Doni you now have about 40 threads each ending with a litany of users calling you out for false records and lies -- why don't you maintain one BS thread with all of your plays and try to go honest for a bit in an effort to win back some cred? If not everyone will just keep reminding people of your lies and try to protect newbies on the forum from following your fake plays and numbers...just an idea...
Doni you now have about 40 threads each ending with a litany of users calling you out for false records and lies -- why don't you maintain one BS thread with all of your plays and try to go honest for a bit in an effort to win back some cred? If not everyone will just keep reminding people of your lies and try to protect newbies on the forum from following your fake plays and numbers...just an idea...
No, he claims a 49-13 record of plays like this (huge moneyline favorites, not spreads as he has clarified in past threads) where he Guarantees a winner. The problem with it is that let's say his record is 49-13 and then lets say that he takes an average ML wager at -400(even though the past few have been around the -575 range) he would be down units based of it. To win $100, he would have to wager $400. Well, 13 losses times $400 is -$5200 while his wins would equal $4900. Good luck with your bets Doni but you have been posting shady behind records since you joined and a lot of people are getting pissed
No, he claims a 49-13 record of plays like this (huge moneyline favorites, not spreads as he has clarified in past threads) where he Guarantees a winner. The problem with it is that let's say his record is 49-13 and then lets say that he takes an average ML wager at -400(even though the past few have been around the -575 range) he would be down units based of it. To win $100, he would have to wager $400. Well, 13 losses times $400 is -$5200 while his wins would equal $4900. Good luck with your bets Doni but you have been posting shady behind records since you joined and a lot of people are getting pissed
No, he claims a 49-13 record of plays like this (huge moneyline favorites, not spreads as he has clarified in past threads) where he Guarantees a winner. The problem with it is that let's say his record is 49-13 and then lets say that he takes an average ML wager at -400(even though the past few have been around the -575 range) he would be down units based of it. To win $100, he would have to wager $400. Well, 13 losses times $400 is -$5200 while his wins would equal $4900. Good luck with your bets Doni but you have been posting shady behind records since you joined and a lot of people are getting pissed
You've got it ALL WRONG homes. The 49-13 is ATS. Therefore, the win amount would be $4,900. The loss amount $1,430. Profit=
$3,470.
The SU record is 62-21. However, the only straight bets made on those 62 wins were if they were -5 or less; and of those games, I bought anywhere from 1 to 4 points to get the games almost at PK. Of the games over -5 (like Atlanta tonight); I simply used the games to parlay with other teams (I have 5 different 2 team parlays with Atlanta on each one).
So, as you all try to tell me........get the facts straight before you post.
And look for my 6th NBA playoff pick in a row tomorrow. It may help you win some cash.
No, he claims a 49-13 record of plays like this (huge moneyline favorites, not spreads as he has clarified in past threads) where he Guarantees a winner. The problem with it is that let's say his record is 49-13 and then lets say that he takes an average ML wager at -400(even though the past few have been around the -575 range) he would be down units based of it. To win $100, he would have to wager $400. Well, 13 losses times $400 is -$5200 while his wins would equal $4900. Good luck with your bets Doni but you have been posting shady behind records since you joined and a lot of people are getting pissed
You've got it ALL WRONG homes. The 49-13 is ATS. Therefore, the win amount would be $4,900. The loss amount $1,430. Profit=
$3,470.
The SU record is 62-21. However, the only straight bets made on those 62 wins were if they were -5 or less; and of those games, I bought anywhere from 1 to 4 points to get the games almost at PK. Of the games over -5 (like Atlanta tonight); I simply used the games to parlay with other teams (I have 5 different 2 team parlays with Atlanta on each one).
So, as you all try to tell me........get the facts straight before you post.
And look for my 6th NBA playoff pick in a row tomorrow. It may help you win some cash.
Doni you now have about 40 threads each ending with a litany of users calling you out for false records and lies -- why don't you maintain one BS thread with all of your plays and try to go honest for a bit in an effort to win back some cred? If not everyone will just keep reminding people of your lies and try to protect newbies on the forum from following your fake plays and numbers...just an idea...
I am replying to your thread because it is somewhat respectful. So, since you seem to be a bit confused, I will attempt to clarify.
I challenge you to find ANY discrepancies in my SU and/or ATS numbers throughout the season, including the playoff's.
The numbers have been changing consistently after every single game.
When the NBA playoff's began, the SU record was 57-21; the ATS 46-11.
Now, after a 6-0 "Guarantee" winner streak, the SU is now 62-21.
And since only 3 or those 6 teams covered, the ATS is now 49-14.
So I hope that clears it up.........and as for the 1H 2H thread, after seeing a thread, I just quickly checked stats, and mad a mistake in adding numbers. Totals are not part of any system I have. So as I said, the 10-0 1H, 2H thread was my mistake, and I need to check more thoroughly before I post.
Doni you now have about 40 threads each ending with a litany of users calling you out for false records and lies -- why don't you maintain one BS thread with all of your plays and try to go honest for a bit in an effort to win back some cred? If not everyone will just keep reminding people of your lies and try to protect newbies on the forum from following your fake plays and numbers...just an idea...
I am replying to your thread because it is somewhat respectful. So, since you seem to be a bit confused, I will attempt to clarify.
I challenge you to find ANY discrepancies in my SU and/or ATS numbers throughout the season, including the playoff's.
The numbers have been changing consistently after every single game.
When the NBA playoff's began, the SU record was 57-21; the ATS 46-11.
Now, after a 6-0 "Guarantee" winner streak, the SU is now 62-21.
And since only 3 or those 6 teams covered, the ATS is now 49-14.
So I hope that clears it up.........and as for the 1H 2H thread, after seeing a thread, I just quickly checked stats, and mad a mistake in adding numbers. Totals are not part of any system I have. So as I said, the 10-0 1H, 2H thread was my mistake, and I need to check more thoroughly before I post.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.