All Forums | College Football

Ball State at Tulsa (01/06/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14099
Posts: 346
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #76
neverHitsbig, you're mistaken...the line is now Ball State +2.5...there was major line movement here.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #77
Yeah, I just rechecked BetEd at its Ball State +3.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 31
Posted: #78
Tulsa is the team here.  With the line moving like it is.  Its crazy how vegas knows these things all the time...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 42
Posted: #79
[Quote: Originally Posted by neverHitsbig]

Chad2322,

What are you talking about with the line movement? There has been zero line movement.  It has remained at ball state -2.5 despite the fact that 65% are on tulsa.  Typically the line shuld move closer to -1 or a pk but vegas wants to continue action on tulsa for a reason.  Vegas isant afraid of the action on Tulsa this tells me ill go with Ball state -2.5

Hit refresh - this game has done a flip flop

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22590
Posted: #80
i myself dont see either team stopping the other, hoping for a td frenzy here, i like nate davis and the over. gl
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 31
Posted: #81
[Quote: Originally Posted by W8LIFTER]
Ball State -2.5

look ball state was at -2.5 now its tusla -3 .. what are you talking about?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 117
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by neverHitsbig:

Chad2322,

What are you talking about with the line movement? There has been zero line movement.  It has remained at ball state -2.5 despite the fact that 65% are on tulsa.  Typically the line shuld move closer to -1 or a pk but vegas wants to continue action on tulsa for a reason.  Vegas isant afraid of the action on Tulsa this tells me ill go with Ball state -2.5

idiot you are sir, id love to be your local book! omg dude before you post anything every again, know what the fck you are talking about please!  these threads are for information!  you sir have none so go away

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 31
Posted: #83
thank you
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 117
Posted: #84
<------neverhitsbig bankroll omg, u probably had the vikings at home to sir
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1123
Posted: #85
 
I plan to use the "Vegas is always right" theory and go with the line movement favoring Tulsa!
 
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 8330
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by tagsrock:

i myself dont see either team stopping the other, hoping for a td frenzy here, i like nate davis and the over. gl

 I like that too but the weather is starting to hold me back a bit along with the Tues undergods

Good luck

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 8330
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by jdawg07:

wind steady at 10-15  shld stay that way all day....more to come
 

 thanks for the link.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 24
Posted: #88
Quote Originally Posted by chad2322:

idiot you are sir, id love to be your local book! omg dude before you post anything every again, know what the fck you are talking about please!  these threads are for information!  you sir have none so go away

Relax man...I wouldn't be talking if I was you anyway - Your RSI is complete crap

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 117
Posted: #89
bigdaddy i was wondering what happen to your tuesday under special, im actually gonna stay away from the total side. i think the last four games with this type of line movement says it all. 
GOOD LUCK TO YOU SIR, BUT if i was a gambling man..lol id go with under here,
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2072
Posted: #90
Yeah, with the weather being complete junk, isn't the UNDER a lock here? Can they really put up 74 points in bad weather?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 24
Posted: #91
I keep seeing references to "reverse line mvmt"...what am I missing?  From everything I've seen the public and "vegas"(sharps) are solidly on Tulsa.  The trend is that when "vegas"(sharps) disagree with the public, "vegas"(sharps) win....but thats not the case here so what gives? 
 
Also for the paranoid on here: sharps are sharps for a reason - THEY WIN!!!  So it should be no surprise they are right a lot - its not a vegas conspiracy!  If you can get a good read on which way the sharps are going, which can be difficult when the public action is heavy (like in bowl games), you have a better than avg shot at winning.
 
That being said, there is a ton of action on Tulsa...personally I'm spooked and probably won't play this one but if I can't find any BB to get my fix, I'm putting a tiny bit on Ball St....the total is weather dependent but leaning over if the coast is even semi-clear.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #92
Another key to this game is the status of Tulsa's top WR Brennan Marion who is listed as Doubtful but Covers.com as him listed as Questionable. Anyone know his actual status?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #93
I don't see the reverse line movement in this game...TULSA got a ton of public money when the line opened at +3.  Please open my eyes to this if I am missing something.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2954
Posted: #94
That Mac Champinoship was Lost bc of TO by Ball St. I notice people put they were exposed when you Have fumbles for TD What else can you do? I Seen a Tulsa Team get torched by Houston and then to loose to ECU makes me Question Tulsa. My upset special was +7 ARK vs Tulsa, it made no sense how a Conf Usa was even fav by a TD aginst a SEC team. Nate Davis is a Smarter QB and his Ground game helps him out alot which people dont notice. Lewis is a strong RB to take Down I give Ball st the edge here. I want to see stats on D for both teams....Let me know what you guys get.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 24
Posted: #95
I haven't seen such one-sided action on a game in a while...that doesn't scare anyone else?  Feels like a set-up to me.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 212
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by CollegeSharp:

I'll take the team with a more balanced attack and with less turnover problems.  Ball State.  Sharp 

Less turnover problems than their last game against Buffalo?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 13879
Posted: #97
Tulsa
Under
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 1600
Posted: #98
Ball State has a little bit of D in them.  They haven't had a "double over" (over in both halfs) all year.  That's ZERO as in NEVER HAPPENED.  And Tulsa had only two (Houston and New Mexico).
 
UNDER 1st half
if it doesn't hit,
chase UNDER 2nd half
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #99
Frogs - Tulsa had more than that, just look at the Houston game and ECU game... WOW!  But, I'm taking Tulsa tonight, I changed my minds after looking closer at this matchup.  Sharp  
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #100
jmorrow - the line was Ball State -2.5 and now it's Tulsa -3....
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.