TOR/CGY over 6 ½ -130 Locking this in during the wee hours of the morning as I already know I’ll be taking it tomorrow. If you throw out Chicago, you’d be looking at a match-up of the two teams that are the least physical in the league. They rank #29 & #31 in hits. A perfect match-up for some free-flowing offense with plenty of chances on both ends. Now factor in we have two teams tied for 3rd in the league with an 11.1% shooting percentage, and the #2 & #4 team in terms of GFA and the over is the bet to put your chips on.
TOR/CGY over 6 ½ -130 Locking this in during the wee hours of the morning as I already know I’ll be taking it tomorrow. If you throw out Chicago, you’d be looking at a match-up of the two teams that are the least physical in the league. They rank #29 & #31 in hits. A perfect match-up for some free-flowing offense with plenty of chances on both ends. Now factor in we have two teams tied for 3rd in the league with an 11.1% shooting percentage, and the #2 & #4 team in terms of GFA and the over is the bet to put your chips on.
Both games last year and their only game this year all went under. I’ve been cold lately but you figure they’re due?
Games from prior seasons have absolutely zero relevancy in terms of who these teams are now so year's past stuff has never factored into any of my personal betting decisions.
Their only game earlier this year was way back in October a whole 3 weeks into the season and we're in March now so can't say that game means all too much to me, either.
I don't know if they're "due" or not but I feel these two make for a open style of offensive game which could lead to goals if the offenses perform at the high rate that they have all season. Nothing in the betting world is a guarantee, though.
Both games last year and their only game this year all went under. I’ve been cold lately but you figure they’re due?
Games from prior seasons have absolutely zero relevancy in terms of who these teams are now so year's past stuff has never factored into any of my personal betting decisions.
Their only game earlier this year was way back in October a whole 3 weeks into the season and we're in March now so can't say that game means all too much to me, either.
I don't know if they're "due" or not but I feel these two make for a open style of offensive game which could lead to goals if the offenses perform at the high rate that they have all season. Nothing in the betting world is a guarantee, though.
I knew it didn't sound right. I got that saying from this guy that won a million bucks. He used to say that to me. But I guess I got it wrong. Thanks for the correction..
I knew it didn't sound right. I got that saying from this guy that won a million bucks. He used to say that to me. But I guess I got it wrong. Thanks for the correction..
If only my non-posted record made it into my posted record, smh. I took the over in the early game and did an Action reverse for a half unit for +2 units on both the overs as well.
If only my non-posted record made it into my posted record, smh. I took the over in the early game and did an Action reverse for a half unit for +2 units on both the overs as well.
CAR/BOS under 6 -130 Both teams come in playing well and both teams are high possession puck control teams and thusly each gives up very limited chances against—Carolina ranks 2 in the league in fewest chances allowed and Boston ranks 7. With the addition of McElhiney, Carolina has found some consistent goaltending and each team ranks high in Team Save percentage. McElhiney has only allowed 6 goals in his last 5 games (1.20) and the Boston tandem of Halak and Rask own the 2 best save % in the league. Similar to McElhiney, Boston as a team has also only allowed 6 goals in their last 5 games (1.20)
CLB -1/2 -125 I like the Jackets and I like the balls of their GM going for it instead of cashing in and preserving his job. I know some people on this forum disagree but when your team is a point or two out of a WC spot, you go for it, you don’t sell off and wait for next year. Don’t personally care about the circumstances. I like the aggressive style and honestly, imo, it made sense. The Jackets have been a very strong defensive team—only Carolina and Calgary have allowed fewer chances against. They needed help on offense and went after the top guy on the market and got him. They came out of the gate after the deadline with back-to-back shut outs but since have lost 3 of 4. They need to regroup and they should be able to do so here against a very weak Devils club.
NYI -1 ½ -110 These Isles, man. I’m telling ya. Never seen a more terrible possession team somehow keep winning games. This is a bottom for Corsi Team now and their defensive metrics of Corsi Allowed is all the way up to #17 in the league. They used to rank in the high 20s which helped make their success make sense but as these last two months have gone by, they’ve begun to give up more and more chances per game. Only ANA, NYR & OTT create less then they do on the offensive side. They made zero moves at the trade deadline for the second year in a row—which is mind boggling to me, but even this tea, which is due for a big regression, should be able to snuff out this current Senators roster.
CAR/BOS under 6 -130 Both teams come in playing well and both teams are high possession puck control teams and thusly each gives up very limited chances against—Carolina ranks 2 in the league in fewest chances allowed and Boston ranks 7. With the addition of McElhiney, Carolina has found some consistent goaltending and each team ranks high in Team Save percentage. McElhiney has only allowed 6 goals in his last 5 games (1.20) and the Boston tandem of Halak and Rask own the 2 best save % in the league. Similar to McElhiney, Boston as a team has also only allowed 6 goals in their last 5 games (1.20)
CLB -1/2 -125 I like the Jackets and I like the balls of their GM going for it instead of cashing in and preserving his job. I know some people on this forum disagree but when your team is a point or two out of a WC spot, you go for it, you don’t sell off and wait for next year. Don’t personally care about the circumstances. I like the aggressive style and honestly, imo, it made sense. The Jackets have been a very strong defensive team—only Carolina and Calgary have allowed fewer chances against. They needed help on offense and went after the top guy on the market and got him. They came out of the gate after the deadline with back-to-back shut outs but since have lost 3 of 4. They need to regroup and they should be able to do so here against a very weak Devils club.
