Yo bro, I'm just trying to save you some money. You seem convinced the play is Cal, so put your Big Boy Pants on, and take Cal put ur money on it. If you base your wagers on suspicious lines, then you will go no where in gambling IMO. BOL to you....
WASHINGTON +4
Really????
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:
Yo bro, I'm just trying to save you some money. You seem convinced the play is Cal, so put your Big Boy Pants on, and take Cal put ur money on it. If you base your wagers on suspicious lines, then you will go no where in gambling IMO. BOL to you....
Yo bro, I'm just trying to save you some money. You seem convinced the play is Cal, so put your Big Boy Pants on, and take Cal put ur money on it. If you base your wagers on suspicious lines, then you will go no where in gambling IMO. BOL to you....
WASHINGTON +4
Really????
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:
Yo bro, I'm just trying to save you some money. You seem convinced the play is Cal, so put your Big Boy Pants on, and take Cal put ur money on it. If you base your wagers on suspicious lines, then you will go no where in gambling IMO. BOL to you....
you have to be high on meth to bet a team coached by jeff tedford one of the worst out there!!! man is he bad he could not prepare a pop warner team. he is as good as gone as he has left the building along with his horrid team!!
And your stellar coaching qualifications are???
And if you and tedford showed up for a coaching job, would your resume say...."TEDFORD SUCKS...couldn't prep a pop warner team"
Who knows, maybe the college would give you a crack.....of COCAINE!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jgo22:
you have to be high on meth to bet a team coached by jeff tedford one of the worst out there!!! man is he bad he could not prepare a pop warner team. he is as good as gone as he has left the building along with his horrid team!!
And your stellar coaching qualifications are???
And if you and tedford showed up for a coaching job, would your resume say...."TEDFORD SUCKS...couldn't prep a pop warner team"
Who knows, maybe the college would give you a crack.....of COCAINE!
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
0
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
Look at who they played!! Oregon would run anybody out of their own stadium. LSU has a phenomenal defense, and Arizona proved their skill by taking USC on. If u didn't notice, Washington is said to have arguably the #1 toughest schedule!!. They play a Cal team that is plain terrible, missing a bunch of Linebackers., and their #1 receiver goes down with PCL injury. Cal is on a big spiral downwards and the only thing they have going for them is homefield. Meanwhile, Washington is proving how gritty and good they are by beating a #7 team in the nation in oregon state and a stanford team. Take the Cal Bears if you want, but the clear play is Washington IMO. If u that scared, Id take ATS and not ML. But this is a huge play for me
Washington all the way. +4
BOL BOL BOL
This just stinks of "sucker play".....CAL -4....Under 51.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:
Look at who they played!! Oregon would run anybody out of their own stadium. LSU has a phenomenal defense, and Arizona proved their skill by taking USC on. If u didn't notice, Washington is said to have arguably the #1 toughest schedule!!. They play a Cal team that is plain terrible, missing a bunch of Linebackers., and their #1 receiver goes down with PCL injury. Cal is on a big spiral downwards and the only thing they have going for them is homefield. Meanwhile, Washington is proving how gritty and good they are by beating a #7 team in the nation in oregon state and a stanford team. Take the Cal Bears if you want, but the clear play is Washington IMO. If u that scared, Id take ATS and not ML. But this is a huge play for me
Washington all the way. +4
BOL BOL BOL
This just stinks of "sucker play".....CAL -4....Under 51.
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
Very nice call. You had some bad luck on the Utah/Cal under, but really good luck tonight. 8 turnovers that led to only 10 points, plus Wash failed on 4th down 2 times, and dropped a TD pass, and Cal missed a FG. 850 yards of offense should be good for at least 50 or 60 points...
0
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
Very nice call. You had some bad luck on the Utah/Cal under, but really good luck tonight. 8 turnovers that led to only 10 points, plus Wash failed on 4th down 2 times, and dropped a TD pass, and Cal missed a FG. 850 yards of offense should be good for at least 50 or 60 points...
0-2 last night. Been riding under in Cal games most this year, no different here especially w/keenan Allen out...Bigelow only offensive threat...Cal defense knows they must step up. Also have two struggling offenses, I expect defenses to outmatch eachothers offenses.
Under 51.5
Good luck all
great call dead on
0
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:
38-34
0-2 last night. Been riding under in Cal games most this year, no different here especially w/keenan Allen out...Bigelow only offensive threat...Cal defense knows they must step up. Also have two struggling offenses, I expect defenses to outmatch eachothers offenses.
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:
Really like this under I know the numbers indicate Wash is horrible defensively, but this is more of a product of who they played rather than where they played. I said the same thing last week when BYU hit the road and backed the cougs. Wash played at Ariz,Oregon and LSU...the results likely would not be different where they played Wash and these teams absolutely inflated Wash road woes/stats. CAL is nowhere near the offenses of these teams. LSU doesn't have a powerful offense but they make up for this with a massive offensive line...one that is incomparable to CAL's. I just don't believe CAL will move the ball to the 5.3 yds per carry Wash gives up on the road...it won't come that easy. Especially with CAL being one dimensional. Keenan Allen is just not any player, he is likely top 3 WR off board. He is the in the top 10 in receptions and Maynard go to guy...I don't have the numbers but that is Manyards comfort throwing to him on avg 15 times per game...that is is conservative estimate which is a significant number considering we throw the ball 30 times a game. And Allen is our play-maker, he makes Maynard look good with his playmaking ability and YAC. We do not have a guy that comes close and it will be difficult for Maynard to adjust. I believe Wash will stack the box and make Maynard beat them without his favorite target and brother. Hence I feel this will be a slow, short yardage game with minimal big plays. As long as we do not get multiple nonoffensive TD's or TO to set up TDs this under should hit easily. And even if these offenses are set up in great field position, these two teams are bottom 20 in red zone scoring. Wouldnt surprise me to see these teams fail to score 40, will play alternate lines as well.
Thanks and good luck all, local also gave me 52...added more on it.
and all you other retards... I tried to save yall money, but u refused due to "suspicious" line
Alls i gotta say is sorry bout it....
Washington +4... In the bank.
You're my hero......I lost juice. I will make sure to fade the rest of your plays as well....banking on the fact that a blind squirrel will find an occasional nut.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:
gd2436
Rastad
Mr_Knuckles
and all you other retards... I tried to save yall money, but u refused due to "suspicious" line
Alls i gotta say is sorry bout it....
Washington +4... In the bank.
You're my hero......I lost juice. I will make sure to fade the rest of your plays as well....banking on the fact that a blind squirrel will find an occasional nut.....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
