All Forums | College Football

Week 3 Money

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 26621
Posts: 123
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #101
GL WS!
 
with you on Okie St, Stanford, and have a small ML play on BC... only against you on Cal/Minn... but i am not overly confident in that one... Arizona is an interesting play...
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 26036
Posted: #102
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 19516
Posted: #103
BOL Wahoo  - Did you watch TCU/VA? Groh is a dead man walking. I can't believe they would go to the spread with the qb's they have and total lack of receivers. What a mess!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1583
Posted: #104
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

agree with alot of what you wrote here, thanks

this is an early start time for Cal (they lost in the same type of game at Maryland last year) and despite Minnesota not being a good team they usually are a better team at home, they will be fired up to get a top 10 team at home and Cal's defense is suspect in my opinion, I think Minnesota can jump on them early and stay in this game until the end, Riley is playing better this year but that has been against scrubs at home, he has to prove himself on the road, he may cost me money doing so, but I have to see it for myself, I have a feeling the Gophers hang around in this one and have a chance to win the game

Thank you for the additional insight Wahoo, Good Stuff
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6307
Posted: #105
Make some cash Wahoo !
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #106
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

8 plays total, card is complete, best of luck

  • Arkansas - 1
  • Minnesota + 14
  • Okie St. - 32.5
  • Boston College + 7
  • North Carolina - 7
  • Army - 7 hook
  • Arizona + 5
  • Stanford - 16 hook

 

 Hoo to the Bookie

Really like a few of these that you have.....That Minny +14 really stuck out to me like a sore thumb. Getting them at home +14 is a must bet IMO. I dont think they will really stop Best but I think that their QB will move them down the field against the Cal D.

Can you give me a little insight on why you like BC.....I dont know much about BC this year right now and was just wondering why you liked them here. I wasnt liking Clemson here either and was probably going to lay off.

GL this week man   

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #107
Nice writing i agree with almost all u wrote....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2024
Posted: #108
Glad to see wh're on Minny, BC, and UNC. Against you on Arizona, but I'll give you 4 wins if I get 3 out of 4.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25609
Posted: #109
Quote Originally Posted by Papi_4_MVP:

Really like a few of these that you have.....That Minny +14 really stuck out to me like a sore thumb. Getting them at home +14 is a must bet IMO. I dont think they will really stop Best but I think that their QB will move them down the field against the Cal D.

Can you give me a little insight on why you like BC.....I dont know much about BC this year right now and was just wondering why you liked them here. I wasnt liking Clemson here either and was probably going to lay off.

GL this week man   

I think Boston College is more physical than Clemson and I think this game could go either way, 7 points is a decent amount for what I think will be a low scoring defensive battle, Clemson showed some heart coming back against Georgia Tech, but I think after watching Georgia Tech for 2 games that other teams have obviously figured out how to stop that offense, so I don't put much stock in the fact that Clemson actually looked better than Georgia Tech, BC has stronger lines than Clemson in my opinion regardless of the amount of returning starters on either side of the ball

.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2027
Posted: #110
I too liked Minny at first blush, but they have not been very impressive in the first 2 games.  Surprised to see you on them since your rankings have Cal at No. 5, which is a couple spots higher than I rank them.  The early travel makes me think Cal will be ready to play.  I think there is a better chance Minny comes out sleepwalking after all of the hype surrounding last week's game.  This game just confuses me and I may pass.  Good luck this week.  I am also on BC, UNC and Arz - no real opinion on the others. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 20035
Posted: #111
Wahoo pu a few bucks on Elon ML against Wake Forest if you can get the ML.  At least take the spread + whatever.  This QB for Elon is the real deal, he will eat there secondary up
Gambling is only a problem when your losing!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 46593
Posted: #112
let's do it tomorrow wahoos...
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 38795
Posted: #113
GL this week!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3407
Posted: #114
Best of luck today Wahoos...Love your card and found your takeaways from week 2 even more interesting.....Great stuff...BOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 287
Posted: #115
Paps, Minny last year +14 would be the way to go...this year however they just don't seem that impressive...hence the line +14...nonetheless Minny +14 home dog with something to prove, returning seniors, an  intense coach in Brewster, leads me to believe there is some value.   Watch for the line to increase before kick, then grab it. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 2416
Posted: #116
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #117
UNC & Ariz
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6676
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by TRoe15:





Not a fan of seeing you on the other side of one of my bets, let alone against my team.  Like the rest of them though.  I'll hope for a 7-1 day for you.



If Arizona only put up 23 against CMU, what will they do to the hawks at home. I can't believe Wahoo has this play in his card.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 8019
Posted: #119
bol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 355
Posted: #120
I watch you closely, I really had high hopes for you this year.  You are struggling, but I think you will bounce back with an undefeated week 4.  I think next week will be the same as this.  I like seeing your picks four weeks in.
 
  • Arkansas - 1 LOSS
  • Minnesota + 14 PUSH
  • Okie St. - 32.5 LOSS
  • Boston College + 7 LOSS
  • North Carolina - 7 WIN
  • Army - 7 hook  PUSH
  • Arizona + 5  LOSS
  • Stanford - 16 WIN

2-4-2

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 216
Posted: #121
This cats a player. Surely you don't think this is going to get him down do ya? 
 
 
Good job Wahoo. I lost a couple today myself. Unexpected loosers but oh well theres always tomorrow.
 
 
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 64
Posted: #122
Hey Wahoos:  Keep plugging and ignore the chumps and losers, some of whom post here.
 
We value your insight.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1583
Posted: #123
I know you have profitable weeks ahead, ..hang in there WahooS....
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.