All Forums | College Football

Week 12 Money

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10052
Posts: 80
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 17502
Posted: #51
Chip Kelly is 0-2 when the opponent has more than one week to prepare for his spread option.  He is undefeated on a standard 7 day basis.  I could see the entire month of December being enough time for Tressel to devise some plan. That might not be the bloodbath initially expected.

I doubt I would take OSU though because their offense really sucks.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 641
Posted: #52

Wahoos as always  great post and goodluck this week

Wahoos its time brother, time for the LARGE MONEY. Comon wahoos I know u said u would keep those to yourself for the rest of the year but I would love to see it. I know that your large money plays are slightly higer confidence in your opinion and I would love to see it and if its a Large Money play that Im leaning to Ill fire away with much more confidence.

??? Any plays this week qualify as a LARGE MONEY ?

thank you

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25609
Posted: #53
  • LA Tech + 11
  • Virginia + 19
  • Stanford - 6
  • Oregon - 5 
  • Duke + 17.5
  • SDSU + 17.5
  • Rutgers - 7 hook
  • Penn St. - 3 hook
  • BYU - 7 hook
  • Utah St. + 25 hook

    • still waiting on the Uconn line, I have already misjudged a few line movements this week, I hope that one will go up to 7, that is where I need it, card is pretty much final though, Uconn would be the only add from here I think, best of luck

    .
     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 2467
    Posted: #54
    Wahoo,

    Would love to get your thoughts on Rutgers. I don't buy that Rutgers is good enough to be laying this kind of spread in the dome. 
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 8005
    Posted: #55

    Stanford is the play....thanks for the read

     

     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 1782
    Posted: #56
    GL Wahoo and hang in there; it will turn around for you.
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2002
    Posts: 7112
    Posted: #57
    Boise State is dangerous!  Beware!!!!
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 9195
    Posted: #58
    Even if Stanfurd winds up playing against Ohio State in the Rose Bowl and I'm laying less than 7 points I'm all over the Pac 10 team.  tOSU is not a very good football team, and the Big 10 is worse than the ACC and Big East this year
     
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 25609
    Posted: #59

    Quote Originally Posted by PistolPete21:

    Wahoo,

    Would love to get your thoughts on Rutgers. I don't buy that Rutgers is good enough to be laying this kind of spread in the dome. 
    this game is simple for me Pistol

    Rutgers has won the last 4 games against Cuse by 18, by 22, by 31 & by 22, they covered spreads of 14, 17.5 & 16

    Cuse at home in conference has lost by 21 to Cincy, by 21 to West Virginia and by 14 to South Florida

    Rutgers in their last 3 games have scored 31, 28, 27 points

    Cuse in their last 3 games have scored 7, 10, 9 points

     

    Rutgers is playing their best ball of the season right now

    Syracuse is playing their worst ball of the season right now

     

    it doesn't get much more clear to me that Rutgers would be the side to play here, just my opinion

    I bought the juice down to 7, it wasn't a tough decision at all

    .
     
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 25609
    Posted: #60
  • LA Tech + 11
  • Virginia + 19
  • Stanford - 6
  • Oregon - 5 
  • Duke + 17.5
  • SDSU + 17.5
  • Rutgers - 7 hook
  • BYU - 7 hook
  • Utah St. + 25 hook

    • drop Penn St., I can't win on or against that team at any point, I'm gonna find a few more somewhere

    .
     
