absolutely "down in flames" last week as the "Fades" went "Oh Fer". somewhat surprised it took until Week 12 for the players to "get their innings". here is this week offerings. FOLLOW or FADE
point spreads from Hilton contest. number of times selected in ( ). current (Saturday) LVS Superbook (former Hilton) point spread in [ ]."contra" = least selected team vs most selected team. *** Thursday Night Game. for some reason BOTH teams in Thusday games tend to be "least selected" SO go to next least on list. COVER = lose but cover point spread. DNC = win BUT did not cover point spread.
there is NO "Secret Squirrel" or "inside information" here. there are numerous Sports web sites that post the information. just Google the contest.
absolutely "down in flames" last week as the "Fades" went "Oh Fer". somewhat surprised it took until Week 12 for the players to "get their innings". here is this week offerings. FOLLOW or FADE
point spreads from Hilton contest. number of times selected in ( ). current (Saturday) LVS Superbook (former Hilton) point spread in [ ]."contra" = least selected team vs most selected team. *** Thursday Night Game. for some reason BOTH teams in Thusday games tend to be "least selected" SO go to next least on list. COVER = lose but cover point spread. DNC = win BUT did not cover point spread.
there is NO "Secret Squirrel" or "inside information" here. there are numerous Sports web sites that post the information. just Google the contest.
Again, thanks for keeping this thread alive and well.
Back the Falcons? I cannot do it.
I just can't see HOW the Bills are the #1 selection this week. ya the Falcons STINK but they are playing @ Toronto in a dome and they gave the Saints a game their last only losing by 4
Again, thanks for keeping this thread alive and well.
Back the Falcons? I cannot do it.
I just can't see HOW the Bills are the #1 selection this week. ya the Falcons STINK but they are playing @ Toronto in a dome and they gave the Saints a game their last only losing by 4
we should fade contra and follow top 5 selection right? cause it looks like sharps got raped last week
Ho BOY. Week 13 and I got explain AGAIN? "Fade the Hilton" is just what it says. you bet ON the teams playing AGAINST the 5 Most Selected teams (they are marked in bold) AND bet ON the "Contra" teams
"Fades" got beat up 0-5 for the FIRST losing week of the season last week BUT as the season goes on, the Hilton contestants usually get "mehr weiser" esp as "bottom feeders" drop out the contest.
we should fade contra and follow top 5 selection right? cause it looks like sharps got raped last week
Ho BOY. Week 13 and I got explain AGAIN? "Fade the Hilton" is just what it says. you bet ON the teams playing AGAINST the 5 Most Selected teams (they are marked in bold) AND bet ON the "Contra" teams
"Fades" got beat up 0-5 for the FIRST losing week of the season last week BUT as the season goes on, the Hilton contestants usually get "mehr weiser" esp as "bottom feeders" drop out the contest.
1) LeRinkrat, you stated yourself that the Hilton contest is weeding out the crappy bettors as the season goes on. However, last year's Hilton Top 5 records were compiled by a member last week, and it was seen that the trend was random, and fading HT5 in the last weeks was just as worthy as following. This only leads me to believe that this week is not going to be any stronger than tailing week 12, NOR does it make sense to fade all of week 13.
2) The only reason why Bills are 64% consensus-favored and liked, even though played in a dome setting, is because Atlanta F-N stinks on the road. You see that 0-5 on their stats sheet? The fact that both teams are 4th in their divisions makes it clear that with the "home" field advantage, there is value with the Bills here.
1) LeRinkrat, you stated yourself that the Hilton contest is weeding out the crappy bettors as the season goes on. However, last year's Hilton Top 5 records were compiled by a member last week, and it was seen that the trend was random, and fading HT5 in the last weeks was just as worthy as following. This only leads me to believe that this week is not going to be any stronger than tailing week 12, NOR does it make sense to fade all of week 13.
2) The only reason why Bills are 64% consensus-favored and liked, even though played in a dome setting, is because Atlanta F-N stinks on the road. You see that 0-5 on their stats sheet? The fact that both teams are 4th in their divisions makes it clear that with the "home" field advantage, there is value with the Bills here.
LeRink.. correct me if I'm wrong but the Panthers shouldn't be a 'contra' play because they are not "top 5" least selected. They are 6th down the list (for some reason you included 8 least selected this week).
Am I missing something?
PS - I kinda like the Panthers and def like the Bills
LeRink.. correct me if I'm wrong but the Panthers shouldn't be a 'contra' play because they are not "top 5" least selected. They are 6th down the list (for some reason you included 8 least selected this week).
Am I missing something?
PS - I kinda like the Panthers and def like the Bills
LeRink.. correct me if I'm wrong but the Panthers shouldn't be a 'contra' play because they are not "top 5" least selected. They are 6th down the list (for some reason you included 8 least selected this week).
Am I missing something?
PS - I kinda like the Panthers and def like the Bills
not counting Thanksgiving games, as most people don't have picks in by then...
LeRink.. correct me if I'm wrong but the Panthers shouldn't be a 'contra' play because they are not "top 5" least selected. They are 6th down the list (for some reason you included 8 least selected this week).
Am I missing something?
PS - I kinda like the Panthers and def like the Bills
not counting Thanksgiving games, as most people don't have picks in by then...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.