All Forums | College Football

Southern California at Oregon (10/27/2007)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3085
Posts: 95
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #51
Ok, now you're making sense.  But easy calling everybody WAC teams.  I have more or less been with you the whole time, but carefull overlooking that Oregon offense.  I don't see that as a play that the pros are making.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by Fill_Night:

Didn't think what?  I know you haven't been betting your mortgage on your boy Pete.  There are very few people that could have bet their mortgage on USC this year.  Save your....oops, I mean YOU'RE...hyperbole for someone else!  YOU ARE NOT BETTING YOUR MORTGAGE ON USC!  You can sit in front of your computer all you want and pretend that you are making great plays.  Go ahead and bet your mortgage.  I know people at public housing that can help you.
YOUR LOSS PAL.Take those parleys man and make you some money.Stop betting college football man....its not your thing.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #53
Wow, big talk from someone that is relying on Rutgers to make their weekend.  You really think the Easy East is that much better than the WAC or wac mac...whatever you call them?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by Fill_Night:

Didn't think what?  I know you haven't been betting your mortgage on your boy Pete.  There are very few people that could have bet their mortgage on USC this year.  Save your....oops, I mean YOU'RE...hyperbole for someone else!  YOU ARE NOT BETTING YOUR MORTGAGE ON USC!  You can sit in front of your computer all you want and pretend that you are making great plays.  Go ahead and bet your mortgage.  I know people at public housing that can help you.

The proof is in the pudding pal.

Virginia Tech+3

Rutgers+6

So.Cal+3

1000=6000

Comeback after you see the scoreboard HUSTLER.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by Fill_Night:

Fine, give me the Vols giving 3 against Spurrier....unless you aren't the gambler chief.
ou see those two teams last week?Only idiot jumps int fire twice.Let them proof they get back on track.....in the mean time find better percentages and advantages.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by Fill_Night:

Wow, big talk from someone that is relying on Rutgers to make their weekend.  You really think the Easy East is that much better than the WAC or wac mac...whatever you call them?
This is not that Rutgers team.....you really should catch-up on your college football my friend.Very easy....on this very site you can go to players returning,last few years and you'll get a lot answered.It called PUT IN THE WORK!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by morgan102:

PLEASE!!!
sweetness read my post again before you quote it and say PLEASE would you? also you might hurt feelings around here in cyber land with your all caps response ( its just like yelling) or so i am told. and yes danstyk the last 2 time sc has been a dog, michigan, blowout, and oklahoma as i said in an earlier post blowout! dont bet against pete carroll in a big game. especially as a dog
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 10
Posted: #58
That's right!  Only bet against Pete when USC is playing the two worst teams in the conference from the previous season. 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 210
Posted: #59
The heart says Oregon, but the head says USC. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by saberjake:

sweetness read my post again before you quote it and say PLEASE would you? also you might hurt feelings around here in cyber land with your all caps response ( its just like yelling) or so i am told. and yes danstyk the last 2 time sc has been a dog, michigan, blowout, and oklahoma as i said in an earlier post blowout! dont bet against pete carroll in a big game. especially as a dog
What are you the cyber land POLICE!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by morgan102:

What are you the cyber land POLICE!!
you clearly dont take the time to read the thread. just what others are saying about you huh? please for you sake get a little more informed. otherwise it just litters up the thread with nonsense. you attempted to call me out but didnt even realize we are on the same side of the game...but i am probably just wasting my time youll just respond tp this post and attempt to insult me and we could go on and on but, i have said all i need to say on this game and to people who think they are smarter than everyone else. good luck to you morgan102.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by saberjake:

you clearly dont take the time to read the thread. just what others are saying about you huh? please for you sake get a little more informed. otherwise it just litters up the thread with nonsense. you attempted to call me out but didnt even realize we are on the same side of the game...but i am probably just wasting my time youll just respond tp this post and attempt to insult me and we could go on and on but, i have said all i need to say on this game and to people who think they are smarter than everyone else. good luck to you morgan102.
CHECK BACK SATURDAY AFTER YOU READ THE SCOREBOARD OFFICER.WHERE WERE YOU BORN,SNOBHILL.

VIRGINIA TECH+3

RUTGERS+6

SO.CAL+3

We'll see who's the real deal.Go head answer this....that means im getting under your skin.You lose....I WIN.Place a dime on those 3 parley's.Make yourself some money$$$$.Say hello to all on Snobhill.OUT!!!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by saberjake:

you clearly dont take the time to read the thread. just what others are saying about you huh? please for you sake get a little more informed. otherwise it just litters up the thread with nonsense. you attempted to call me out but didnt even realize we are on the same side of the game...but i am probably just wasting my time youll just respond tp this post and attempt to insult me and we could go on and on but, i have said all i need to say on this game and to people who think they are smarter than everyone else. good luck to you morgan102.
ADD:I DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT YOU ARE ANYONE ELSE IS SAYING ABOUT ME.IM NOT HERE TO MAKE FRIENDS.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 248
Posted: #64
Saber, you can't possibly be comparing the USC from the past three years to this years group.  They were underdogs in those two games but those teams and this team are like night and day.  In past years, USC has had this little thing called TALENT.  They don't have it this year.  And after the Stanford game, teams stopped being scared of them.  They can't win games on reputation alone anymore.  Oregon might have lost to Cal at home, but Cal is better than USC.  I will admit, USC's defense has been nasty to start the year, but who have they played.  Are you going to count that Nebraska game as a quality win?  Oregon has a lot of upperclassmen that have been waiting for this game since they blew that 13 point lead two years ago.  If this years Trojans fall behind by 13, you might want to find a second half line and try to hedge your bet.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 175
Posted: #65
Let's see...How many games has USC won against teams with a winning record (as of today)?
 