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 25609
    Posted: #61
    1. LA Tech + 11
    2. Virginia + 19
    3. Stanford - 6
    4. Oregon - 5 
    5. UConn + 7 dos hook
    6. SDSU + 17.5
    7. Rutgers - 7 hook
    8. BYU - 7 hook
    9. Utah St. + 25 hook

     

    I just paid an extraordinary amount of juice to get off Duke, just have a bad feeling about that one, bought dos hook to get Uconn at 7 for relatively low juice, the card is now final, I really think this is 7-2 or better, I will keep the fingers crossed

    best of luck

    .
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2005
    Posts: 8295
    Posted: #62
    I just added Puke Saw a 20 at Greek and had to take it. Puke is no prize, but should Miami really be laying 20 here? I had this fair spread at 16.5. Ugh...I hate losing betting on a team like Duke tho


    With you on USU and SDSU and hopefully TTU

    Best of luck this week Wahoo
     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 1324
    Posted: #63
       Look at SMU.. Marshall has a top wr and rb very questionable for the game..Im taking the points
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 6421
    Posted: #64
    Consistently the best thread on the board.  Gotta agree with placin' units, though.  It's either take the points with Cal or nothing.  Probably nothing for me.
     
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 153
    Posted: #65
    -          -          -          -          -          -         
     
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 25609
    Posted: #67
    1. Colorado + 10 1st half
    2. LA Tech + 11
    3. Virginia + 19
    4. Stanford - 6
    5. Oregon - 5 
    6. UConn + 7 dos hook
    7. SDSU + 17.5
    8. Rutgers - 7 hook
    9. BYU - 7 hook
    10. Utah St. + 25 hook

    added Colorado 1st half, just got a call that Robinson isn't playing, the spread hasn't changed, I'll give it a shot

    .
     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 2314
    Posted: #68
    WahooS, did you ever find out who is starting for Texas Tech? Thanks and Good Luck.
     
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 428
    Posted: #69
     
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 25609
    Posted: #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Get_the_Money:

    WahooS, did you ever find out who is starting for Texas Tech? Thanks and Good Luck.
    I was supposed to get a call if Sheffield could go, I haven't, so I'm almost certain he isn't the starter as of today, if he isn't starting and healthy then I'm not interested in the game, those other two guys are both terrible, Potts will probably get the start though, if I hear a for sure I will let you know
    .
     
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 55433
    Posted: #71

    nice lookin card brother....profit no doubt

     

     
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 641
    Posted: #72

    your card looks good Wahoos. Best luck this weekend. I have some concern of the uconn play. Imo Notre Dame has to play their best at home for their fans this week. With a tuff loss last week bringing it back to south bend----just my opinion. i took them at -6 ?? Wahoos any thoughts on Ohio st -12 ?

     
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 308
    Posted: #73

    Good luck this week Wahoo.  If you get a chance can I get your thoughts on tulane?  I played them at +19 and after dr bob hit ucf , I can get them at over three td now.  By my power rating this line is off by a country mile.  Considering adding some more to the play.  Wanted to see how you see that game playing out.  I think ucf is averaging 23 points per game.  I realize they likely score more than that with tulane road defense but isn't this line asking them to be somewhat perfect ?

     

    I agree Tressell is conservative but he has been great for the gambler.  What are they this year , 8-3 ATS ?  maybe 7-4 just going off memory.  But I know he is good ATS again this year.  57-43 ATS before this year under tressell.  Not many coaches get as much out of their team as Tressell does despite the critics.  He took the buckeyes to the bcs championship game in 2007 during a "rebuilding year"  That being said, it doesn't mean he couldn't be more aggressive with the playcalling and perhaps have an even better record

     

    Rambling but mainly want your take on the tulane at ucf affair if ya get the time.

     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 1287
    Posted: #74

    Rutgers -7

    Against you on BYU but I have AF at +10.5

    no play for me on the rest.

    Stay away from the Tex Tech/ OU game. If Tech doesnt bring pressure it could get ugly. If TT defense brings it it will be a 27-17 type of game and if they dont I see a 37-17

     
     
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 5036
    Posted: #75
    Good luck Wahoo, I'm on UCONN also, but I actually got 10.5, my book had it that for about a 12-hour period late Monday night until early Tuesday morning.  I don't know how or why, and I wasn't gonna ask.  But, there aren't many teams I won't take, catching 10.5 against the Irish.
    All Forums | College Football
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Sports Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gaming
    Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
    Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.