There was no accident, no physical damage and no injury.
It is ALLEGED one driver was under the influence. Unless she was tested and then convicted, she is innocent.
The other driver was acting aggressively and conversing belligerently. How do we know this driver was not under the influence as well?
F--U--C--K the police. Don't tell the police S--H--I--T.
Because the system IS F--U--C--K--E--D up.
As far as the money goes, you went out of your way and deserve to be compensated. You didn't say, "I'm not getting involved" like 90% of the population would have responded.
YOU DID THE RIGHT THING.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
The bottom line is NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED.
There was no accident, no physical damage and no injury.
It is ALLEGED one driver was under the influence. Unless she was tested and then convicted, she is innocent.
The other driver was acting aggressively and conversing belligerently. How do we know this driver was not under the influence as well?
F--U--C--K the police. Don't tell the police S--H--I--T.
Because the system IS F--U--C--K--E--D up.
As far as the money goes, you went out of your way and deserve to be compensated. You didn't say, "I'm not getting involved" like 90% of the population would have responded.
There was no accident, no physical damage and no injury.
It is ALLEGED one driver was under the influence. Unless she was tested and then convicted, she is innocent.
The other driver was acting aggressively and conversing belligerently. How do we know this driver was not under the influence as well?
F--U--C--K the police. Don't tell the police S--H--I--T.
Because the system IS F--U--C--K--E--D up.
As far as the money goes, you went out of your way and deserve to be compensated. You didn't say, "I'm not getting involved" like 90% of the population would have responded.
YOU DID THE RIGHT THING.
Bullchit buddy.He said she was drunk, and if she was not why did she not just drive herself home.My point is this, he should not got involved, or he should have done as he said he would.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
The bottom line is NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED.
There was no accident, no physical damage and no injury.
It is ALLEGED one driver was under the influence. Unless she was tested and then convicted, she is innocent.
The other driver was acting aggressively and conversing belligerently. How do we know this driver was not under the influence as well?
F--U--C--K the police. Don't tell the police S--H--I--T.
Because the system IS F--U--C--K--E--D up.
As far as the money goes, you went out of your way and deserve to be compensated. You didn't say, "I'm not getting involved" like 90% of the population would have responded.
YOU DID THE RIGHT THING.
Bullchit buddy.He said she was drunk, and if she was not why did she not just drive herself home.My point is this, he should not got involved, or he should have done as he said he would.
This is the typical mindset of the average middle-class white male bigot.
The white women IS DRUNK, admitted it and paid a bribe to not get reported. This is undeniable.
But the BLACK lady...Now SHE'S THE SHADY ONE and she MUST have drugs on her to boot (even though she's in a rage because she was almost killed and there is no proof of either).
Perhaps you should take up law enforcement astros148 because many cops assume the same thing with Black drivers ALL THE TIME. It's called, "Driving while Black", but you wouldn't know anything about that.
(P.S. I may have misconstrued some of the details from this story because of the largely incomprehensible OP).
I agree the original post was hard to understand but where did the OP point out he was white, or what class he was? Or are you just assuming?
The hardest part about a 2 week war is the first 4 years
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
AND THERE IT IS.
This is the typical mindset of the average middle-class white male bigot.
The white women IS DRUNK, admitted it and paid a bribe to not get reported. This is undeniable.
But the BLACK lady...Now SHE'S THE SHADY ONE and she MUST have drugs on her to boot (even though she's in a rage because she was almost killed and there is no proof of either).
Perhaps you should take up law enforcement astros148 because many cops assume the same thing with Black drivers ALL THE TIME. It's called, "Driving while Black", but you wouldn't know anything about that.
(P.S. I may have misconstrued some of the details from this story because of the largely incomprehensible OP).
I agree the original post was hard to understand but where did the OP point out he was white, or what class he was? Or are you just assuming?
I am very surprised with the majority of responses so, not sure hw anyone could think not reporting this was right chioce. Funny how if the person almost getting tboned isnt related to you or friend of yours it is no harm no foul.
The hardest part about a 2 week war is the first 4 years
0
I am very surprised with the majority of responses so, not sure hw anyone could think not reporting this was right chioce. Funny how if the person almost getting tboned isnt related to you or friend of yours it is no harm no foul.
I am very surprised with the majority of responses so, not sure hw anyone could think not reporting this was right chioce. Funny how if the person almost getting tboned isnt related to you or friend of yours it is no harm no foul.
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
I am very surprised with the majority of responses so, not sure hw anyone could think not reporting this was right chioce. Funny how if the person almost getting tboned isnt related to you or friend of yours it is no harm no foul.
Damn, I wish this would happen to me...fck the money. If she was attractive like you say, why in the living hell didn't you take advantage of her situation and get a sexual favor? Awesome opportunity just wasted.
