https://cityservices.baltimorecity.gov/dpw/waterwastewater02/waterquality4.html
Your just digging yourself in deeper. Just STFU before you make yourself look more foolish.
https://cityservices.baltimorecity.gov/dpw/waterwastewater02/waterquality4.html
Your just digging yourself in deeper. Just STFU before you make yourself look more foolish.
https://cityservices.baltimorecity.gov/dpw/waterwastewater02/waterquality4.html
Your just digging yourself in deeper. Just STFU before you make yourself look more foolish.
"your claims that the west coast of the us will experience dangerous levels of radiation is just flat out unfounded and false"
Your right its the whole country not just the west coast. Your a retard im done with you.
"your claims that the west coast of the us will experience dangerous levels of radiation is just flat out unfounded and false"
Your right its the whole country not just the west coast. Your a retard im done with you.
UC Berkeley's Department of Nuclear Engineering publishing 181 times maximum epa threshold isnt credible? Your a joke you just want to argue to argue.
UC Berkeley's Department of Nuclear Engineering publishing 181 times maximum epa threshold isnt credible? Your a joke you just want to argue to argue.
UC Berkeley's Department of Nuclear Engineering publishing 181 times maximum epa threshold isnt credible? Your a joke you just want to argue to argue.
UC Berkeley's Department of Nuclear Engineering publishing 181 times maximum epa threshold isnt credible? Your a joke you just want to argue to argue.
https://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1
https://dels-old.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/beir_vii_final.pdf
Theres a brief of a 700 page study from the national academies of science from 2005 that states there is no such thing as safe levels of ionizing radiation, period. You said no dangerous radiation would reach the US. Any radiation from fukushima no matter how small thats reached the US is dangerous. If you want to continue to argue that point I guess well have to agree to disagree.
https://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1
https://dels-old.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/beir_vii_final.pdf
Theres a brief of a 700 page study from the national academies of science from 2005 that states there is no such thing as safe levels of ionizing radiation, period. You said no dangerous radiation would reach the US. Any radiation from fukushima no matter how small thats reached the US is dangerous. If you want to continue to argue that point I guess well have to agree to disagree.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051027090539.htm
https://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11340
"There appears to be no threshold below which exposure can be viewed as harmless," said Abrams, professor emeritus of radiology at Stanford and Harvard universities and a member in residence at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) in the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Theres some more since you want to keep arguing radiation isnt dangerous for some reason.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051027090539.htm
https://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11340
"There appears to be no threshold below which exposure can be viewed as harmless," said Abrams, professor emeritus of radiology at Stanford and Harvard universities and a member in residence at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) in the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Theres some more since you want to keep arguing radiation isnt dangerous for some reason.
greedler:
You are arguing with a guy who is never wrong....at least in his own mind.
He will continue with his bs relies for a year if you give him the opportunity.
He is the same guy who issued these gems over in Pol Forum:
"Wind energy generation is deadlier than nuclear power generation"
and....
"Everything will be fine at Fukushima by March 21."
and as ive alluded to before in this thread, ive actually taken a few nuclear engineering college classes,
Tell me stevie.....what community college offered you these nuclear eng. courses?
greedler:
You are arguing with a guy who is never wrong....at least in his own mind.
He will continue with his bs relies for a year if you give him the opportunity.
He is the same guy who issued these gems over in Pol Forum:
"Wind energy generation is deadlier than nuclear power generation"
and....
"Everything will be fine at Fukushima by March 21."
and as ive alluded to before in this thread, ive actually taken a few nuclear engineering college classes,
Tell me stevie.....what community college offered you these nuclear eng. courses?
greedler:
You are arguing with a guy who is never wrong....at least in his own mind.
He will continue with his bs relies for a year if you give him the opportunity.
He is the same guy who issued these gems over in Pol Forum:
"Wind energy generation is deadlier than nuclear power generation"
and....
"Everything will be fine at Fukushima by March 21."
and as ive alluded to before in this thread, ive actually taken a few nuclear engineering college classes,
Tell me stevie.....what community college offered you these nuclear eng. courses?
greedler:
You are arguing with a guy who is never wrong....at least in his own mind.
He will continue with his bs relies for a year if you give him the opportunity.
He is the same guy who issued these gems over in Pol Forum:
"Wind energy generation is deadlier than nuclear power generation"
and....
"Everything will be fine at Fukushima by March 21."
and as ive alluded to before in this thread, ive actually taken a few nuclear engineering college classes,
Tell me stevie.....what community college offered you these nuclear eng. courses?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.