Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
I'll start one near the beginning of each week. I won't be scouring through the threads to find what each guy has posted and nothing is obligatory. If you guys want to help out and do that, I'll provide the thread. No one is obligated to do anything. If any of the beforementioned guys want to drop a line in the thread with their 2 cents, all the merrier.
I'll start one near the beginning of each week. I won't be scouring through the threads to find what each guy has posted and nothing is obligatory. If you guys want to help out and do that, I'll provide the thread. No one is obligated to do anything. If any of the beforementioned guys want to drop a line in the thread with their 2 cents, all the merrier.
NCSU:
5 - 0 this yr, 2 - 0 ML including the +285 v GT. ![]()
8 - 2 LY ![]()
Not a homer as I am a Seahawk.......................![]()
No offense, but I am more impressed by your avatar. Just kiddin bro (but not really)...what are your thoughts on the game this weekend against VaTech? Line's dropped to 3.5 where I'm lookin now..
NCSU:
5 - 0 this yr, 2 - 0 ML including the +285 v GT. ![]()
8 - 2 LY ![]()
Not a homer as I am a Seahawk.......................![]()
No offense, but I am more impressed by your avatar. Just kiddin bro (but not really)...what are your thoughts on the game this weekend against VaTech? Line's dropped to 3.5 where I'm lookin now..
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Yeah, there's not much behind this info. ![]()
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Yeah, there's not much behind this info. ![]()
Update:
For the record, I am an SMU alumn and would not advise on any of their games other than a lean until I feel comfortable with my grasp on the team. I am getting a btter feel and have not had trouble with them this year. That being said, I am leaning to the Mustangs this weekend.
Update:
For the record, I am an SMU alumn and would not advise on any of their games other than a lean until I feel comfortable with my grasp on the team. I am getting a btter feel and have not had trouble with them this year. That being said, I am leaning to the Mustangs this weekend.
Everybody should be printing this out......use it as a reff, think that might be a good idea, cause this thread will eventually die..i dont want this hard work to go to waste...or if someone else has any idea's>>> -Cover
Everybody should be printing this out......use it as a reff, think that might be a good idea, cause this thread will eventually die..i dont want this hard work to go to waste...or if someone else has any idea's>>> -Cover
bro u forgot one..Boom_Boom.is $$$$ with Clemson ![]()
bro u forgot one..Boom_Boom.is $$$$ with Clemson ![]()
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
Like I mentioned in the beginning of the thread, use it how you want, or don't use it at all. Just a reference to let you know who knows what about who when reading others' threads. If you think you have a firm grasp on, say Wisconsin, and find another guy that feels the same, bounce your thoughts off each other...use each other to feel more secure about your pick, or have the other talk some sense into you.
Mugg a Washington guy and is on USC -10, FYI.
Like I mentioned in the beginning of the thread, use it how you want, or don't use it at all. Just a reference to let you know who knows what about who when reading others' threads. If you think you have a firm grasp on, say Wisconsin, and find another guy that feels the same, bounce your thoughts off each other...use each other to feel more secure about your pick, or have the other talk some sense into you.
Mugg a Washington guy and is on USC -10, FYI.
Good thread cutback. I think you can even break it down by conference. If you're a big Ohio St fan you're gonna have a pretty good pulse on the whole Big 10. Anyway, I'm in Boston so lots of ACC up here. I'm not claiming to be the expert, but I do alright.
Thanks for the thread.
Good thread cutback. I think you can even break it down by conference. If you're a big Ohio St fan you're gonna have a pretty good pulse on the whole Big 10. Anyway, I'm in Boston so lots of ACC up here. I'm not claiming to be the expert, but I do alright.
Thanks for the thread.
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
You mean like lining up and kicking an extra point? Washington will be baffled when USC doesnt go for 2.....that trick play will probably work 99% of the time the rest of the season ![]()
Ask me on Sundays, I am an expert then.
Kiffin has been holding back on some plays, waiting for tougher teams to show them.
Jake Locker 51% completions? With less running too.
USC -10
You mean like lining up and kicking an extra point? Washington will be baffled when USC doesnt go for 2.....that trick play will probably work 99% of the time the rest of the season ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.