This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays
This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays
according to this strategy, if first half loses.. double up on under 2H. the game will then count as a win. the 2H total has already jumped from 42 to 44 at the book i use, so im gonna wait until close to the 2h kickoff to fire at the 2h under play in hopes of getting a better number.
always remember.. its a marathon not a sprint, this is the first game of many. play wisely my friends
according to this strategy, if first half loses.. double up on under 2H. the game will then count as a win. the 2H total has already jumped from 42 to 44 at the book i use, so im gonna wait until close to the 2h kickoff to fire at the 2h under play in hopes of getting a better number.
always remember.. its a marathon not a sprint, this is the first game of many. play wisely my friends
Hey Dude,I don't understand what your :either take all 2nd half under or take all 2nd half unders only if first half went over.Whether or not you bet on first half is irrelevant. Explain please
Hey Dude,I don't understand what your :either take all 2nd half under or take all 2nd half unders only if first half went over.Whether or not you bet on first half is irrelevant. Explain please
this game may very well play out like the baylor/washington game last yr in regards to pts per half. at half in the baylor/wash game there were 59 pts (35-24 in favor of wash) and then a remarkable 64pts total in the second half with baylor scoring 43 and wash 21 for a game total of 67-56 in favor of baylor.
this game may very well play out like the baylor/washington game last yr in regards to pts per half. at half in the baylor/wash game there were 59 pts (35-24 in favor of wash) and then a remarkable 64pts total in the second half with baylor scoring 43 and wash 21 for a game total of 67-56 in favor of baylor.
Hey Dude,I don't understand what your :either take all 2nd half under or take all 2nd half unders only if first half went over.Whether or not you bet on first half is irrelevant. Explain please
if you win 1h under, you DO NOT play 2h under.
if you lose 1h under, you double up on a 2h under play
Hey Dude,I don't understand what your :either take all 2nd half under or take all 2nd half unders only if first half went over.Whether or not you bet on first half is irrelevant. Explain please
if you win 1h under, you DO NOT play 2h under.
if you lose 1h under, you double up on a 2h under play
Of course it's for the long haul.. This might be the one .. When teams don't even try on defense .. Pretty crazy!!!.. C...Or it could totally turn around and the defenses make a few plays.. Have seen it before...
Of course it's for the long haul.. This might be the one .. When teams don't even try on defense .. Pretty crazy!!!.. C...Or it could totally turn around and the defenses make a few plays.. Have seen it before...
if your saying there a trend,then what is it? I understand what your saying I think.(i.e. take 2nd 1st half unders in all bowl games(both December and January) and layoff 2nd half if you win the half,or double up on 2nd half under if you lose. Is this what your saying? If so,then you must have lost your first half under bet in the Arizona game.
if your saying there a trend,then what is it? I understand what your saying I think.(i.e. take 2nd 1st half unders in all bowl games(both December and January) and layoff 2nd half if you win the half,or double up on 2nd half under if you lose. Is this what your saying? If so,then you must have lost your first half under bet in the Arizona game.
typo - should say(i.e. take all 1st half unders in both December and January,If you win,layoff 2nd half and if you lose,then double your wager on 2nd half.)
typo - should say(i.e. take all 1st half unders in both December and January,If you win,layoff 2nd half and if you lose,then double your wager on 2nd half.)
if your saying there a trend,then what is it? I understand what your saying I think.(i.e. take 2nd 1st half unders in all bowl games(both December and January) and layoff 2nd half if you win the half,or double up on 2nd half under if you lose. Is this what your saying? If so,then you must have lost your first half under bet in the Arizona game.
if your saying there a trend,then what is it? I understand what your saying I think.(i.e. take 2nd 1st half unders in all bowl games(both December and January) and layoff 2nd half if you win the half,or double up on 2nd half under if you lose. Is this what your saying? If so,then you must have lost your first half under bet in the Arizona game.
This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays
post#1 Hope this helps, tennesseerocker. good luck
This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays
post#1 Hope this helps, tennesseerocker. good luck
Look idiot- Why don't you just say If you took all 1st half unders in all bowl games last year for one unit,and if you laid off 2nd if you won,or doubled on 2nd half under if you lost,the you would been 32-2.One sentence and your done. No reason to go into all the crap about December and January. Looking at post #7,I'm not alone in being confused by your verbose,confusing fluff.
Look idiot- Why don't you just say If you took all 1st half unders in all bowl games last year for one unit,and if you laid off 2nd if you won,or doubled on 2nd half under if you lost,the you would been 32-2.One sentence and your done. No reason to go into all the crap about December and January. Looking at post #7,I'm not alone in being confused by your verbose,confusing fluff.
Tennesseerocker you are retarded. Bet whatever you want 1h. If you bet over and it hits. You won so call it a day. Now if you bet 1h under and lose, double down on 2h under.
Tennesseerocker you are retarded. Bet whatever you want 1h. If you bet over and it hits. You won so call it a day. Now if you bet 1h under and lose, double down on 2h under.
additionally,if you had no bet on 1st half and the game happens to go over in first half,then bet 2nd half under.Surely,this must have hit at an astounding rate.
additionally,if you had no bet on 1st half and the game happens to go over in first half,then bet 2nd half under.Surely,this must have hit at an astounding rate.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.