haha, I had Jets + under for $500 thinking it was the play of the day, might as well parlay with the under since the ONLY way for the Jets to cover the spread was for it to go under as well
I was also thinking that Geno had a 20% shot of throwing the pick for a td or fumbling in the end zone, normal QBs have around 5% but this is Geno
on the other hand, I had GB/Miami over which covered on the last play, second half over in the Miss game, which covered on the last play, Col St over Nevada, which covered on the last play, USC money line, which covered on a missed mid range FG,
haha, I had Jets + under for $500 thinking it was the play of the day, might as well parlay with the under since the ONLY way for the Jets to cover the spread was for it to go under as well
I was also thinking that Geno had a 20% shot of throwing the pick for a td or fumbling in the end zone, normal QBs have around 5% but this is Geno
on the other hand, I had GB/Miami over which covered on the last play, second half over in the Miss game, which covered on the last play, Col St over Nevada, which covered on the last play, USC money line, which covered on a missed mid range FG,
I agree with comment that Rex does not work enough on offense. He is just like his dad or Eagles would have possibly won a Super Bowl in 90's. They are defensive guys and should not be head coaches.
I agree with comment that Rex does not work enough on offense. He is just like his dad or Eagles would have possibly won a Super Bowl in 90's. They are defensive guys and should not be head coaches.
The Jets were a 99.99% favorite to cover the game. They had bad luck but they made great bets. Your problem is you think bad teams can't cover, but they cover in the NFL all the time.
99.99 really ? man you better my friend stop. keep betting 99.99 on bad teams. heres a lock YOU will go BROKE dam where do they come from god I would be rich if I could cover- covers bets
The Jets were a 99.99% favorite to cover the game. They had bad luck but they made great bets. Your problem is you think bad teams can't cover, but they cover in the NFL all the time.
99.99 really ? man you better my friend stop. keep betting 99.99 on bad teams. heres a lock YOU will go BROKE dam where do they come from god I would be rich if I could cover- covers bets
99.99 really ? man you better my friend stop. keep betting 99.99 on bad teams. heres a lock YOU will go BROKE dam where do they come from god I would be rich if I could cover- covers bets
I said that in the context of having 30 seconds left in the game and needing to avoid a pick six.
99.99 really ? man you better my friend stop. keep betting 99.99 on bad teams. heres a lock YOU will go BROKE dam where do they come from god I would be rich if I could cover- covers bets
I said that in the context of having 30 seconds left in the game and needing to avoid a pick six.
I agree with comment that Rex does not work enough on offense. He is just like his dad or Eagles would have possibly won a Super Bowl in 90's. They are defensive guys and should not be head coaches.
WHY ARE WE THE ONLY ONES WHO NO THAT?he is just a def. coach...morningwig blows...hope lame woody fires idzik an rex...been fan 4 40 years...CANT DO IT ANYMORE....I FEEL LIKE TRAITOR 2 MY POPS WHOS DIEHARD..oops caps on sorry
I agree with comment that Rex does not work enough on offense. He is just like his dad or Eagles would have possibly won a Super Bowl in 90's. They are defensive guys and should not be head coaches.
WHY ARE WE THE ONLY ONES WHO NO THAT?he is just a def. coach...morningwig blows...hope lame woody fires idzik an rex...been fan 4 40 years...CANT DO IT ANYMORE....I FEEL LIKE TRAITOR 2 MY POPS WHOS DIEHARD..oops caps on sorry
Field position game was insane. Jets started almost every drive 30+ yard line. While the Broncos only had good field position once in Jet territory and they went 3 $ out. Yet Broncos were still able to cover, that's how bad the Jets offense is.
Field position game was insane. Jets started almost every drive 30+ yard line. While the Broncos only had good field position once in Jet territory and they went 3 $ out. Yet Broncos were still able to cover, that's how bad the Jets offense is.
Anyone can get mad at me if they want--but if you're betting significant money backing the Jets, the freaking Jets...it's hard to have much sympathy. So much other action out there.
The Jets were a 99.99% favorite to cover the game. They had bad luck but they made great bets. Your problem is you think bad teams can't cover, but they cover in the NFL all the time.
Lol @ 99.99%. A blind man would have seen that was a bad bet. GENO SMITH VS PEYTON MANNING. Let's be serious fellas.
Anyone can get mad at me if they want--but if you're betting significant money backing the Jets, the freaking Jets...it's hard to have much sympathy. So much other action out there.
The Jets were a 99.99% favorite to cover the game. They had bad luck but they made great bets. Your problem is you think bad teams can't cover, but they cover in the NFL all the time.
Lol @ 99.99%. A blind man would have seen that was a bad bet. GENO SMITH VS PEYTON MANNING. Let's be serious fellas.
There was a segment on ESPN saying the sharps are on Miami, Jets, Buffalo, and NY Giants. So far every game lost. We shall see if NY Giants cover or not.
There was a segment on ESPN saying the sharps are on Miami, Jets, Buffalo, and NY Giants. So far every game lost. We shall see if NY Giants cover or not.
Feeling the pain. Had 5k on Jets +10. But also had $5k on baltimore -3.5 so only lost out in the juice. need arizona -6 to decide if it is a winning day or a losing day.
Feeling the pain. Had 5k on Jets +10. But also had $5k on baltimore -3.5 so only lost out in the juice. need arizona -6 to decide if it is a winning day or a losing day.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.