That would be zero. No wonder their stats look so good. They even lost to a team with a losing record. They're living a lie in L.A.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 6898
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by rickmatthews:

Hmmm.  Are you describing my question as traveling in a delineated passage way or were you trying to use lane as an adjective?

Maybe a verb.  As in "How many points you lane on dat fave" or "How fat is dat chick you lane da pipe to"

Lots and lots of Oregon praise on da telly,  damn good mo for the trojan D...hmmm

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 78
Posted: #67
USC wins easy 30 - 14!!!! GO TROJANS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by StRuggles:

Saber, you can't possibly be comparing the USC from the past three years to this years group.  They were underdogs in those two games but those teams and this team are like night and day.  In past years, USC has had this little thing called TALENT.  They don't have it this year.  And after the Stanford game, teams stopped being scared of them.  They can't win games on reputation alone anymore.  Oregon might have lost to Cal at home, but Cal is better than USC.  I will admit, USC's defense has been nasty to start the year, but who have they played.  Are you going to count that Nebraska game as a quality win?  Oregon has a lot of upperclassmen that have been waiting for this game since they blew that 13 point lead two years ago.  If this years Trojans fall behind by 13, you might want to find a second half line and try to hedge your bet.
your forgetting one thing my friend, this defense that has been nasty has been ravaged by injuries all year and is finally healthy. cushing is back, maluga is close to 100 percent the secondary is healthy. the injury bug bit HARD this year and they are finally hitting there stride. like all trojan teams do this time of year. you can't be serious in saying this team has no talent. i will be the first to admit the recievers are green but hazelton is coming along right on time, fred davis is the best t.e. in the nation look up his numbers, when joe mcknight finally has "that" game look out. you cant compare this team to last years?????? how do you figure? the whole danm defense is last years team! granted jarrett and smith are gone , but like i said with davis, hazelton and a MOBILE qb in sanchez i LOVE there chances. do what you have to but, bet the ducks and lose, they always choke...its  what they do.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #69
and another thing CAL IS BETTER THAN SC?????????? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!we shall see in a few weeks wont we? good luck sat.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #70
one more thing bro... DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS... they didnt just make that shit up... dont put your money on and dog and pony show that scores points on bad defenses...yes  cal has a BAD defense...pat cowan has a torn mcl and a bad wheel and ran whenever he needed to...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by StRuggles:

Saber, you can't possibly be comparing the USC from the past three years to this years group.  They were underdogs in those two games but those teams and this team are like night and day.  In past years, USC has had this little thing called TALENT.  They don't have it this year.  And after the Stanford game, teams stopped being scared of them.  They can't win games on reputation alone anymore.  Oregon might have lost to Cal at home, but Cal is better than USC.  I will admit, USC's defense has been nasty to start the year, but who have they played.  Are you going to count that Nebraska game as a quality win?  Oregon has a lot of upperclassmen that have been waiting for this game since they blew that 13 point lead two years ago.  If this years Trojans fall behind by 13, you might want to find a second half line and try to hedge your bet.
Another thing, so what exactly happened to those angry upperclassmen in last years game when they lost 35-10???? thats not a valid point. what they werent angry last year but they wanna avenge 2 years ago now???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 248
Posted: #72
I'm not saying that they didn't want it last year, but last year they were completely overmatched.  Not only did USC have Jarrett and Smith, but Oregon was in the middle of a QB war between Dixon and Brady Leaf, and they were on the road.  Last year, Oregon was just waiting to self destruct.  They had no confidence, no direction, and no chance against a stacked USC offense.  That offense is gone.  Oregon is pumped because they finally have a weak USC team coming into Autzen and the Ducks know they can win this game. 
 
And yes, I am serious when I say USC doesn't have talent.  I'll give you Davis.  He is a beast at TE and he is going to have a nice career at the next level, but your gamebreaker can't be a TE.  Hazelton is average, Sanchez is sloppy, and the USC secondary is going to get eaten up.  Yes, the same secondary that couldn't stop Stanford's backup QB from converting a 4th and 20 and a 4th and goal from the 6.  Yes, that same defense that you want to win a championship with.  Stop watiing for McKnight to have "that" game, because it ain't coming soon.  If you want, I will buy you tickets to the Holiday Bowl and we can talk about how "great" USC is while we watch them play Navy.  Sound good.   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 248
Posted: #73
And another thing.  Cal is better than USC.  It is gonna get ugly in a few weeks. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3544
Posted: #74
can go on all day like this...all that is left to say is Saturday we will see who is right... Ask pat cowan how good cal is...or oregon state...somebody sounds like they are a bears fan to me...
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 746
Posted: #75
Sorry Saber- CAL is better than USC. Don't get all excited because your boys beat up on ND dude. Let's review.......
 
10/06/07 STAN L 23-24 L -39 U 57
10/13/07 ARZ W 20-13 L -21 U 55.5
10/20/07 @NOTRE W 38-0 W -16.5 U 44.5
 
That's not good Brother. They barely beat AZ. They're 11 points from being 3-4 against weak teams. The Ducks will win this game because they are #1 At Home #2 Will tear up the the secondary #3 Revenge factor #4 they're just better this year. They may wind up 7-5.
 
Don't fret though Bro. I have 4 seats 2nd row at the 30 yard line  for the Emerald Bowl (Dec 28, PacBell Park) for the #4 ranked Pac-10 team with an ACC opponent. My 4 seats are in the Club but I'll make you a deal on those.
 
Morgan- If your not here to make friends, you're doing a fine job.
 
Betting on USC this year is like $hitting away your money but not as satisfying.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.