- Spurs +10 ($1,500)
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy Gay and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy Gay and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
The issue for Spurs backers is this:
Even if GSW is up 15 with 4 minutes to go and the only hope is for a backdoor - the Spurs bench will still have to contend with prolific 3 pts shooters in Quinn Cook, Nick Young, as well as long athletic players such as Damian Jones and Looney.
Who's going to get you a backdoor cover? Bertans?
I don't see it.
GSW Sweep and they cover the 9.5 on Monday.
The issue for Spurs backers is this:
Even if GSW is up 15 with 4 minutes to go and the only hope is for a backdoor - the Spurs bench will still have to contend with prolific 3 pts shooters in Quinn Cook, Nick Young, as well as long athletic players such as Damian Jones and Looney.
Who's going to get you a backdoor cover? Bertans?
I don't see it.
GSW Sweep and they cover the 9.5 on Monday.
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy happy and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy happy and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy happy and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
What options does Pop have outside of starting Rudy happy and incresaing his minutes? The Spurs just don't have the depth or athletism to match up with GSW in any way, shape, or form.
GSW is longer, more athletic, better TS%, better defensively, I really don't know any statistical categories where the Spurs are superior. Starting the longer Javale Mcgee is a nightmare for Lamarcus Aldridge who was held to 14 points, with the majority of those points coming outside of the paint.
I'm going heavy GSW -9.5 on Monday.
BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.