Yeah I'm embarassing myself when half the forum agrees with my point of view and only about 3 agree with yours.
Typing in the phrase "keep embarssing yourself" only applies when another person is acting foolish.
My point of view is not foolish and if you think it is please point it out to me
You are the one taking personal shots bro, saying I don't know this and that.
We just have to agree to disagree. I'm not a law student and never said I was, but the fact of the matter is people have been convicted with way less evidence and she should be locked up for the rest of her life. Do you want to argue that?
I can agree with that, and I'm not here to argue over the justice system but the phrase reasonable doubt it a joke.
Seriously, anything other than the judge and jury witnessing the murder I could bring a case against the phrase reasonable doubt.
I can agree with that, and I'm not here to argue over the justice system but the phrase reasonable doubt it a joke.
Seriously, anything other than the judge and jury witnessing the murder I could bring a case against the phrase reasonable doubt.
Whatever judicial system that is going to convict Amanda Knox for murder. It is wayyyyy less obvious that she is guilty, but she will be convicted because thats what SHOULD happen when you kill someone, especially a child
Dude I have been internet arguing all day and I'm emotionally drained.
I don't think any judicial system is fair. I think money and skin color can and will affect the outcome of any given trail.
You throw in the phrase reasonable doubt and that opens up a whole new can of worms.
My final thought is this lady should spend the rest of her life in jail and IF there is a heaven and hell, we all know where she is going.
No mother in their right mind would leave their kid with a stranger.
I say stranger because none of Caseys family or friends knew this lady.
Even if she did have nothing to do with it, her child died and she is suppose to take care of her. Even if she had nothing to do with it she should still be charged with neglect homicide or whatever.
The fact that she prolly did do it, and was charged with nothing is an injustice.
No mother in their right mind would leave their kid with a stranger.
I say stranger because none of Caseys family or friends knew this lady.
Even if she did have nothing to do with it, her child died and she is suppose to take care of her. Even if she had nothing to do with it she should still be charged with neglect homicide or whatever.
The fact that she prolly did do it, and was charged with nothing is an injustice.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
"It's not what you know, it's about what you can? prove."
Alonzo Harris, 'Training Day'