Schedule only consisted of 4 bowl eligible teams (Oregon, Arizona, ND, Washington)
Sure they have Luck (who is an animal) and a coaching advantage, but what else has Stanford showed you for anyone to lay over a FG vs. probably the hottest team in the country...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Zero wins over teams currently ranked
Claim to fame up 21-3 on Oregon in the 1st half
Best win Notre Dame?
Schedule only consisted of 4 bowl eligible teams (Oregon, Arizona, ND, Washington)
Sure they have Luck (who is an animal) and a coaching advantage, but what else has Stanford showed you for anyone to lay over a FG vs. probably the hottest team in the country...
Schedule only consisted of 4 bowl eligible teams (Oregon, Arizona, ND, Washington)
Sure they have Luck (who is an animal) and a coaching advantage, but what else has Stanford showed you for anyone to lay over a FG vs. probably the hottest team in the country...
You missed Arizona St was was eligible but did not get invited.
Also ND and Washington won both of their bowl games respectively...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:
Zero wins over teams currently ranked
Claim to fame up 21-3 on Oregon in the 1st half
Best win Notre Dame?
Schedule only consisted of 4 bowl eligible teams (Oregon, Arizona, ND, Washington)
Sure they have Luck (who is an animal) and a coaching advantage, but what else has Stanford showed you for anyone to lay over a FG vs. probably the hottest team in the country...
You missed Arizona St was was eligible but did not get invited.
Also ND and Washington won both of their bowl games respectively...
I watched them dominate @Cal, and I was impressed. Especially since Cal was a tough place to win this year.
Cal went 3-3 at home this year..
You watched the Cardinal beat up on Cal with its backup QB in, that same Cal team that went 1-4 with him in, with the only win being by 7 pts vs. Washington State
I also watched Cal lose at home to Washington with a bowl berth on the line..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:
I watched them dominate @Cal, and I was impressed. Especially since Cal was a tough place to win this year.
Cal went 3-3 at home this year..
You watched the Cardinal beat up on Cal with its backup QB in, that same Cal team that went 1-4 with him in, with the only win being by 7 pts vs. Washington State
I also watched Cal lose at home to Washington with a bowl berth on the line..
Virginia Tech has one win over a team currently ranked is that your deciding factor?
FSU for sure, NC State will be ranked after the year end. Additional wins over bowl teams UNC, Miami, GA Tech, East Carolina and Boston College. Lost to Boise (shouldn't have, but blew it)
So in total, beat 7 Bowl Eligible teams, played 8, beat 1 ranked team.
I don't think there's much difference here, both teams are from suspect conferences, but I'd give slight edge to VA Tech with it's wins. Just my opinion . Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:
Virginia Tech has one win over a team currently ranked is that your deciding factor?
FSU for sure, NC State will be ranked after the year end. Additional wins over bowl teams UNC, Miami, GA Tech, East Carolina and Boston College. Lost to Boise (shouldn't have, but blew it)
So in total, beat 7 Bowl Eligible teams, played 8, beat 1 ranked team.
I don't think there's much difference here, both teams are from suspect conferences, but I'd give slight edge to VA Tech with it's wins. Just my opinion . Good luck
ASU was not eligible because 2 of its 6 wins were vs. D2 schools..
Shame on me. I was wrong as I was aware of the rules that state the NCAA allows one victory per season over a Division I FCS (formerly I-AA) team to count toward an FBS team's bowl eligibility. I forgot the Sun Devils had 2 of those wins on their...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:
ASU was not eligible because 2 of its 6 wins were vs. D2 schools..
Shame on me. I was wrong as I was aware of the rules that state the NCAA allows one victory per season over a Division I FCS (formerly I-AA) team to count toward an FBS team's bowl eligibility. I forgot the Sun Devils had 2 of those wins on their...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.