0
Damn, I wish this would happen to me...fck the money. If she was attractive like you say, why in the living hell didn't you take advantage of her situation and get a sexual favor? Awesome opportunity just wasted.
If she was drunk driving, as a guy just wanting to help but not see her put through the wringer, I'm OK with you taking her home however, as a productive member of society you should have explained to her that you're not like most people. Most people would have called the cops.
Then, when she got out you should have kicked her in her dumb box to insure she remembers.
PS, OP, don't ever take up writing as a profession.
0
If she was drunk driving, as a guy just wanting to help but not see her put through the wringer, I'm OK with you taking her home however, as a productive member of society you should have explained to her that you're not like most people. Most people would have called the cops.
Then, when she got out you should have kicked her in her dumb box to insure she remembers.
PS, OP, don't ever take up writing as a profession.
1980's or 2012... Take the money and don't tell the police anything.
ALWAYS take the money.
NEVER talk to the police.
F*uck the Police. Most police are corrupt, so chances are if you would have called the poliice, they would have probably taken the bribe, plus a blowjob
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
1980's or 2012... Take the money and don't tell the police anything.
ALWAYS take the money.
NEVER talk to the police.
F*uck the Police. Most police are corrupt, so chances are if you would have called the poliice, they would have probably taken the bribe, plus a blowjob
Are some of you high? This guy has no right to make this gal sit in her car and wait while he calls the cops. She could tell him to F off and just drive away. What's he going to do, physically tie her down. And what is he going to tell the cops.....that he thinks someone might be drunk and had been driving?
Cops can't do person unless they observe a behavior which makes them suspicious. They can't to on the observations from some schmuck off the street.
It's amazing how ignorant so many are when it comes to the law.
Bottom line is, he got the gal off the road and that's about the best he could do.
0
Are some of you high? This guy has no right to make this gal sit in her car and wait while he calls the cops. She could tell him to F off and just drive away. What's he going to do, physically tie her down. And what is he going to tell the cops.....that he thinks someone might be drunk and had been driving?
Cops can't do person unless they observe a behavior which makes them suspicious. They can't to on the observations from some schmuck off the street.
It's amazing how ignorant so many are when it comes to the law.
Bottom line is, he got the gal off the road and that's about the best he could do.
I would be pissed off if some lady left reporting this to the police on my plate. lazy girl had to get to the hospital, lol that's bullshit. If she wants to report it, then she should report it herself.
0
I would be pissed off if some lady left reporting this to the police on my plate. lazy girl had to get to the hospital, lol that's bullshit. If she wants to report it, then she should report it herself.
Are some of you high? This guy has no right to make this gal sit in her car and wait while he calls the cops. She could tell him to F off and just drive away. What's he going to do, physically tie her down. And what is he going to tell the cops.....that he thinks someone might be drunk and had been driving?
Cops can't do person unless they observe a behavior which makes them suspicious. They can't to on the observations from some schmuck off the street.
It's amazing how ignorant so many are when it comes to the law.
Bottom line is, he got the gal off the road and that's about the best he could do.
So if you are in a situation where you feel a person is drunk and almost cause a accident and are there you feel that by taking them home you have done as much as you could?
The hardest part about a 2 week war is the first 4 years
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
Are some of you high? This guy has no right to make this gal sit in her car and wait while he calls the cops. She could tell him to F off and just drive away. What's he going to do, physically tie her down. And what is he going to tell the cops.....that he thinks someone might be drunk and had been driving?
Cops can't do person unless they observe a behavior which makes them suspicious. They can't to on the observations from some schmuck off the street.
It's amazing how ignorant so many are when it comes to the law.
Bottom line is, he got the gal off the road and that's about the best he could do.
So if you are in a situation where you feel a person is drunk and almost cause a accident and are there you feel that by taking them home you have done as much as you could?
1980's or 2012... Take the money and don't tell the police anything.
ALWAYS take the money.
NEVER talk to the police.
Yeah this is really debatable...
In terms of Money...its up to you to take it and do what you want with it either good or bad.
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
F*uck the Police. Most police are corrupt, so chances are if you would have called the poliice, they would have probably taken the bribe, plus a blowjob
Talking to the Police? I mean c'mon everyone on here says darn THE COPS bc we all gamble and do garbage but who are you gonna call when you need help huh? what if you get robbed? or something shady happens?
you're gonna call the COPS for help.
saying darn the cops is immature
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
1980's or 2012... Take the money and don't tell the police anything.
ALWAYS take the money.
NEVER talk to the police.
Yeah this is really debatable...
In terms of Money...its up to you to take it and do what you want with it either good or bad.
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
F*uck the Police. Most police are corrupt, so chances are if you would have called the poliice, they would have probably taken the bribe, plus a blowjob
Talking to the Police? I mean c'mon everyone on here says darn THE COPS bc we all gamble and do garbage but who are you gonna call when you need help huh? what if you get robbed? or something shady happens?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.