All Forums | College Football

Betting by sight..

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1000
Posts: 46
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 327
Posted: #26
Another game to highly consider, should be Michigan State at home against the worst team in college football FAU.  State should cover the spread by halftime.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 277
Posted: #27
How about Boise St -16.5 against Bowling Green, at home on the blue???? Minnesota whipped their sorry asses in BG!
Now they travel west..................
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 277
Posted: #28

candy,

are you north or in south NV???

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #29
I really like those plays(ramsfan & Mike) but, I'd hate to be backdoored..
 
What are the chances of Michigan St. scoring enough for it to still be considered a "convincing win".. and not cover?
 
Actually, the hell with it.. it make's too much sense. I will be on Michigan St. as well as Pinkney.
 
Green Valley
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 282
Posted: #30
SMU +35 JUNE JONES WONT LET THE SCORE GET OUT OF HAND.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 29
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by ramsfan76:

Another game to highly consider, should be Michigan State at home against the worst team in college football FAU.  State should cover the spread by halftime.

Whoa, don't get your Sun Belt patsies confused. Fla Atl might be the best team in the conference, went bowling last year with an 8-5 record. They're ranked 59th in the nation ahead of such teams as Bowling Green, Ore St,, Virg, Wash etc.... Fla Int might be the team you're thinking of.

Either way, Mich St -17 is the right play. Texas covered -24 in week one. Fla Atl doesn't step up well.  0-7 as road dogs of 20 or more, and that's the neighborhood we're in.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #32
SMU seems like a definite "over".. no matter what they set the total.. but, normally.. when it makes too much sense, it's usually the opposite of what's making so much sense.. as if the game goes "under".
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 282
Posted: #33
WASNT TALKING ABOUT THE OVER/UNDER
TALKING LINE. JUNE WONT LET SMU LOOSE BY 35
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 249
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by JohnBoy224:

Georgia, Vandy, Michigan are gonna make you very sad Saturday.

Michigan hasn't covered a game yet, but you're backing up the truck on them on the road at a Rival.


 

I like the way you think!  whole world on Georgia and Mich, yet the lines haven't budged....actually a half pt towards N. Dame.

who knows w/ Vandy/Rice game.....toss up if you ask me

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #35
Keep in mind, they're (+35) for a reason..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #36
And as expected.. five people can witness the same exact crime, and give 5 completely different statements..
 
To all that witnessed the two games Michigan played, and the Notre Dame/Aztec game.. we all have our thoughts about the "perceived" outcome for this upcoming match up.. some being on Michigan, some being on ND.. and some who could care less, due to the two teams being so weak.. but, in all actuality, it's one of the strongest play's on the board.. if you can get over the fact that, even though both teams "do" suck. One has potential to be at least, somewhat decent.. while the other, given from what I've witnessed, has zero chance of a decent season.. and simply stinks up the field, even in victory.
 
Predicting the outcome to this one should easily be accomplished..   
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1194
Posted: #37
i think u are underestimating Rice a bit. they r a solid team, maybe not 300lbs but def more than 175.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #38
You're right.. maybe 200 would be more realistic. It's SEC football, man.. and Vandy hovering around the bottom, would be amongst the tops in other conferences. I really like the chances of this (-7) being covered.. and if it was at (-10.5) or so.. I'd consider laying off.. but, it's not 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3787
Posted: #39
Hey guys what u think about this 9 teamer, 6 point teaser card
 
Arizona -5
cal -9.5
ecu -7
mich st -11
mizzou -20.5
oklahoma -14.5
penn st -22
illinois -19
arizona state -17
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #40
Pretty strong looking ticket.. what do you know about Arizona St.? ..and what type of effort would you expect to witness from the Huskies, given what happened to them last weekend.. would it be enough to stay within?.. or, would it even matter, because Oklahoma's that much dominant? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3787
Posted: #41
ASU is pretty strong, Carpenter is a talented QB. Since Utah blew out UNLV last weekend, I expect the same from ASU. I think OU is too dominant, BYU's defense is nowhere of OKlahomas , I expect OU to win 2 1/2- 3 tds over Wash. Just  iffy about East carolina, usually there the ones always on the plus side, but i guess they have all the momentum on them right now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #42
You're right..  from what I've seen, I love ECU as being a plus team.. but, being minus against Tulane should come through for you
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 327
Posted: #43

Quote Originally Posted by Luke451:


Whoa, don't get your Sun Belt patsies confused. Fla Atl might be the best team in the conference, went bowling last year with an 8-5 record. They're ranked 59th in the nation ahead of such teams as Bowling Green, Ore St,, Virg, Wash etc.... Fla Int might be the team you're thinking of.

Either way, Mich St -17 is the right play. Texas covered -24 in week one. Fla Atl doesn't step up well.  0-7 as road dogs of 20 or more, and that's the neighborhood we're in.

Definately had my Floridas mixed up. However State will put an ass whipping on FAU.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 194
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by candyfrombabies:

From an eight teamer to a five teamer..
 
I'm rockin' and rollin' with:
 
Vandy
Oregon
'Zona
C. Michigan
UCLA
 
Once again.. thanks to all who helped contribute

Dont like Oregon or Vandy.  I would trade them for South Florida -3 and South Caolina +7.5.  Or if you arent comfortable with the SC pick (most in here arent) then put in Miss State +10.5.

Just trying to help.  My opinion is that Parlays are a complete waste of money.  But good luck anyway.  2 teamers at most, but almost always straight plays.

Enjoy

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 7191
Posted: #45
Vandy
Oregon
'Zona
C. Michigan
UCLA
 
I hope you were paying close attention to what you saw, cause I'm on Vandy, C Mich, and Oregon with you. 
 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 72
Posted: #46
Take the over52 penn st/syracuse.Penn st is firing on all cylinders and might cover the over on their own.Syracuse on the other hand gave up 42 points at home to the Akron Zips! and i think there offense can muster up at least17 points especially with all the garbage time at the end of the game.............i think its a good pick to toss in the 8 teamer,a pick out of the usual suspects
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.