NYI -1 ½ -110 These Isles, man. I’m telling ya. Never seen a more terrible possession team somehow keep winning games. This is a bottom for Corsi Team now and their defensive metrics of Corsi Allowed is all the way up to #17 in the league. They used to rank in the high 20s which helped make their success make sense but as these last two months have gone by, they’ve begun to give up more and more chances per game. Only ANA, NYR & OTT create less then they do on the offensive side. They made zero moves at the trade deadline for the second year in a row—which is mind boggling to me, but even this tea, which is due for a big regression, should be able to snuff out this current Senators roster.
FLA/PIT over 6 ½ -140 Goddamn lines are horseshit. Florida has lost 4-straight and now find themselves 10 points back of the closest WC spot. Reality should start to set in that it’s a lost season and with it could lead to more careless play which, if you add in the dead last team goaltending save percentage, but an offense that can score—the over looks like a nice bet here. The over has cashed in 7 of the Panthers last 9 games.
NYR/DAL under 6 -125 The Stars and the Rangers—two teams who dislike scoring. They sit #29 & #30 respectively in chances created in the offensive end. Ben Bishop at home has been solid all year posting a .930 Save% and 2.16 GAA in Dallas.
COL -1/2 -145 Detroit has now lost 7-straight and they’ve given up 11 goals in their last 2 games and 33 combined over this losing streak (4.71). Colorado had beaten a handful of very good teams to go on a 6-2 run and get back into the wild card chase but have now lost 2-straight, so they need this game to get back some momentum and a team like the Red Wings is who you want on the ice to make that happen.
ANA/ARZ under 5 ½ -135 The Coyotes keep chugging along and with each win their confidence must grow as they inch closer to a playoff prize position. They’ve won 6-straight, outscoring teams 22-11 and also are winners of 9 of 11 overall. Helping to fuel Arizona’s run has been very solid goaltending—giving up 11 goals during the streak (1.83). Anaheim’s pop gun offense heads to town so for me, and with the Coyotes losing playmaker Stepan to injury, I’ll take a stab at the under here.
FLA/PIT over 6 ½ -140 Goddamn lines are horseshit. Florida has lost 4-straight and now find themselves 10 points back of the closest WC spot. Reality should start to set in that it’s a lost season and with it could lead to more careless play which, if you add in the dead last team goaltending save percentage, but an offense that can score—the over looks like a nice bet here. The over has cashed in 7 of the Panthers last 9 games.
NYR/DAL under 6 -125 The Stars and the Rangers—two teams who dislike scoring. They sit #29 & #30 respectively in chances created in the offensive end. Ben Bishop at home has been solid all year posting a .930 Save% and 2.16 GAA in Dallas.
COL -1/2 -145 Detroit has now lost 7-straight and they’ve given up 11 goals in their last 2 games and 33 combined over this losing streak (4.71). Colorado had beaten a handful of very good teams to go on a 6-2 run and get back into the wild card chase but have now lost 2-straight, so they need this game to get back some momentum and a team like the Red Wings is who you want on the ice to make that happen.
ANA/ARZ under 5 ½ -135 The Coyotes keep chugging along and with each win their confidence must grow as they inch closer to a playoff prize position. They’ve won 6-straight, outscoring teams 22-11 and also are winners of 9 of 11 overall. Helping to fuel Arizona’s run has been very solid goaltending—giving up 11 goals during the streak (1.83). Anaheim’s pop gun offense heads to town so for me, and with the Coyotes losing playmaker Stepan to injury, I’ll take a stab at the under here.
Van 2-8. 14 goals last 10 gamesBig injury list and Hutton (foot) didn't practise TuesHorvat, Boeser and Pettersson burnt out Tor -1.5 . +137Parlay Tor and ?
Some fear a TOR letdown after big Calgary win. Never easy.
I was too annoyed to bet today and I'm glad. Would have lost on Toronto in some way and would have bet something on the STL game, either the side, the ANA TT under or the game under maybe all of it and lost everything again.
Van 2-8. 14 goals last 10 gamesBig injury list and Hutton (foot) didn't practise TuesHorvat, Boeser and Pettersson burnt out Tor -1.5 . +137Parlay Tor and ?
Some fear a TOR letdown after big Calgary win. Never easy.
I was too annoyed to bet today and I'm glad. Would have lost on Toronto in some way and would have bet something on the STL game, either the side, the ANA TT under or the game under maybe all of it and lost everything again.
Didn't get a chance to respond yesterday but I do agree that it's no longer safe to blindly bet on Binnington. The Blues overall have not been playing as good lately and that may or may not be the reason he is faltering, but it could also be separate. I'm staying away from the Blues for a little until they figure things out.
Didn't get a chance to respond yesterday but I do agree that it's no longer safe to blindly bet on Binnington. The Blues overall have not been playing as good lately and that may or may not be the reason he is faltering, but it could also be separate. I'm staying away from the Blues for a little until they figure things out.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.