I will try to get on later, limited on time.......Trying to help as much as i could to crush the books.......Thanks all for the great comments........Covers is a great tool to help us all.....
Kurn, I set up an account here on Covers just to thank you for your efforts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kurn:
I will try to get on later, limited on time.......Trying to help as much as i could to crush the books.......Thanks all for the great comments........Covers is a great tool to help us all.....
Kurn, I set up an account here on Covers just to thank you for your efforts.
I don't think Covers cares about banning winners. Most gamblers have so many bad habits that they'll go broke following winners anyway. They also sell lots of advertising and the rates have to be based upon viewership. Books just want action, as evidenced by them giving away bonuses when you deposit money. They know that over time gamblers will not use discipline and will end up losing money. As for covers - it looks like they get money from 2 sources: 1) Selling advertising on their site - which is based upon #users, amount of time the users are on the site - as evidenced by views, etc. 2) Selling the services of their experts from which I assume they make a percentage.
That's it. No conspiracy theory. No Jason Bourne superspies putting out hits on the big winners.
Seems they only want to eliminate any touts who compete against their second revenue stream.
Seems reasonable to me.
0
I don't think Covers cares about banning winners. Most gamblers have so many bad habits that they'll go broke following winners anyway. They also sell lots of advertising and the rates have to be based upon viewership. Books just want action, as evidenced by them giving away bonuses when you deposit money. They know that over time gamblers will not use discipline and will end up losing money. As for covers - it looks like they get money from 2 sources: 1) Selling advertising on their site - which is based upon #users, amount of time the users are on the site - as evidenced by views, etc. 2) Selling the services of their experts from which I assume they make a percentage.
That's it. No conspiracy theory. No Jason Bourne superspies putting out hits on the big winners.
Seems they only want to eliminate any touts who compete against their second revenue stream.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Nice picks the last few days
Hot Forum Topics
