i did a little checking myself on about 10-12 team using this season's and last season's data and found that only 1 of those teams (minnesota i think) lost 3 consecutive road games OF ANY KIND by more than 3 points against the spread. Think about it, this system is hardly genius, the lines move to balance out over the course of a season for most teams. If you look a little further, how often does anyone lose 3 consecutive game of any kind by more than 3 points ATS? it doesnt happen much, and throw in the fact that being a road team gives you an extra 2-4 points ATS as it is, and the odds are pretty overwhelming that a team will cover 1 out of 3 on the road.
That being said, with a few tweaks built in to maximize effectiveness and trends, and this clearly can be a moneymaking system. Thanks for all the hard work and info Kangy (and others) and keep it up. ill be doing a little research of my own and sharing it with the forum when it can be helpful.
i did a little checking myself on about 10-12 team using this season's and last season's data and found that only 1 of those teams (minnesota i think) lost 3 consecutive road games OF ANY KIND by more than 3 points against the spread. Think about it, this system is hardly genius, the lines move to balance out over the course of a season for most teams. If you look a little further, how often does anyone lose 3 consecutive game of any kind by more than 3 points ATS? it doesnt happen much, and throw in the fact that being a road team gives you an extra 2-4 points ATS as it is, and the odds are pretty overwhelming that a team will cover 1 out of 3 on the road.
That being said, with a few tweaks built in to maximize effectiveness and trends, and this clearly can be a moneymaking system. Thanks for all the hard work and info Kangy (and others) and keep it up. ill be doing a little research of my own and sharing it with the forum when it can be helpful.
i did a little checking myself on about 10-12 team using this season's and last season's data and found that only 1 of those teams (minnesota i think) lost 3 consecutive road games OF ANY KIND by more than 3 points against the spread. Think about it, this system is hardly genius, the lines move to balance out over the course of a season for most teams. If you look a little further, how often does anyone lose 3 consecutive game of any kind by more than 3 points ATS? it doesnt happen much, and throw in the fact that being a road team gives you an extra 2-4 points ATS as it is, and the odds are pretty overwhelming that a team will cover 1 out of 3 on the road.
That being said, with a few tweaks built in to maximize effectiveness and trends, and this clearly can be a moneymaking system. Thanks for all the hard work and info Kangy (and others) and keep it up. ill be doing a little research of my own and sharing it with the forum when it can be helpful.
i did a little checking myself on about 10-12 team using this season's and last season's data and found that only 1 of those teams (minnesota i think) lost 3 consecutive road games OF ANY KIND by more than 3 points against the spread. Think about it, this system is hardly genius, the lines move to balance out over the course of a season for most teams. If you look a little further, how often does anyone lose 3 consecutive game of any kind by more than 3 points ATS? it doesnt happen much, and throw in the fact that being a road team gives you an extra 2-4 points ATS as it is, and the odds are pretty overwhelming that a team will cover 1 out of 3 on the road.
That being said, with a few tweaks built in to maximize effectiveness and trends, and this clearly can be a moneymaking system. Thanks for all the hard work and info Kangy (and others) and keep it up. ill be doing a little research of my own and sharing it with the forum when it can be helpful.
Also, keep in mind, I have converted all V1 series to V2 where applicable. I do play the first game of a multi-game road trip if a team is playing an in-conference opponent followed by three or more out of conference games. JM will not classify this as a V2, and if it wins, JM will not officially announce the remainder as a V1 either.
Kang, Are you playing Lakers today against Utah? Or are you gonna start playing them tomorrow?
Also, keep in mind, I have converted all V1 series to V2 where applicable. I do play the first game of a multi-game road trip if a team is playing an in-conference opponent followed by three or more out of conference games. JM will not classify this as a V2, and if it wins, JM will not officially announce the remainder as a V1 either.
Kang, Are you playing Lakers today against Utah? Or are you gonna start playing them tomorrow?
Yea, labby is the way to go. LA is at -9 and starting to go to -9 1/2, I dont know if we should grab it now or wait?
What I have noticed with these East/West bets this year is that the line opens up the day before and you should lock in your bet at that time. But if you cant then it is best to wait right before tip off. My suggestion is to wait till about 10 mins before tip off
Yea, labby is the way to go. LA is at -9 and starting to go to -9 1/2, I dont know if we should grab it now or wait?
What I have noticed with these East/West bets this year is that the line opens up the day before and you should lock in your bet at that time. But if you cant then it is best to wait right before tip off. My suggestion is to wait till about 10 mins before tip off
My Washington [A] pushed yesterday at +2. Going to continue them as a two game Labby chase starting 12/16. Lakers [B] and Detroit [A] are my plays tonight.
My Washington [A] pushed yesterday at +2. Going to continue them as a two game Labby chase starting 12/16. Lakers [B] and Detroit [A] are my plays tonight.
My Washington [A] pushed yesterday at +2. Going to continue them as a two game Labby chase starting 12/16. Lakers [B] and Detroit [A] are my plays tonight.
Talk about a last second heave of a three for Chicago that went in, for the cover. My LAL -10 went down in flames. It happens.
My Washington [A] pushed yesterday at +2. Going to continue them as a two game Labby chase starting 12/16. Lakers [B] and Detroit [A] are my plays tonight.
Talk about a last second heave of a three for Chicago that went in, for the cover. My LAL -10 went down in flames. It happens.
Detroit has gone down last night and tonight. They are now a (C) play Friday night againt the Thunder. I got started with the NBA late this year so this will be my first (C) play this year. Have there been any (C) plays this season? If so, what's the record for (C) plays?
Detroit has gone down last night and tonight. They are now a (C) play Friday night againt the Thunder. I got started with the NBA late this year so this will be my first (C) play this year. Have there been any (C) plays this season? If so, what's the record for (C) plays?
Detroit has gone down last night and tonight. They are now a (C) play Friday night againt the Thunder. I got started with the NBA late this year so this will be my first (C) play this year. Have there been any (C) plays this season? If so, what's the record for (C) plays?
I had Det +5.5 but am only able to buy 2 points so I took it up the A$$ again by 1/2 point.
That being said those able to buy 3 points could have won.
And you know JM will have 5.5 + 3 = 8.5 for the victory.
Detroit has gone down last night and tonight. They are now a (C) play Friday night againt the Thunder. I got started with the NBA late this year so this will be my first (C) play this year. Have there been any (C) plays this season? If so, what's the record for (C) plays?
I had Det +5.5 but am only able to buy 2 points so I took it up the A$$ again by 1/2 point.
That being said those able to buy 3 points could have won.
And you know JM will have 5.5 + 3 = 8.5 for the victory.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.