Jane Doe, a native of Green Bay, WI, reportedly turned in $20 to a convenience store when she inadvertently received too much change back from the clerk.
Jane had stopped by the store to purchase beer, chewing tobacco, and a some Packer condoms. She paid the clerk with a $100 bill. She was so excited to try out the Packer condoms that she just shoved the change into her fanny pack and ran out of the store. Later on, after she and her boyfriend finished having sex, she went back into the fanny pack to grab a chew. It was then that she noticed the store clerk had given her $20 too much in change for her transaction. She then went back to the convenience store and gave the $20 back to the clerk.
"I'm a Packer fan," Jane said, "It was the right thing to do. What would it say about us if I just decided to keep the $20? I could have never gone round two with my boyfriend....I would have been too distracted. I had never seen a $100 bill and I was so excited to try out my Packer condoms, I just spaced it."
Authorities in Green Bay are currently discussing a parade in honor of Jane Doe's honesty. Other people close to Lambeau field are said to be considering erecting a statue in the hall of fame section.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
You don't see this type of thing every day.
Jane Doe, a native of Green Bay, WI, reportedly turned in $20 to a convenience store when she inadvertently received too much change back from the clerk.
Jane had stopped by the store to purchase beer, chewing tobacco, and a some Packer condoms. She paid the clerk with a $100 bill. She was so excited to try out the Packer condoms that she just shoved the change into her fanny pack and ran out of the store. Later on, after she and her boyfriend finished having sex, she went back into the fanny pack to grab a chew. It was then that she noticed the store clerk had given her $20 too much in change for her transaction. She then went back to the convenience store and gave the $20 back to the clerk.
"I'm a Packer fan," Jane said, "It was the right thing to do. What would it say about us if I just decided to keep the $20? I could have never gone round two with my boyfriend....I would have been too distracted. I had never seen a $100 bill and I was so excited to try out my Packer condoms, I just spaced it."
Authorities in Green Bay are currently discussing a parade in honor of Jane Doe's honesty. Other people close to Lambeau field are said to be considering erecting a statue in the hall of fame section.
Jane Doe, a native of Green Bay, WI, reportedly turned in $20 to a convenience store when she inadvertently received too much change back from the clerk.
Jane had stopped by the store to purchase beer, chewing tobacco, and a some Packer condoms. She paid the clerk with a $100 bill. She was so excited to try out the Packer condoms that she just shoved the change into her fanny pack and ran out of the store. Later on, after she and her boyfriend finished having sex, she went back into the fanny pack to grab a chew. It was then that she noticed the store clerk had given her $20 too much in change for her transaction. She then went back to the convenience store and gave the $20 back to the clerk.
"I'm a Packer fan," Jane said, "It was the right thing to do. What would it say about us if I just decided to keep the $20? I could have never gone round two with my boyfriend....I would have been too distracted. I had never seen a $100 bill and I was so excited to try out my Packer condoms, I just spaced it."
Authorities in Green Bay are currently discussing a parade in honor of Jane Doe's honesty. Other people close to Lambeau field are said to be considering erecting a statue in the hall of fame section.
way to go Atheists
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
You don't see this type of thing every day.
Jane Doe, a native of Green Bay, WI, reportedly turned in $20 to a convenience store when she inadvertently received too much change back from the clerk.
Jane had stopped by the store to purchase beer, chewing tobacco, and a some Packer condoms. She paid the clerk with a $100 bill. She was so excited to try out the Packer condoms that she just shoved the change into her fanny pack and ran out of the store. Later on, after she and her boyfriend finished having sex, she went back into the fanny pack to grab a chew. It was then that she noticed the store clerk had given her $20 too much in change for her transaction. She then went back to the convenience store and gave the $20 back to the clerk.
"I'm a Packer fan," Jane said, "It was the right thing to do. What would it say about us if I just decided to keep the $20? I could have never gone round two with my boyfriend....I would have been too distracted. I had never seen a $100 bill and I was so excited to try out my Packer condoms, I just spaced it."
Authorities in Green Bay are currently discussing a parade in honor of Jane Doe's honesty. Other people close to Lambeau field are said to be considering erecting a statue in the hall of fame section.
Fine, I get the point. But let's face it. When a Christian does something bad, he's immediately identified as a bad Christian. When a non-Christian does something bad, there is never any mention of religious affiliation whatsoever. I guess Christians are held to higher standards, and I suppose that's alright. We should be.
0
Fine, I get the point. But let's face it. When a Christian does something bad, he's immediately identified as a bad Christian. When a non-Christian does something bad, there is never any mention of religious affiliation whatsoever. I guess Christians are held to higher standards, and I suppose that's alright. We should be.
Your title of the thread is self defeating.........
"Good" might be "objective" under Christianity, but doesn't that go out the window when God forgives those who are repentant?
A murderer who finds God before he is executed. Murder....bad by all accounts (not just by Christians), but this guy is saved because he is repentant and believes in God.
The fact that murder is "bad" under the umbrella of Christianity means absolutely nothing to this person.
You can define all the things you want.....what matters is what that actually means.
"We have a set of "good" rules you should live by. However, if you don't live by those rules but believe in God and repent, you're good to go."
Really?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
What is the definition of "good" under Atheism?
Isnt good and bad subjective under Atheism?
Your title of the thread is self defeating.........
