its funny how some of these people think vegas just give out free money. just like the previous thursday when byu lost to tcu. i dont know whos giving out money but i know it aint vegas. ruts ftw
0
its funny how some of these people think vegas just give out free money. just like the previous thursday when byu lost to tcu. i dont know whos giving out money but i know it aint vegas. ruts ftw
Tough game to pick but if UCONN can get points I have to like the team who can run the ball. The injuries do scare me.
Under is a nice play, both teams are going to try and run the ball and control the LOS with either having much confidence. I hope non of these QBs throw any pics to the house.
0
Tough game to pick but if UCONN can get points I have to like the team who can run the ball. The injuries do scare me.
Under is a nice play, both teams are going to try and run the ball and control the LOS with either having much confidence. I hope non of these QBs throw any pics to the house.
I dont think its dat easy heavygunner, if Uconn were so much better, then the line would have been like 7 or more, but according to the spread something is wrong with Uconn and we'll find out what is after the game.
Tell you what it is UConn is w/o their starting qb, and got hammered in the game he didnt play. Rutgers is bad this year, question is, will conn make like an UNC and win with thier backup?
Looks like a wait and see game for me, BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by mnguyen23:
I dont think its dat easy heavygunner, if Uconn were so much better, then the line would have been like 7 or more, but according to the spread something is wrong with Uconn and we'll find out what is after the game.
Tell you what it is UConn is w/o their starting qb, and got hammered in the game he didnt play. Rutgers is bad this year, question is, will conn make like an UNC and win with thier backup?
Rutgers -2 plain and simple. Lots of value here fading the public who will continue to love on Uconn with the line moving in favor of Rutgers. Rutgers is the play here and they will cover today. One of my larger plays.
0
Rutgers -2 plain and simple. Lots of value here fading the public who will continue to love on Uconn with the line moving in favor of Rutgers. Rutgers is the play here and they will cover today. One of my larger plays.
I can't believe how many people will blindly take a side just because of the line. It is true that vegas doesn't "give money away", but it is also true that vegas doesn't always get the lines right. Look at all of the huge upsets we've seen so far this year. The only thing vegas gives a shit about is having equal money on both sides so they can split even and keep the juice. As a matter of fact, vegas doesn't give a shit who wins or covers as long as the wagers on both sides balance out. So, what does that low line tell you? It tells me that vegas expected to have a lot of people betting rutgers and adjusted the line accordingly to get people on the uconn side. Does that mean that uconn won't cover? No. It means that vegas expected a lot of people, for good reason or not, to expect rutgers to cover. If the line had been uconn -7, which is more realistic, rutgers would have been pounded into the ground. So in vegas fashion, they make rutgers backers eat some points to get some people on the other side. The only publicly available information on this game that I've found which would draw people to rutgers is that Lorenzen is out and Frazer didn't look good against UNC. Well, if I remember correctly, Rutgers just got blasted by UNC a few weeks ago and with their starting qb. Frazer has now had another week to work out with the first team and will likely play much better this week. Can the same be said for Teel? Nope, he just sucks. Best advice I can give for betting ncaa fb is don't overcomplicate things. NCAA doesn't have the parity that NFL has. If one team is better than the other then more often than not that team will win. This low line is a gift, but only if you are on the right side.
0
I can't believe how many people will blindly take a side just because of the line. It is true that vegas doesn't "give money away", but it is also true that vegas doesn't always get the lines right. Look at all of the huge upsets we've seen so far this year. The only thing vegas gives a shit about is having equal money on both sides so they can split even and keep the juice. As a matter of fact, vegas doesn't give a shit who wins or covers as long as the wagers on both sides balance out. So, what does that low line tell you? It tells me that vegas expected to have a lot of people betting rutgers and adjusted the line accordingly to get people on the uconn side. Does that mean that uconn won't cover? No. It means that vegas expected a lot of people, for good reason or not, to expect rutgers to cover. If the line had been uconn -7, which is more realistic, rutgers would have been pounded into the ground. So in vegas fashion, they make rutgers backers eat some points to get some people on the other side. The only publicly available information on this game that I've found which would draw people to rutgers is that Lorenzen is out and Frazer didn't look good against UNC. Well, if I remember correctly, Rutgers just got blasted by UNC a few weeks ago and with their starting qb. Frazer has now had another week to work out with the first team and will likely play much better this week. Can the same be said for Teel? Nope, he just sucks. Best advice I can give for betting ncaa fb is don't overcomplicate things. NCAA doesn't have the parity that NFL has. If one team is better than the other then more often than not that team will win. This low line is a gift, but only if you are on the right side.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
vegas doesn't give away $. 
Hot Forum Topics
