Marc Lawrence published this system and the numbers are not what I get....you can put the text below into the query box in either sportsdatabase or killersports and come up with 8-14 ATS and 8-14 straight up....if the team in question is on the road it goes to 3-9 ATS and 2-10 SU.
week=19 and pp:L and p:HW and playoffs=1 and A
Marc Lawrence published this system and the numbers are not what I get....you can put the text below into the query box in either sportsdatabase or killersports and come up with 8-14 ATS and 8-14 straight up....if the team in question is on the road it goes to 3-9 ATS and 2-10 SU.
week=19 and pp:L and p:HW and playoffs=1 and A
I re-ran the query that I posted two threads ago....at some point in the NFL evidently there were two bye weeks, not one, and I'm not inclined to go back and check when that started happening so the results I gave previously were not accurate.
Running it again into sportsdatabase in the text below gives an amended result of 2-13-1 ATS and 1-15 straight up, which fits both the Jaguars and the Saints this week.
pp:playoffs=0 and p:playoffs=1 and pp:L and p:HW and A
2001 Raiders + 3 Patriots 13-16
2002 49ers +6 Bucs 6-31
2004 Colts +2 Patriots 3-20
2004 Falcons +4 Eagles 10-27
2005 Pats +3' Broncos 13-27
2006 Saints +3 Bears 14-39
2007 Seahawks 8' Packers 20-42
2009 Cards +7 Saints 14-45
2011 Broncos +13' Patriots 10-45
2011 Texans +7' Ravens 13-20
2012 Ravens +9 Broncos 38-35
2012 Packers +3 49ers 31-45
2012 Texans +9 Patriots 28-41
2015 Patriots -3 Broncos 18-20
2015 Cardinals +3 Panthers 15-49
2016 Texans +16 Patriots 16-34
2017 Jaguars +7 Steelers
2017 Saints +5 Vikings
I re-ran the query that I posted two threads ago....at some point in the NFL evidently there were two bye weeks, not one, and I'm not inclined to go back and check when that started happening so the results I gave previously were not accurate.
Running it again into sportsdatabase in the text below gives an amended result of 2-13-1 ATS and 1-15 straight up, which fits both the Jaguars and the Saints this week.
pp:playoffs=0 and p:playoffs=1 and pp:L and p:HW and A
2001 Raiders + 3 Patriots 13-16
2002 49ers +6 Bucs 6-31
2004 Colts +2 Patriots 3-20
2004 Falcons +4 Eagles 10-27
2005 Pats +3' Broncos 13-27
2006 Saints +3 Bears 14-39
2007 Seahawks 8' Packers 20-42
2009 Cards +7 Saints 14-45
2011 Broncos +13' Patriots 10-45
2011 Texans +7' Ravens 13-20
2012 Ravens +9 Broncos 38-35
2012 Packers +3 49ers 31-45
2012 Texans +9 Patriots 28-41
2015 Patriots -3 Broncos 18-20
2015 Cardinals +3 Panthers 15-49
2016 Texans +16 Patriots 16-34
2017 Jaguars +7 Steelers
2017 Saints +5 Vikings
For Saints, 5 of those 8 games against playoff teams were on the road. Including a Thursday night tilt @Atlanta. Saints were 2-3. Brutal schedule.
For Vikings, 3 of their 5 on the road. Vikings were 1-2.
For Saints, 5 of those 8 games against playoff teams were on the road. Including a Thursday night tilt @Atlanta. Saints were 2-3. Brutal schedule.
For Vikings, 3 of their 5 on the road. Vikings were 1-2.
You missed a tie (2011 Texans/Ravens). So 2-12-2 ATS.
I doubt this stat changes much if the team won their last game then hosted 1st playoff game before traveling.
The home team in the divisional round wins most of their matchups, period.
You missed a tie (2011 Texans/Ravens). So 2-12-2 ATS.
I doubt this stat changes much if the team won their last game then hosted 1st playoff game before traveling.
The home team in the divisional round wins most of their matchups, period.
The Saints will be the first ones since the 2015 (12-4) Patriots, who covered.
The Saints will be the first ones since the 2015 (12-4) Patriots, who covered.
Half of the Saints schedule was against playoff opponents. And 5 of those 8 were on the road. Not that tough? The fuck are you smoking?
Half of the Saints schedule was against playoff opponents. And 5 of those 8 were on the road. Not that tough? The fuck are you smoking?
I re-ran the query that I posted two threads ago....at some point in the NFL evidently there were two bye weeks, not one, and I'm not inclined to go back and check when that started happening so the results I gave previously were not accurate.
Running it again into sportsdatabase in the text below gives an amended result of 2-13-1 ATS and 1-15 straight up, which fits both the Jaguars and the Saints this week.
pp:playoffs=0 and p:playoffs=1 and pp:L and p:HW and A
2001 Raiders + 3 Patriots 13-16
2002 49ers +6 Bucs 6-31
2004 Colts +2 Patriots 3-20
2004 Falcons +4 Eagles 10-27
2005 Pats +3' Broncos 13-27
2006 Saints +3 Bears 14-39
2007 Seahawks 8' Packers 20-42
2009 Cards +7 Saints 14-45
2011 Broncos +13' Patriots 10-45
2011 Texans +7' Ravens 13-20
2012 Ravens +9 Broncos 38-35
2012 Packers +3 49ers 31-45
2012 Texans +9 Patriots 28-41
2015 Patriots -3 Broncos 18-20
2015 Cardinals +3 Panthers 15-49
2016 Texans +16 Patriots 16-34
2017 Jaguars +7 Steelers
2017 Saints +5 Vikings
I re-ran the query that I posted two threads ago....at some point in the NFL evidently there were two bye weeks, not one, and I'm not inclined to go back and check when that started happening so the results I gave previously were not accurate.
Running it again into sportsdatabase in the text below gives an amended result of 2-13-1 ATS and 1-15 straight up, which fits both the Jaguars and the Saints this week.
pp:playoffs=0 and p:playoffs=1 and pp:L and p:HW and A
2001 Raiders + 3 Patriots 13-16
2002 49ers +6 Bucs 6-31
2004 Colts +2 Patriots 3-20
2004 Falcons +4 Eagles 10-27
2005 Pats +3' Broncos 13-27
2006 Saints +3 Bears 14-39
2007 Seahawks 8' Packers 20-42
2009 Cards +7 Saints 14-45
2011 Broncos +13' Patriots 10-45
2011 Texans +7' Ravens 13-20
2012 Ravens +9 Broncos 38-35
2012 Packers +3 49ers 31-45
2012 Texans +9 Patriots 28-41
2015 Patriots -3 Broncos 18-20
2015 Cardinals +3 Panthers 15-49
2016 Texans +16 Patriots 16-34
2017 Jaguars +7 Steelers
2017 Saints +5 Vikings
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.