"Good" might be "objective" under Christianity, but doesn't that go out the window when God forgives those who are repentant?
A murderer who finds God before he is executed. Murder....bad by all accounts (not just by Christians), but this guy is saved because he is repentant and believes in God.
The fact that murder is "bad" under the umbrella of Christianity means absolutely nothing to this person.
You can define all the things you want.....what matters is what that actually means.
"We have a set of "good" rules you should live by. However, if you don't live by those rules but believe in God and repent, you're good to go."
I don't know if I should share this or if this is relevant to the topic. I'll just hang this out there. My boss is Catholic and often voices his opinion regarding the christian life. Which is fine, but I've noticed it's conditional to the circumstance. Example, he's very nice ...sometimes, but as soon as it heats up in the office (in terms of work pressure) he's a complete jerk. So treat people nice when everything is nice and calm but when life hits you with minor road blocks go ahead and turn into a prick? If I were not his employee, I'd remind him of his double standard ... but it's not worth losing my job!!!
0
I don't know if I should share this or if this is relevant to the topic. I'll just hang this out there. My boss is Catholic and often voices his opinion regarding the christian life. Which is fine, but I've noticed it's conditional to the circumstance. Example, he's very nice ...sometimes, but as soon as it heats up in the office (in terms of work pressure) he's a complete jerk. So treat people nice when everything is nice and calm but when life hits you with minor road blocks go ahead and turn into a prick? If I were not his employee, I'd remind him of his double standard ... but it's not worth losing my job!!!
Well, no it isn't, and the article you linked to made clear it isn't.
CBN spokesman Chris Roslan wrote in a statement that Robertson’s “intent was not to condone infidelity or to cast blame. We regret any misunderstanding."
Again, typical tactic for the left.
0
Seems like adultery is ok as well now.
Well, no it isn't, and the article you linked to made clear it isn't.
CBN spokesman Chris Roslan wrote in a statement that Robertson’s “intent was not to condone infidelity or to cast blame. We regret any misunderstanding."
Well, no it isn't, and the article you linked to made clear it isn't.
CBN spokesman Chris Roslan wrote in a statement that Robertson’s “intent was not to condone infidelity or to cast blame. We regret any misunderstanding."
Watch it for yourself. Robertson excuses adultery like it's no big deal. As long as the guy provides a home, food, clothes, etc he has free reign to do whatever he wants because...hey....men wander.
Blame it on porn and strippers if you want to, just don't blame it on him.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Seems like adultery is ok as well now.
Well, no it isn't, and the article you linked to made clear it isn't.
CBN spokesman Chris Roslan wrote in a statement that Robertson’s “intent was not to condone infidelity or to cast blame. We regret any misunderstanding."
Watch it for yourself. Robertson excuses adultery like it's no big deal. As long as the guy provides a home, food, clothes, etc he has free reign to do whatever he wants because...hey....men wander.
Blame it on porn and strippers if you want to, just don't blame it on him.
So since we have 1 example, how does 1 example of an obviously disturbed individual represent "Christianity"?
Are they not stating their views in defense of Christianity? They may not speak for Christians everywhere but their view point is in defense of the good book.
I would never take the viewpoint that Rudolph speaks for 14daroad or any other Christian. However, I am not so sure many Christians would condemn his actions.
What's your take on Rudolph and his actions?
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Ok, I missed that one.
So since we have 1 example, how does 1 example of an obviously disturbed individual represent "Christianity"?
Are they not stating their views in defense of Christianity? They may not speak for Christians everywhere but their view point is in defense of the good book.
I would never take the viewpoint that Rudolph speaks for 14daroad or any other Christian. However, I am not so sure many Christians would condemn his actions.
Well, people say a lot of nutty things in defense of something.
I can't tell if that guy views himself as a Christian or person. He rambles so much (he says he's not a fervent Christian) I can't exactly understand what he actually wants.
So I don't know if he is using Christianity as a defense or what.
I don't think Rudolph is acting in accordance with what Jesus taught. Judgement for abortionists is coming, but it shouldn't be from people like Rudolph.
0
Well, people say a lot of nutty things in defense of something.
I can't tell if that guy views himself as a Christian or person. He rambles so much (he says he's not a fervent Christian) I can't exactly understand what he actually wants.
So I don't know if he is using Christianity as a defense or what.
I don't think Rudolph is acting in accordance with what Jesus taught. Judgement for abortionists is coming, but it shouldn't be from people like Rudolph.
Well, people say a lot of nutty things in defense of something.
I can't tell if that guy views himself as a Christian or person. He rambles so much (he says he's not a fervent Christian) I can't exactly understand what he actually wants.
So I don't know if he is using Christianity as a defense or what.
I don't think Rudolph is acting in accordance with what Jesus taught. Judgement for abortionists is coming, but it shouldn't be from people like Rudolph.
While I don't believe in a judgement day right now, if I did I would share this sentiment.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Well, people say a lot of nutty things in defense of something.
I can't tell if that guy views himself as a Christian or person. He rambles so much (he says he's not a fervent Christian) I can't exactly understand what he actually wants.
So I don't know if he is using Christianity as a defense or what.
I don't think Rudolph is acting in accordance with what Jesus taught. Judgement for abortionists is coming, but it shouldn't be from people like Rudolph.
While I don't believe in a judgement day right now, if I did I would share this sentiment.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.