The thing about this is that they are almost always nail-biters. We are playing on such a small difference in the line that it makes it a bit tight when looking at these covering.
It should have been 55, it would have been an under winner. But they shaded too much, so we had to take advantage. What we did is literally just take advantage of the book playing with the line.
There are some opps coming up in these games now too....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:
wow RJ that over 53 was close
The thing about this is that they are almost always nail-biters. We are playing on such a small difference in the line that it makes it a bit tight when looking at these covering.
It should have been 55, it would have been an under winner. But they shaded too much, so we had to take advantage. What we did is literally just take advantage of the book playing with the line.
There are some opps coming up in these games now too....
yeah rj i think they are setting the fist half totals to low because they have got burned in the past? i know i always go first half under and have done well but now they are to low. i would have gone under 55 in that unc wilm first half but stayed away.
0
yeah rj i think they are setting the fist half totals to low because they have got burned in the past? i know i always go first half under and have done well but now they are to low. i would have gone under 55 in that unc wilm first half but stayed away.
yeah rj i think they are setting the fist half totals to low because they have got burned in the past? i know i always go first half under and have done well but now they are to low. i would have gone under 55 in that unc wilm first half but stayed away.
55 I would have gone under too. I was looking to play the under. Its just a 2pt move on a half??? Yeah fucking right.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:
yeah rj i think they are setting the fist half totals to low because they have got burned in the past? i know i always go first half under and have done well but now they are to low. i would have gone under 55 in that unc wilm first half but stayed away.
55 I would have gone under too. I was looking to play the under. Its just a 2pt move on a half??? Yeah fucking right.
Good stuff Sizzle. I cant play either side of the Tow/Drex game. Laying 10 is just not something I do often, especially when a teams got double revenge.....
BOL tonight
0
Good stuff Sizzle. I cant play either side of the Tow/Drex game. Laying 10 is just not something I do often, especially when a teams got double revenge.....
Going to leave in a bit to go boarding this weekend...rain hold off...going with:
Northern Iowa +2, Detroit +2.5, Evansville +4, Miami Ohio +1, Wright State +3 ev
Good luck today and this weekend.
If you want to do some REAL boarding, get yourself over here to Lake Tahoe. I live in Reno and have about 6 or 7 resorts within an hour of my house. definitely cant complain about that!
Enjoy your weekend bud and BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
Going to leave in a bit to go boarding this weekend...rain hold off...going with:
Northern Iowa +2, Detroit +2.5, Evansville +4, Miami Ohio +1, Wright State +3 ev
Good luck today and this weekend.
If you want to do some REAL boarding, get yourself over here to Lake Tahoe. I live in Reno and have about 6 or 7 resorts within an hour of my house. definitely cant complain about that!
Hey RJ in some of your posts you say "the line says" this or "the line says that". So how come when a team has lost 18 in a row and the line goes from 10.5 to 9.5 very quickly the line doesn't say take Townson?
I'm asking because that kind of talk really bothers me and you seem smarter than the average moron here.
0
Hey RJ in some of your posts you say "the line says" this or "the line says that". So how come when a team has lost 18 in a row and the line goes from 10.5 to 9.5 very quickly the line doesn't say take Townson?
I'm asking because that kind of talk really bothers me and you seem smarter than the average moron here.
Hey RJ in some of your posts you say "the line says" this or "the line says that". So how come when a team has lost 18 in a row and the line goes from 10.5 to 9.5 very quickly the line doesn't say take Townson?
I'm asking because that kind of talk really bothers me and you seem smarter than the average moron here.
RJ is what some would call lesser-equipped to discuss betting logic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasMaxx:
Hey RJ in some of your posts you say "the line says" this or "the line says that". So how come when a team has lost 18 in a row and the line goes from 10.5 to 9.5 very quickly the line doesn't say take Townson?
I'm asking because that kind of talk really bothers me and you seem smarter than the average moron here.
RJ is what some would call lesser-equipped to discuss betting logic.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.