No, you're talking about a philosophy and politics and grading it against college football, not nearly the same thing.
Also the progressive movement of the line you were referencing above regarding Donald Trump, took place over several weeks/months, this line movement happened over 45 to 60 minutes. There is no value taking a 24 point favorite and now requiring them to cover -3. Absolutely no value whatsoever in less you were getting a tremendous return on investment.
The fact that you were trying to bring a political betting principal and at the college football for I'm sure that you are incapable of understanding what I'm saying, but let me put it to you another way
Do a two team PLEASER. 6 points. That is where you sell points, to make the line worse in your favor. If you can get one right. The odds are huge in return. Now you're asking for a +27 line difference, how many games do you bet, were you beat the spread by 27. One or two a year?
Overall, it is a very bad principal to bet on a 24 point underdog to cover the second half spread money line, while they were up three points. As a matter of fact it is just done out of pure greed and stupidity, my position on the comments I made earlier stand
No, you're talking about a philosophy and politics and grading it against college football, not nearly the same thing.
Also the progressive movement of the line you were referencing above regarding Donald Trump, took place over several weeks/months, this line movement happened over 45 to 60 minutes. There is no value taking a 24 point favorite and now requiring them to cover -3. Absolutely no value whatsoever in less you were getting a tremendous return on investment.
The fact that you were trying to bring a political betting principal and at the college football for I'm sure that you are incapable of understanding what I'm saying, but let me put it to you another way
Do a two team PLEASER. 6 points. That is where you sell points, to make the line worse in your favor. If you can get one right. The odds are huge in return. Now you're asking for a +27 line difference, how many games do you bet, were you beat the spread by 27. One or two a year?
Overall, it is a very bad principal to bet on a 24 point underdog to cover the second half spread money line, while they were up three points. As a matter of fact it is just done out of pure greed and stupidity, my position on the comments I made earlier stand
Point being, there can still be value in situations such as the one we have tonight.
Is this true in every situation? No, it's not true in most situations, but there are spots where there is value.
You're acting as if I'm saying this is a solid play to make on a daily basis, it's not, I rarely do it myself, but to act as if it NEVER makes sense is ignorant.
Point being, there can still be value in situations such as the one we have tonight.
Is this true in every situation? No, it's not true in most situations, but there are spots where there is value.
You're acting as if I'm saying this is a solid play to make on a daily basis, it's not, I rarely do it myself, but to act as if it NEVER makes sense is ignorant.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.