All Forums | College Basketball

Monday Hoops

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 16375
Posts: 135
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #26
what a fucking kick in the nuts! unreal! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2388
Posted: #27
 im taking marq -1.5 2nd half, lousiville looked broken at the end of the half
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 510
Posted: #28
did not see the game, but it was 62 points with about 1:30 to go, did you mean a kick in the nuts because of the good shooting of both team and it also got over only by 1 point? 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 26683
Posted: #29
they shoot about 30% between both teams,that 18 points Louisville put up in first 5 mins was the reason it lost.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by chrisz:

did not see the game, but it was 62 points with about 1:30 to go, did you mean a kick in the nuts because of the good shooting of both team and it also got over only by 1 point? 

losing by 1 after MU couldn't score in the first 8:00 min. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #31

Thanks for the write-up on the Pitt/Cuse ov 135.5

What do you think of 1H over 63?

If the 1H o/u is 63 and FG is 135.5 then that implies a 72.5 for the 2H. 

Isn't the 10 pt difference b/t 1H and 2H in college hoops normally accounted for last minute fouls in the 2H, which obviously don't occur in the 1H?  But how much risk of fouls are there in a 13-pt spread? 

Without fouls, isn't 1H and 2H scoring pretty much the same? In fact, in a blowout, isn't 2H scoring lower?

In short, is there more value in 1H 63 instead of FG 135.5?

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by composite:

Thanks for the write-up on the Pitt/Cuse ov 135.5

What do you think of 1H over 63?

If the 1H o/u is 63 and FG is 135.5 then that implies a 72.5 for the 2H. 

Isn't the 10 pt difference b/t 1H and 2H in college hoops normally accounted for last minute fouls in the 2H, which obviously don't occur in the 1H?  But how much risk of fouls are there in a 13-pt spread? 

Without fouls, isn't 1H and 2H scoring pretty much the same? In fact, in a blowout, isn't 2H scoring lower?

In short, is there more value in 1H 63 instead of FG 135.5?

 


1H holds value if you think in fact that the game will line up to be a 13 point spread late in the game. Just b/c the line is 13, doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be close at the end. But yah, you're on the right wavelength.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


1H holds value if you think in fact that the game will line up to be a 13 point spread late in the game. Just b/c the line is 13, doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be close at the end. But yah, you're on the right wavelength.

Thanks.  I'll probably throw something on the 1H, unless you really think Pitt +13 is a great bet.

When I watch college basketball, it seems like a 9 pt (or more) deficit w/ 1:00 left or so, is the magic number when teams don't bother fouling.   8 pts or less (but greater than 3) and they foul like crazy.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 1962
Posted: #34
Looks like 0-2 in the day games....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 2388
Posted: #35
 both unders
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 8135
Posted: #36
Missouri has scored 28 points in the last 6 minutes... wow. Two games, two very rough beats
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 1962
Posted: #37
I really like the Syr/Pitt over.... so all will be well.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 3149
Posted: #38
WOW
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 1962
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by daviddaman24:

Missouri has scored 28 points in the last 6 minutes... wow. Two games, two very rough beats

Just two bad picks....  time to move on

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2093
Posted: #40
need to avoid these droughts. Both team have had droughts. Cuse needs to run and play to their strengths.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 755
Posted: #41
Watching his Cuse Pitt game...  Not looking good.  Hope they turn up the pace. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 250
Posted: #42
 pitt over is toast
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 1962
Posted: #43

Haha....every time I tail u, u lose. Its amazing, U know more shit than anyone on the planet, yet u are 0fer today. Please leave lol.... jk

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 755
Posted: #44
Pace is picking up. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 250
Posted: #45

over. is. toast.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 189
Posted: #46
Hoping for triple overtime
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 70
Posted: #47
pace a little slow
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 755
Posted: #48
Ya.  Its done.  Pitt sucks they cant handle the press.  Wish i wouldve just taken Cuse...  Oh well
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2093
Posted: #49
Still early... if we can get to 60 at the half I think we can get 76 in the 2nd half... 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 755
Posted: #50
IN Game Over Under is 136...  
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.