn't he been waterboarded to get him to tell us who planted him there.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Then why do the people that were actually there say otherwise?
Well, of course somebody is going to say otherwise.
Do you seriously think the people that planned this, and pulled it off because of people like you, thought no one would notice that controlled demolition of the towers looked exactly like controlled demolition of the towers? Do you think they were thinking "Duh, what are we going to say when people ask why the towers fell down?"
Within about two minutes of the towers falling, there is some plant in front of the tv cameras, yelling "They came down from the impact of the airliners hitting them and because the fire weakened the structure." Within two fucking minutes, one guy is screaming out the planted answer on TV.
Where is that fucker? Why hasn't he been waterboarded to get him to tell us who planted him there.
You know what? If you guys want to believe in your theories, fine. I just don't see how so many people(It would have taken at least 1,000) could have gotten together and pulled all of this off without 1 single person blowing the whistle.
This is why you are dumb. One of many reasons, actually.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
You know what? If you guys want to believe in your theories, fine. I just don't see how so many people(It would have taken at least 1,000) could have gotten together and pulled all of this off without 1 single person blowing the whistle.
This is why you are dumb. One of many reasons, actually.
But I need you to stop acting like you know anything, close your mouth, stop spitting lies and ignorant nonsense, take notes, listen and grow.
Lets start here. What makes you come up the number of 1000? And why would you say it is impossible for all of them to "blow the whistle".
You really believe this would be shared with people who would have a problem maintaining this as a secret???
I can assure you, with so much at stake, not only would it be very easy to not tell anyone about it, but it would be vital and a matter of self-preservation. They have no choice but to not discuss it.
0
If you really want to be schooled, I am capable.
But I need you to stop acting like you know anything, close your mouth, stop spitting lies and ignorant nonsense, take notes, listen and grow.
Lets start here. What makes you come up the number of 1000? And why would you say it is impossible for all of them to "blow the whistle".
You really believe this would be shared with people who would have a problem maintaining this as a secret???
I can assure you, with so much at stake, not only would it be very easy to not tell anyone about it, but it would be vital and a matter of self-preservation. They have no choice but to not discuss it.
I can assure you, with so much at stake, not only would it be very easy to not tell anyone about it, but it would be vital and a matter of self-preservation. They have no choice but to not discuss it.
I Have to say with absolute honesty that I really do appreciate what you posted that I quoted. There is an old saying that for two people to keep a secret one of them has to be dead.
Basic human nature, psychology 101 dictates that people just have to impress others. Desperation to be relevant, if not superior to others is why people just have to tell secrets in an effort to prove they know more than others.
Thank you and please, do keep posting...
0
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:
I can assure you, with so much at stake, not only would it be very easy to not tell anyone about it, but it would be vital and a matter of self-preservation. They have no choice but to not discuss it.
I Have to say with absolute honesty that I really do appreciate what you posted that I quoted. There is an old saying that for two people to keep a secret one of them has to be dead.
Basic human nature, psychology 101 dictates that people just have to impress others. Desperation to be relevant, if not superior to others is why people just have to tell secrets in an effort to prove they know more than others.
I Have to say with absolute honesty that I really do appreciate what you posted that I quoted. There is an old saying that for two people to keep a secret one of them has to be dead.
Basic human nature, psychology 101 dictates that people just have to impress others. Desperation to be relevant, if not superior to others is why people just have to tell secrets in an effort to prove they know more than others.
Thank you and please, do keep posting...
There are hundreds of thousands of crimes in which many people know who did them. The fact that they are unsolved directly disproves your theory.
I am an Irishman. People of my race have, in the past 50 years, blown up billions of dollars worth of buildings. Nobody has said a word about who did that.
Do you seriously think someone is going to admit to some role in 911 to "...impress others". Or that such an admission would be made to feel "superior".
0
Quote Originally Posted by Randisist:
I Have to say with absolute honesty that I really do appreciate what you posted that I quoted. There is an old saying that for two people to keep a secret one of them has to be dead.
Basic human nature, psychology 101 dictates that people just have to impress others. Desperation to be relevant, if not superior to others is why people just have to tell secrets in an effort to prove they know more than others.
Thank you and please, do keep posting...
There are hundreds of thousands of crimes in which many people know who did them. The fact that they are unsolved directly disproves your theory.
I am an Irishman. People of my race have, in the past 50 years, blown up billions of dollars worth of buildings. Nobody has said a word about who did that.
Do you seriously think someone is going to admit to some role in 911 to "...impress others". Or that such an admission would be made to feel "superior".
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
nist and their report
Hot Forum Topics
