All Forums | College Football

2 year extension for Purdue Coach

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1212
Posts: 18
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #1

i think that will motivate this team and have them looking at performing for their spots going into next year. A win is important after 4 years of no bowl. Have to think they are dominate in talent based on leagues... Dont think the mac has done well vs big ten over he year, or years. Line movement is strange and may just be a deterant...

Gotta wonder with Consensus on Purdue, how does the line go down ??? Not that much money coming in on WM... I have seen it go both ways, it will put doubt in bettors minds...

Not enough of a lean for either to make a big bet....

33-30.5 purdue

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3803
Posted: #2
but what does scare me is that purdue's starting RB who was injured is out and their center is doubtful if im not mistaken.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 490
Posted: #3
Everyone on this forum is on w.mich. That is usually good fade material just like unc yesterday.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #4
LOL at an extension with a 6-6 record
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #5

Quote Originally Posted by nflpicker14:

Everyone on this forum is on w.mich. That is usually good fade material just like unc yesterday.

me too, even bumped Mizz up to -8.5 at +148

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 425
Posted: #6
I like Purdue -3 and the under 62.5........Purdue's RB, Bolden, is out and it's their WR, Ross, who is out.  However Purdue has several RB's who have played minutes this year and having Bolden out isn't devastating.
When W Mich has matched up against the other 2 Big Ten teams this year they averaged 15 pts per game!  Sure, they score 50 a game v.s the Toledo and Akron's but I just don't see W Mich scoring more than 24 in this one.  So basically, Purdue needs to put up at least 40 to hit the over....I don't see that happening either!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 10209
Posted: #7
I love all these threads saying everyone in the forum is on WMU, yet the poster is on PURDUE 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 10209
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by skimo18:

I like Purdue -3 and the under 62.5........Purdue's RB, Bolden, is out and it's their WR, Ross, who is out.  However Purdue has several RB's who have played minutes this year and having Bolden out isn't devastating.
When W Mich has matched up against the other 2 Big Ten teams this year they averaged 15 pts per game!  Sure, they score 50 a game v.s the Toledo and Akron's but I just don't see W Mich scoring more than 24 in this one.  So basically, Purdue needs to put up at least 40 to hit the over....I don't see that happening either!

That was against Illinois and Michigan, who have by far better defenses than Purdue.  This is pretty much a home game for WMU.  Inside on a fast track for that offense is scary.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #9

Quote Originally Posted by DanTos8715:

I love all these threads saying everyone in the forum is on WMU, yet the poster is on PURDUE 

I agree. I see just as many people on Purdue as I do WMU! Not sure why anyone would cap their games by how many people on this forum or on one team or the other

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by DanTos8715:

I love all these threads saying everyone in the forum is on WMU, yet the poster is on PURDUE 

For the most part he is right, or at least most of those posting are on WM, I think looking for someone to agree with them. And or most of the EMPLOYEES that want more money over to that side for their customers. Seems to be the way it works and youhave to read between the lines.

You are right about the better teams in the big ten that WM faced. But the big ten is 11 - 1 vs mac this year, or close to that. Just heads above. Could go either way I guess, that is why I am small on it, good luck to you how ever you bet...

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13951
Posted: #11

I have been on Western Michigan, but changed my mind and played Purdue -.5 @ -105 (1st Half).  I know that the Boilermakers are a little beat-up, but I get the feeling Purdue is very motivated to get a win here.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 425
Posted: #12
Just got Purdue -2.5 and U/64 from my local....BTW he is located 5 minutes from Purdue's campus so he's getting  a ton of action on this game!   Actually, Purdue's strength this year has been their Def, certainly not their Offense....it's been a bend but don't break too often Def. Scary.  It could certainly go either way.  I'm hoping the D shows up one more time!!
GLTA!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by skimo18:

Just got Purdue -2.5 and U/64 from my local....BTW he is located 5 minutes from Purdue's campus so he's getting  a ton of action on this game!   Actually, Purdue's strength this year has been their Def, certainly not their Offense....it's been a bend but don't break too often Def. Scary.  It could certainly go either way.  I'm hoping the D shows up one more time!!
GLTA!!

That book will make money regardless. Just hope he brings in 50 k so he can move 25 of it...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 5789
Posted: #14
so many people on W.Mich but I'm not leaning Purdue just because of this nor because its in Michigan. I think purdue is the better team here. Purdue take it
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 490
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

I agree. I see just as many people on Purdue as I do WMU! Not sure why anyone would cap their games by how many people on this forum or on one team or the other



All you had to do is read 20 posts to see that at least 15 were on wmu.  It's good info to have and public perception is a key factor in my handicapping.  And yes, the covers forum is the public.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by nflpicker14:



All you had to do is read 20 posts to see that at least 15 were on wmu.  It's good info to have and public perception is a key factor in my handicapping.  And yes, the covers forum is the public.

LOL! Whatever.

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 490
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

LOL! Whatever.




 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 425
Posted: #18
  Boiler up!
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.